Jump to content

Football Focus

Otta

By Otta
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

????

????

Posted
Posted
2/18 points, no striker .....All Season, only had one anyway and Sam builds his WHOLE game plan around an injury prone single striker with no cover at the same time he spends A lot of money on Downing, when we already had that place covered. I was pragmatic enough for a while to accept BFS and his dogs shit football as a way of assuring our financial safety, he Isn,t even delivering that. His plan b, striker less football, was Sussed out after Tottenham. We have not beaten west Brom, palace, Norwich, Stoke, hull, Aston villa. I am joining the romantics I,d rather we went down with our traditions than this vastly overpaid (15th best in the world) fat sack excuse making dogsh1t of a man...I don,t think he,ll keep us up anyway.
Mick Mac

Mick Mac

Posted
Posted

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How do you blame BFS for WH not winning today? The

> season is only half way over and I saw a team who

> gave everything they had.


Stay clear of other peoples business might be a good motto at the moment.


The ????s are not happy hammers.

maxxi

maxxi

Posted
Posted

BFS's excuses Saturday - not enough strike power.. not enough central defenders... Christmas fixture congestion tiring players out... bad luck... lack of concentration... complacency... NOT MY FAULT.


Latest wheeze is the shedding of Mladen Petric (brought in on a free as a striker while Carroll was unavailable)


In October, Petric said: "I'm a striker. I want to play and I'm sure I'll get my time on the pitch."


Three substitute appearances and no goals later he's gone. No great loss so what the fuck was he doing there in the first place??


Sadly I fear our chairpeople lack the courage to act decisively and sack him, they'd rather cringe behind their wallets and hope for the best.

Parkdrive

Parkdrive

Posted
Posted

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Charlie Adam has got away with another horror

> tackle on one of our players. Paulinho out for at

> least four weeks after he racked his studs down

> his ankle ligaments. Dirty bastard.


Agreed, add Eto'o and Ramires to the list of dirty bastards who seem to get away with it week in week out. The odious BFS must go surely.

????

????

Posted
Posted

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This must be the end. Never mind 8 mill for

> Lambert - use the money to pay off BigUselessSam

> and let's start again.



Has he gone yet? Most fans lost faith a few weeks back, I think he's lost the players too.....only the board to convince

maxxi

maxxi

Posted
Posted

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------

> Has he gone yet? Most fans lost faith a few weeks

> back, I think he's lost the players too.....only

> the board to convince



And after today he can take Nolan with him - he's been getting worse by the week as a player and a Captain and today was the last straw, banned for 3 weeks now the petulant git.

malumbu

malumbu

Posted
Posted

I've been to three matches over the festive season, and seen a few more over the last few weeks on telly. Some real crackers but the two stinkers were the Arse/Chel (on telly) and today Arse/Cardiff, as well as getting wet as the roof is rubbish.


Is the quality of the Arse overated? or was that just an anomoly, perhaps in part due to the weather which was awful on both days


A second Arse question is as there are always thousands of empty (paid for tickets), a waiting list for season tickets, and they can in theory attract more than the ?60k capacity, why don't those not attending because they can't be arsed to leave their mansion in Herts to see a less attractive match on a rainy day, pass on their ticket to someone who does want to make the effort. I am not talking full price on Seatwave I hasten to add -better is used than wasted.


Oh and a fun anacdote now I will no longer be suprised by the ManU score as I was trying to watch it 'live' on MOTD, at WHL the only cheer on Boxing Day from the Spuds was when it was announced that WHU had gone one-nil up. Funnily enough they didn't announce 1-1, 1-2, 1-3. All credit to the Bluebird fans today for the noise they made BTW.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • HeadNun
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By HeadNun · Posted

      I'm certainly not surly - it's Friday, so I'm in a delightful mood.  As Earl Aelfheah said, the money has to come from somewhere. But Labour new that hiking fuel as well as employee NIC in would be a step too far - for businesses and consumers. It was the right decision for this moment in time. Suggesting that someone who's against fuel duty increase on this occasion is against and fuel duty full stop is quite a leap. Why do you demonise everyone who doesn't think that owning a car is a cardinal sin?  I'm not sure using Clarkson as an example of your average farmer holds much weight as an argument, but you know that already, Mal. 
    • lilolil
      Had to take a second look!

      By lilolil · Posted

      Hope it's making others smile too! I don't know the background or how long it's been there 😊
    • malumbu
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By malumbu · Posted

      If you are against the increase in fuel duty then you are surly against fuel duty full stop.  It has not kept up with inflation, I'm talking about getting it back on track.  Ultimately road user charging is the solution. Labour will probably compromise on agricultural land inheritance by raising the cap so it generally catches the Clarksons of the world who are not bothered about profits from land beyond, in his case, income from a highly successful TV series and the great publicity for the farm shop and pub
    • Pugwash
      Change to Charter North 6th Form Admissions?

      By Pugwash · Posted

      Were things much simpler in the 80/90s? I remember both my girls belonging to a 6th Form Consortium which covered Sydenham Girls, Forest Hill Boys and Sedgehill off Bromley Road. A level classes were spread across the 3 schools - i remember Forest Hill boys coming to Sydenham Girls for one subject (think it was sociology or psychology ) A mini bus was provided to transport pupils to different sites, But I guess with less schools being 'managed' by the local authority, providers such as Harris etc have different priorities. 

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...