Jump to content

Recommended Posts

this is a long C&p but sums up BFS and West Ham very well to me:


Sam Allardyce will return to Upton Park tomorrow and he will, at best, receive a tepid reception. Whether the attending West Ham fans are openly hostile is a different matter, but Allardyce shouldn?t ride into London expecting a hero?s welcome. Reliably, the prelude to this game has featured the usual arguments as to why West Ham supporters owe their former manager more than they?re willing to give and, again predictably, the army of Proper Football Men have all made themselves available to testify on Allardyce?s behalf.


He controlled the club?s decline, he returned them to the Premier League, and he re-stabilised them.


That perspective has always been presented in quite a superficial way. West Ham did bounce back from relegation at the first opportunity and they remain a top-flight side largely because of his contribution. It was success with a small ?s?, a by-the-numbers affair which was worth a handshake and a ?well done? rather than rapturous applause and a standing ovation.


That?s the heart of this issue: the disparity between the affection he felt he was owed and what he was really entitled to is ? and always has been ? very wide.


Allardyce holds his own abilities in extraordinarily high regard and he radiates self-worth. To an extent that?s reasonable, because there are very few British managers who have enjoyed such top-flight longevity. But then that?s also part of the problem. While ego is fine ? and probably a mandatory quality in a successful coach ? he has never been particularly good at recognising his weaknesses or owning his mistakes.


And there were plenty of mistakes at West Ham, both in a footballing sense and also in how he conducted himself. Football supporters are not fools and while some are emotionally volatile, many more understand the game in great depth. Allardyce underestimated that. He repeatedly patronised those fans and, intentionally or otherwise, insulted their intelligence. It was naive; West Ham laboured to promotion from the Championship in 2012 with comfortably the strongest side in the division and in each of the three following seasons, in spite of significant spending, the side suffered through horribly fallow form.


West Ham were sometimes very effective and the list of clubs they beat during that period attests to that, but they were often very poor indeed.


Ultimately, that?s rather incidental. A shortage of entertainment paled in significance to the avoidance of relegation and, given the upcoming Olympic Stadium tenancy and the swelling television contract, survival trumped all other concerns.


But it always seemed as if Allardyce assessed his own contribution in very literal terms and judged his tenure in an overly-binary way. In his mind, he was set a series of objectives, he achieved them, and that meant that nobody was entitled to have any doubts over his management ? to him, the uneasy relationship he had with that fanbase was symptomatic of their narrow perspective.


It?s maybe okay to think that, but it?s something else to express it. Allardyce was publicly contemptuous of those who criticised him and remains so to this day.


?The fans were being brainwashed into thinking that, historically, the club had a particular style of play which was akin to Barcelona, which was potty. I once called the supporters deluded and I stand by that. I don?t know who invented the West Ham way phrase, but it?s a millstone around the club?s neck.?


Management, during difficult times, is about appeasement. Because of the cost of sitting in a Premier League ground in the 21st Century, head-coaches are obliged to show a certain level of contrition when performances are sub-standard. Conversely, by shirking that responsibility, making antagonistic gestures, and insisting that there?s no case to answer, a manager will very quickly drain his supply of goodwill. When a manager shows humility, supporters will typically gravitate towards him. But if he continuously behaves as if he?s beyond reproach, the atmosphere will quickly become very toxic indeed.


Sam Allardyce probably should be more respected for what he did during those four years, but that he is not is almost entirely his own fault. That?s the problem here, that?s the error which so many of these think-pieces make: the lack of love between the two parties is commonly blamed on snobbish native attitudes. Allardyce is characterised as the humble football man who gave his very best performance, only to be booed off the stage by a overly-demanding audience. He was the victim, the humble pragmatist who was unjustly heckled by an elitist crowd.


No, he was an antagonist. West Ham may not have been an easy job between 2011-2014, but he commonly presented his functional performance as an act of super-heroism. In his own mind he was a thrifty magician, holding back the tide of financial disparity and making the most with what little he had. In truth, he was spending eight figures on Andy Carroll and Matt Jarvis and then cupping his hand to the crowd after parking the bus at home against a ten-man Hull City.


It was hard to see the miracle. Had he been more humble during that time and had he recognised his own fallibility, all the irritations felt during his reign would already have melted away and the prevailing attitude would have been to focus on what he did right.


But it won?t be, because he believes that he only did right and that anyone contesting that is beneath his consideration.

I think that article is spot on, especially this bit...


''It was success with a small ?s?, a by-the-numbers affair which was worth a handshake and a ?well done? rather than rapturous applause and a standing ovation.''


But BFS didn't even warrant that from the EDF Hammers...

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think that article is spot on, especially this

> bit...

>

> ''It was success with a small ?s?, a

> by-the-numbers affair which was worth a handshake

> and a ?well done? rather than rapturous applause

> and a standing ovation.''

>

> But BFS didn't even warrant that from the EDF

> Hammers...


As the article says:


"Sam Allardyce probably should be more respected for what he did during those four years, but that he is not is almost entirely his own fault."

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think that article is spot on, especially this

> bit...

>

> ''It was success with a small ?s?, a

> by-the-numbers affair which was worth a handshake

> and a ?well done? rather than rapturous applause

> and a standing ovation.''

>

> But BFS didn't even warrant that from the EDF

> Hammers...



The success was all at the beginning and without trawling through for hard facts (eesh) I'm sure i said at one point that he deserved a well-done for the promotion - that it was what he was brought in for - and that that was the time he should have been let go. THEN he'd have got a handshake.


He stayed and he was given time and money and even (grudgingly) a second bite after he served up dogshit football and mocked the fans but he couldn't or wouldn't evolve. That handshake was withdrawn a long time before he was kicked out.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> red devil Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I think that article is spot on, especially

> this

> > bit...

> >

> > ''It was success with a small ?s?, a

> > by-the-numbers affair which was worth a

> handshake

> > and a ?well done? rather than rapturous

> applause

> > and a standing ovation.''

> >

> > But BFS didn't even warrant that from the EDF

> > Hammers...

>

> As the article says:

>

> "Sam Allardyce probably should be more respected

> for what he did during those four years, but that

> he is not is almost entirely his own fault."


I read that as more respected than a handshake/well done, or else why write that in the first place...


ETA. The key word is 'more', which says there is some respect to begin with, as opposed to no respect whatsoever as shown by the EDF Hammers.

Yeah I read that earlier and thought you'd be gutted Jah. Hopefully he can still make more of a recovery...



On a brighter note for you, that's a massive result for Spurs today, and I just saw this on BBC website.


"Tottenham have now won 17 points from losing positions in the Premier League this season ? the most in the Premier League."

Yes but a very tough week ahead for Spurs. Two London derbies against West Ham and Arsenal. If we can come away with all three points in both games and Leicester drop points I'll be absolutely elated.


Jimmy Greaves is a fighter. He's overcome more than a few obstacles in the past. Having had a nasty bout of hepatitis in the 60s where some observers, including himself reckoned he lost a yard of pace, "Chopper" Harris and Norman "Bites yer legs" Hunter trying to kick lumps out of him didn't seem to stop his amazing goalscoring feats though, not playing in the World Cup final and of course his well publicised battle with the bottle. He will soldier on right until the bitter end.

Given his age, Jimmy seems to be in good hands. What's happened to him is one of those things in life. I felt sad about Georgie Best as his death seemed self inflicted. Jimmy seems to be able to accept his predicament without bitterness. It can only help him in the rest of his life.
Good 'ol LVG. He's doing a Houdini act at OT. Today's match was probably the most satisfying of the season. I don't know if JM has been offered the job next season but just to see Louis get out of his seat and fall down in front of the 4th official makes me want to wish him good luck.

No idea how you can say a team doesn't deserve to be champs because they lost a game. If they finish top after 38 matches then they deserve to be champs because they've got more points than anyone else, simple.


That said, I still want Leicester to do it. Spurs would also be a breath of fresh air, but it's the fact Leicester nearly got relegated last year and their squad cost nowhere near what their rivals have spent. Would just be a wonderful story.

It's how they lost the game. They don't have the x factor. United should have been there for the taking but 3-2 was closer than they deserved. Spurs and/or Leicester may get the yips but Arsenal haven't shown today they have what it takes to take advantage.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Good 'ol LVG. He's doing a Houdini act at OT.

> Today's match was probably the most satisfying of

> the season. I don't know if JM has been offered

> the job next season but just to see Louis get out

> of his seat and fall down in front of the 4th

> official makes me want to wish him good luck.


Anyone who gets credit for falling over at Old Trafford in front of the fourth official deserves to remain as manager for decades.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The top front tooth has popped out.  Attempted to fix myself with repair kit bought from Boots, unfortunately it didn’t last long.  Tooth has popped out again.  Unable to get to dentist as housebound but family member can drop off.  I tried dental practice I found online, which is near Goose Green, but the number is disconnected.   The new dental practice in FH (where Barclays used to be) said it’s not something they do.  Seen a mobile dental practice where a technician comes to your home and does the repair but I’m worried about the cost. Any suggestions please? Thank you 
    • So its OK for Starmer to earn £74K/annum by renting out a property, cat calling the kettle black....... Their gravy train trundles on. When the Southport story that involves Starmer finally comes out, he's going to be gone, plus that and the local elections in May 2025 when Liebour will get a drumming. Even his own MP's have had enough of the mess they've made of things in the first three months of being in power. They had fourteen years to plan for this, what a mess they've created so quickly, couldn't plan there way out of a paper bag.   Suggest you do the sums, the minimum wage won't  be so minimum when it is introduced, that and the increase in employers national insurance contributions is why so many employers are talking about reducing their cohort of employees and closing shops and businesses.  Businesses don't run at a loss and when they do they close, its the only option for them, you can only absorb a loss for so long before brining the shutters down and closing the doors. Some people are so blinkered they think the sun shines out of the three stooges, you need to wake up soon. Because wait till there are food shortages, no bread or fresh vegetables, nor meat in the shops, bare shelves in the supermarkets because the farmers will make it happen, plus prices spiralling out of control as a result of a supply and demand market. Every ones going to get on the gravy train and put their prices up, It happened before during lockdown, nothing to stop it happening again. You don't shoot the hand that feeds you. Then you'll see people getting angry and an uprising start to happen.  Hungry people become angry people very quickly. 
    • Eh? Straight ahead of what?  If you turn left at Goose Green, as you also posted above, you end up at the library. Then the Grove. Then, unless you turn right at the South Circular, you end up at Forest Hill!
    • yes I’ve spotted this too — it’s near me and I’m very intrigued to see what it’ll be 👀👀👀👀      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...