Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Anyway, the real test is when Spurs play

> a halfway decent team.


I don't think that's holds true anymore. The PL is far more competitive than it used to be. If a team is going for the Championship then I agree they have to beat, or at least not lose to the other challengers, but as Chelsea found out last season, it's just as important to not drop points against the so called lesser teams...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/competitions/premier-league/11054725/Are-big-matches-really-that-important-in-deciding-who-wins-the-Premier-League-title.html


On that subject it seems the team who does better against the top teams wins the league. Chelsea were an exception.


http://www.soccerstats.com/homeaway.asp?league=england_2014


United did well away from home last season if you look at the stats. So apart from an awful home record their season might have ended quite differently.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Didn't see it but it's early days and you've got

> nine new players to bed in. That's two more than

> Spurs last season. So by my reckoning seeing as we

> finished sixth back then Liverpool will finish

> eighth.



What I like is that he's not throwing them all straight in. Last night's starting line up didn't look too unfamiliar. We were arguably the better side for the first half but made a couple of big errors which get punished by teams as good as City


And I have no bloody idea how Ague was allowed to score with his first touch about 25 seconds after coming on. Thought I was watching a replay or something.

From what I've seen of the 2 supposed main contenders for the title, the chavs and City, I'd say City look far superior. CSKA Fulham weren't convincing in their two gams against newly promoted sides, and while you could argue that City didn't overpower Newcastle and Liverpool, what they did do was take their chances with ruthless efficiency. For me, that is what will win the title.

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> and while you could argue that

> City didn't overpower Newcastle and Liverpool,

> what they did do was take their chances with

> ruthless efficiency. For me, that is what will win

> the title.



Agreed

Lampard has confirmed retirement from international football. Saw this comment on the BBC site which really made me laugh. If he really said that, I like him a bit more.


"Good effort Frank! met him the other day shortly after he arrived at City and says he's settled in well, adding: "I recognise many of the fans from when they supported Chelsea"

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lampard has confirmed retirement from

> international football. Saw this comment on the

> BBC site which really made me laugh. If he really

> said that, I like him a bit more.

>

> "Good effort Frank! met him the other day shortly

> after he arrived at City and says he's settled in

> well, adding: "I recognise many of the fans from

> when they supported Chelsea"


And most likely Yanited before that, and Liverpool in the 70's and 80's.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> not to mention a brief patch supporting

> Newcastle!! Where are all those shirts these days

> I wonder, unloved at the back of a cupboard?


Funny thing you mentioning old shirts, do you ever see anyone wearing a Chav shirt that pre dates 2003? Nah, me neither.

Out of the blue I know, but I feel really sorry for Sevilla. They always seem to get a decent team and then have to sell their best players. If they want fair play in Spain they should divide the TV money like they do here. It's virtually a two team league each season, apart from the last one.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Agree with @Sue the Dog is awful-nice building awful food. We like The Rossendale and Watsons
    • There are so many variables. Good chefs can having bad nights, post-Brexit staff shortages, your dish might be brilliant, your friend might order something that's inedible. In the end I think the best option is just to go to the restaurant which has the best overall reviews. If all the reviews are bad then avoid, but even if all the reviews are good that's not a cast iron gaurantee. 
    • The trouble is that pub management and chefs are constantly changing, so what might be fantastic on one occasion  becomes terrible a short time later, and vice versa. Two of the worst pub lunches I've had locally were at the Dog in the village and the Plough, but both those were some time ago. We had an absolutely appalling Christmas lunch on Christmas Day at The Cherry Tree, which was also exorbitantly expensive, so unless their chef (I use the term loosely) has changed, I wouldn't advise eating there. The menu looked amazing. We thought we would treat ourselves. Never again 😭
    • If you've seen the original longer post then you'll know that you've taken that out of context. I don't charge but didn't feel I even needed to say that – you've made it sound like I do charge and that's why I deleted this part of the post saying I don't charge. When I read back what I'd written it sounded like I was defending myself against criticisms that hadn't even been made so i cut it out. And now you've made that kind of criticism anyway I should've left it in.  What do you mean "not charging people to read your reviews of their local restaurants."?  You make it sound like i'm sneaking into SE22 from somewhere else. I live here - they are reviews of my local restaurants!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...