Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Genuinely impressive stat on commentary saying

> Suarez has scored more by Christmas than any

> player in LFC history. That's after missing the

> start of the season, and early in today's match.


So what happens when he gets banned again or injured. Liverpool screwed? Just saying.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> PD, yeah probably, I'm not suggesting Liverpool

> would be where they are without Saurez.

>

> I just pointed out an impressive stat that I heard

> on the radio is all.


I wasn't having a go, it's exactly the sort of crap that so called professional pundits continually ask about Giroud at Arsenal, conveniently forgetting that Ramsey, Ozil, Walcott, Mertersacker et al have all pitched in with goals, but still they presist.

He doesn't need to spend anything. We've done that already. I think he'll give youth a chance. The Bentalab lad who came on against Southampton looked very assured and confident, is a good example. I don't want us wasting anymore money. I'd like to see Tom Carroll back from his loan spell at QPR, he has a good eye for a pass. You won't see him being overly cautious and playing two holding midfielders home or away. I think we'll be much for cavalier in our attitude so we can expect some high scoring entertaining games where we'll concede plenty but hopefully score more than the opposition. Good luck to him. COYS!

I wish him well, and it does look like he'll set teams up to go for it, which can only be good in terms of excitement. Big gamble though, and Levy's expectations will still be high.


I think they'll get rid of him in the summer anyway, once a couple of international coaches are done with the world cup.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm certainly not surly - it's Friday, so I'm in a delightful mood.  As Earl Aelfheah said, the money has to come from somewhere. But Labour new that hiking fuel as well as employee NIC in would be a step too far - for businesses and consumers. It was the right decision for this moment in time. Suggesting that someone who's against fuel duty increase on this occasion is against and fuel duty full stop is quite a leap. Why do you demonise everyone who doesn't think that owning a car is a cardinal sin?  I'm not sure using Clarkson as an example of your average farmer holds much weight as an argument, but you know that already, Mal. 
    • Hope it's making others smile too! I don't know the background or how long it's been there 😊
    • If you are against the increase in fuel duty then you are surly against fuel duty full stop.  It has not kept up with inflation, I'm talking about getting it back on track.  Ultimately road user charging is the solution. Labour will probably compromise on agricultural land inheritance by raising the cap so it generally catches the Clarksons of the world who are not bothered about profits from land beyond, in his case, income from a highly successful TV series and the great publicity for the farm shop and pub
    • Were things much simpler in the 80/90s? I remember both my girls belonging to a 6th Form Consortium which covered Sydenham Girls, Forest Hill Boys and Sedgehill off Bromley Road. A level classes were spread across the 3 schools - i remember Forest Hill boys coming to Sydenham Girls for one subject (think it was sociology or psychology ) A mini bus was provided to transport pupils to different sites, But I guess with less schools being 'managed' by the local authority, providers such as Harris etc have different priorities. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...