Jump to content

Recommended Posts

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> is it a good thing? maybe not. But it's how Man

> Utd and to a lesser extent Arsenal dominated much

> of last 16 years until the BIG money came in .


At Utd, Fergie would identify a transfer target, and after getting Board approval(according to Fergie the Glazers never once baulked at one of his targets) David Gill would then go away and conduct the business end of it.

Apparently at Arsenal, Wenger gets involved in the wheelin' and dealin', right down to the size of the fee, something Fergie didn't.

I think the new Moyes/Woodward axis is run along similar lines...

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Not qualifying for CL this season a disaster? It

> won?t help us attract players for sure, but it

> will think out our fixture list and allow a bit

> more focus.


You won't get much focus time in the Europa League, ask Liverpool...

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You've always been pretty supportive of your

> manager PD. Where do you stand at rhe moment?

>

> BBC reporting today that the ox is out til

> November.


Its an all too familiar pattern, with the exception of a mass clear out of players, many not before time. While I wouldn't like to have the kind of backers City have, they have at least got their business done early. As for Wenger, I'm not sure who would come in if he was shown the door or who is available. I have no great expectations this season at all. I've not felt like that since the dark days of the 80's. I have a feeling City may take the title this season.

Death of football maybe not but I certainly think we're heading for a huge punch up between league and international footy thanks to the Qatar debacle.


I think Patrick Barclay was right when he said it's an opportunity to put the world cup on in the winter rather than the 'off season' and would revitalise it - but league football would suffer and there would be a big dip in tv revenue which could be a mini financial crisis for some clubs not to mention the injury/fatigue knock-on effect which clubs would be clamouring to get compo for.


Lately I find myself caring less and less about England's prospects/performances. Given the choice would the panel rather an England world cup victory or their club winning the premiership or (for those teams for whom that has become the norm) doing the treble?

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> we lose qualifier, i don't think we even make

> Europa league

>

> I might be wrong but that was my understanding



I don't know either. I was alluding to the long term scenario ;-)

Despite what Jah thinks(hopes) I'm sure Spurs are already reinvesting the money that they will be getting for Bale in quality players. IMO this is something that Arsenal never really did after selling RVP, Fabregas etc. I'm holding back on my predictions until the transfer window closes, but as things stand I can see Spurs finishing above Arsenal this season. If that happened, as well as not attracting top players by not being in the CL, Arsenal then might have a problem holding onto their best players e.g. Wilshire. Add in the loss of income from the CL and future commercial deals, and you can see how quickly things can unravel. If it can happen to Liverpool it can happen to anyone. None of this is wishful thinking by the way, just how I see it...

"Given the choice would the panel rather an England world cup victory or their club winning the premiership or (for those teams for whom that has become the norm) doing the treble?"


Entirely academic question on both counts.


Stevenage in the Premiership would be nice and is the most achievable of the three.

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Lately I find myself caring less and less about

> England's prospects/performances. Given the choice

> would the panel rather an England world cup

> victory or their club winning the premiership or

> (for those teams for whom that has become the

> norm) doing the treble?


Having already won The Treble, I'm quite happy to share the love of a world cup win ;-)

Joking aside, I enjoyed the Olympic spirit last year and I think a WC win for England would be in simialr vein, a once in a lifetime experience, something the whole country could share in...just as long a Utd player scores the winning goal ;-)

It's become old hat for my other team, time to let someone else have a go (that being Brasil obviously!!!).


I'd have actuially hated to see the generation just petering out win it, they didn't deserve to win, but probably for the reasons that they actually poerformed so indifferently, which was kind of self fulfilling I guess.


If the players play like they care then I'd be delighted, but the talent isnt there, and so far from what I've seen the commitment to do, say, a greece, isn't really there either.

World cup win every time. England winning the rugby world cup, the 2005 ashes, the Olympics, these are things that stay with you and put every one in a good mood.


Agree abour the national side, but that Scotland match reminded me what our can be like when there's some passion.

I still remember the country's euphoria the last time we won the World Cup though I was very upset that my childhood hero Jimmy Greaves missed the match through injury. I'd be enormously happy if we won it again. But if in the unlikely event that Tottenham Hotspur won a treble I'd probably come in my pants.

Ladygooner Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Very encouraged by Arsenal's performance last

> night and the news that we might be buying 2 Real

> Madrid players.....



Same here, but our squad is wafer thin and I'm certain we won't get either Benzema or Di Maria.

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Same here, but our squad is wafer thin and I'm

> certain we won't get either Benzema or Di Maria.



Someone on the BBC website had tweeted something along the lines of


"Arsenal stengthen, whilst giving Real the money to get Bale and weaken Spurs. Wenger is a genius"


Made me laugh.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The timing is suspicious, but maybe the

> Board/Wenger have been shocked into action by the

> fans' reaction to the Villa game...


Guillem Balague when asked about this rumour last night stated neither was anywhere near the truth, and of all of the broadcasters out there, he's the one that I take heed of as 9 times out of 10 he's spot in respect of Spanish football.

Looks like Chelsea have snatched Willian from under Sprurs' noses.


So Bale off for ?93m. All I can say is that if I was a Spurs fan I'd be over the moon. How can he be worth that, I'm sorry but he is no Messi / Ronaldo. Not yet anyway.


Will be interesting to see how he gets on. I hope he flops, the diving whinge bag.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
    • Another recommendation for Silvano. I echo everything the above post states. I passed first time this week with 3 minors despite not starting to learn until my mid-30s. Given the costs for lessons I have heard, he's also excellent value.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...