Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> red devil Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I'm not writing him off. Before the first leg I

> > said it would be interesting to see how

> Bayern's

> > high line defence would fare against Real's

> pace

> > and counter attack style. In the first leg they

> > got away with it with Ronaldo just coming back

> > from injury and Bale benched with 'flu. Real

> > could've easily won that game 3-0 Last night we

> > saw how tactically naive that high line was...

>

> Barca also played a high line for many seasons and

> Puyol read the game/orchestrated any necessary

> last ditch recoveries. You need very sharp players

> to make the tactic work, but it can work as it

> stifles the oppositions midfield - its a

> possession winning tactic.

>

> (edited to add that with the wrong personnel, eg

> AVB's Spurs, it can be made to look naive)



agreed on all counts

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Real were fantastic, but what has happened to

> Bayern?


TBH they didn't look great in the last round either " dull and tentative and tetchy and could be vulnerable if the mancs can put a barnstorming 'run-at-the-buggers'-type attack" - but then they were only playing ManU :)

Apparently the CSKA Fulham fleet of buses was unavailable last night as they were busy ferrying passengers stranded by yesterdays tube strike, such a selfless act. After the game Wenger called Mrs Maureen to offer words of comfort, from one specialist in failure to another.

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Apparently the CSKA Fulham fleet of buses was

> unavailable last night as they were busy ferrying

> passengers stranded by yesterdays tube strike,

> such a selfless act. After the game Wenger called

> Mrs Maureen to offer words of comfort, from one

> specialist in failure to another.


LOL Mourinho a specialist in failure? Righty-oh.

Millhaven Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parkdrive Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Apparently the CSKA Fulham fleet of buses was

> > unavailable last night as they were busy

> ferrying

> > passengers stranded by yesterdays tube strike,

> > such a selfless act. After the game Wenger

> called

> > Mrs Maureen to offer words of comfort, from one

> > specialist in failure to another.

>

> LOL Mourinho a specialist in failure? Righty-oh.


Glad you agree, plus you missed a classless self promoting twat, and that's just his good points. Finally the British media have found him out are are starting to be less sycophantic than than used to be. The funny thing is this season Moyes who has won the Charity shield will have more trophies to his name than Maureen. Specialist in failure, how that phrase has come back to haunt him. If he'd been as good as he thinks he is he would have gone for it in Madrid and not parked the fleet. Couldn't happen to nicer bloke.

Are you being serious? You are looking back on just this past season? You do realise the charity shield is only contested by the winner's of the previous season and winners of the FA Cup? And well done Moyes for beating a championship side to win that.


If your football knowledge only stretches back 10 months I am not sure what point there is argueing further. But I will agree that Moyes has definitely won more trophies this past ten months than Mourinho. I am aghast that Man United sacked the poor fellow.

Millhaven Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Are you being serious? You are looking back on

> just this past season? You do realise the charity

> shield is only contested by the winner's of the

> previous season and winners of the FA Cup? And

> well done Moyes for beating a championship side to

> win that.

>

> If your football knowledge only stretches back 10

> months I am not sure what point there is argueing

> further. But I will agree that Moyes has

> definitely won more trophies this past ten months

> than Mourinho. I am aghast that Man United sacked

> the poor fellow.



Unlike Chavs fans whose collective memory only goes back to 2005 eh? You've got the manager your club and the fans deserve. Di Matteo wins the UCL Ancelloti does the double, both sacked by your club but Maureen is welcomed back as a tactical genuis. The sight of Terry crying last night was a joy to behold. Long may the specialist in failure continue to be hailed as a hero by your club.

Parkdrive Wrote:


>

>

> Unlike Chavs fans whose collective memory only

> goes back to 2005 eh? You've got the manager your

> club and the fans deserve. Di Matteo wins the UCL

> Ancelloti does the double, both sacked by your

> club but Maureen is welcomed back as a tactical

> genuis. The sight of Terry crying last night was a

> joy to behold. Long may the specialist in failure

> continue to be hailed as a hero by your club.


You'll find there are plenty of us that remember Chelsea winning the cup winners cup way back in the 70s (I was 11yo) and all those years in the wilderness after that. Which makes the period of sustained success all the more sweeter. The trouble is, when you finally achieve regular success, especially when a investor unafraid of losing money comes along, this will breed resentment/jealousycontempt from other club supporters, which goes with the territory.


Mourinho will always wind some rival supporters up because he is brash and sucessful, but I think you will find that not just Chelsea supporters are of the opinion that Mourinho is a tatical genius as you put it. Some Chelsea supporters may even disagree with some of the things he says. For example I thought his comments after the West Ham game were ill-judged. I was at that game and felt that West Ham defended resolutely. We should have been able to break them down, but we didn't.


I think the board decision to sack Ancelotti was a disgrace. Deserved another season after winning the double. I knew Roberto might not be the one to take us onwards despite the CL win but once the board elected to keep him on they should have at least kept him until the summer, instead of giving us the debarcle of having Benitez in charge.

Lots of successful managers aren't despised in the same way that Maureen is, he is the special one in that respect. As for the debacle of Benitez, didn't he also win a trophy for you? Lest we forget Maureen also tried to gouge the eye of an official from an opposing team. One of just a few reasons he is despised.

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lots of successful managers aren't despised in the

> same way that Maureen is, he is the special one in

> that respect. As for the debacle of Benitez,

> didn't he also win a trophy for you? Lest we

> forget Maureen also tried to gouge the eye of an

> official from an opposing team. One of just a few

> reasons he is despised.


Yes, not exactly the sort of behavior to enamour you with anyone I have to agree.


Benitez was almost universally hated by every Chelsea supporter. Don't really expect anyone outside to understand. Unless they have been through similar with their own clubs.

Millhaven Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parkdrive Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Lots of successful managers aren't despised in

> the

> > same way that Maureen is, he is the special one

> in

> > that respect. As for the debacle of Benitez,

> > didn't he also win a trophy for you? Lest we

> > forget Maureen also tried to gouge the eye of

> an

> > official from an opposing team. One of just a

> few

> > reasons he is despised.

>

> Yes, not exactly the sort of behavior to enamour

> you with anyone I have to agree.

>

> Benitez was almost universally hated by every

> Chelsea supporter. Don't really expect anyone

> outside to understand. Unless they have been

> through similar with their own clubs.



So why do you not show the same level of hatred for eto'o who once famously said he would rather sell groundnuts in his home village than play for Mourinho? Your fans also slated Benitez for failing to play attaractive flowing football but the current guy is lauded for playing defensive dour football. Hypocritical? Just a tad.

Didn't Mourinho get sacked from Chelsea for not playing attractive enough football? He won things but that wasn't sufficient for RA if memory serves me correctly. I don't despise him at all as I can't help thinking he's just acting most of the time. Pep, who was the bees knees at Barca is now getting flack for his style of play at Bayern from no less than Franz Beckenbauer. It must be hard to be a manager, apart from the money you earn.

Parkdrive Wrote:

>

> So why do you not show the same level of hatred

> for eto'o who once famously said he would rather

> sell groundnuts in his home village than play for

> Mourinho? Your fans also slated Benitez for

> failing to play attaractive flowing football but

> the current guy is lauded for playing defensive

> dour football. Hypocritical? Just a tad.


It would be hypocritical if you weren't talking bollocks. Benitez was hated for comments leveled at Chelsea whilst being in charge at Liverpool. Eto'o did make comments then retracted them when after he actually worked for the man. There were some that hated the fact Eto'o came to Chelsea but most if not all have warmed to him. Anyway, football is full of hypocracies.

Millhaven Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parkdrive Wrote:

> >

> > So why do you not show the same level of hatred

> > for eto'o who once famously said he would

> rather

> > sell groundnuts in his home village than play

> for

> > Mourinho? Your fans also slated Benitez for

> > failing to play attaractive flowing football

> but

> > the current guy is lauded for playing defensive

> > dour football. Hypocritical? Just a tad.

>

> It would be hypocritical if you weren't talking

> bollocks. Benitez was hated for comments leveled

> at Chelsea whilst being in charge at Liverpool.

> Eto'o did make comments then retracted them when

> after he actually worked for the man. There were

> some that hated the fact Eto'o came to Chelsea but

> most if not all have warmed to him. Anyway,

> football is full of hypocracies.


Love the way I talk bollocks but you talk perfect sense. True Chelsea fan, well done.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Didn't Mourinho get sacked from Chelsea for not

> playing attractive enough football? He won things

> but that wasn't sufficient for RA if memory serves

> me correctly. I don't despise him at all as I

> can't help thinking he's just acting most of the

> time. Pep, who was the bees knees at Barca is now

> getting flack for his style of play at Bayern from

> no less than Franz Beckenbauer. It must be hard to

> be a manager, apart from the money you earn.


We'll never know for sure but I am of the belief that the board became concerned with the negative football and the mounting negative press the club were getting, specially post Friskgate. But I also believe Mourinho and Abramovich parted on good terms and that Mourinho wanted/needed another challenge.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...