Jump to content

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, malumbu said:

Spoke to a copper today, the other boroughs offer a little support but not a lot, much of the police numbers are overtime which is as he said double bubble.  But a fine bit of casual racism from said copper, he didn't want to volunteer as he didn't want to be stabbed.

Hopefully most of these stereotypical views have now been kicked out of the Met.  Totally irreverent to the thread of course.  Worked on and off with the Met for a long time and generally seen things improve addressing institutional racism. 

A general request to cut the personal comments, bemused to have the T word used against me but a version of the C word is getting a bit silly.  I'll leave that there.

That simply isn't true.

7000 officers were on duty on Monday, 14,000 officer shifts were logged over the weekend. There's the overtime.

The Met's total officer headcount is just under 34,000.

There are 32 boroughs in Greater London.

Are you honestly trying to suggest that The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea has 20% of all Met officers?

6 or 7 times the borough average?

Strange thing to argue about.  Let's say that there is a 50 50 split between those on a normal shift and those on overtime.  That's around 3500 normal shift out of 34k.  So maybe down 10% down and no doubt shift patterns are changed in the boroughs to spread things out over the weekend ie when there are less cops needed for NH.

Point is that the racist graffiti bloke will be dealt with according to normal police priorities and the carnival will cause a little disruption rather than boroughs being in crisis.

In fact I could suggest that crime would drop in Catford Brixton and some other crime hotspots but that could be read as casual racism.  So I won't.

Edited by malumbu
1 hour ago, malumbu said:

In fact I could suggest that crime would drop in Catford Brixton and some other crime hotspots but that could be read as casual racism.  So I won't

But you did.......and by doing so did you not just engage in hipster racism?

Are Brixton and Catford hipster now? 

I can't even work out where this thread is going. Started off trying to see if anyone recognised the tagger, publicised by the police for racist graffiti. Then, resources of police and if they would attend that crime but not a home burglary, and why so many police attend the carnival but being very clear that there is no stereotypical cause of the violence and that it's proportional to violent crime in Dulwich, so all quite normal and expected.

That doesn't make any sense.

(waiting for the outraged comments as I've missed the point - in which case, summarise it)

 

 

 

 

  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
1 hour ago, malumbu said:

In fact I could suggest that crime would drop in Catford Brixton and some other crime hotspots

Not necessarily. The types of crimes may and do change. Coldharbour lane for instance had one stretch of it back in the 90's that was an open crack market. That has gone and now it's full of late night bars the crime levels are still quite high but not drug related. More violence and anti social stuff but crime all the same.

Football is another one. There's much less toe to toe violence to the extent it's quite rare but the arrests for drug possession ( bugle) have soared. As has the numbers for hate chanting / racial/ homophobic chanting.

10 hours ago, Jules-and-Boo said:

I can't even work out where this thread is going. 

That's the nature of human conversation though, isn't it? It meanders. If you meet friends at a coffee shop or pub, you don't only speak the same exact topic from the moment you walk in to the moment you leave...

  • Like 1
12 hours ago, tiddles said:

Please get back to the subject please 

After you,,,,,,,,, The  subject and discussion is based on a crime and how it is or isn't being investigated. That will open other avenues of thought and debate but is still relevant to the topic.

They've made an arrest in this case:

'A man, 64, was arrested on Thursday on suspicion of racially-aggravated criminal damage and displaying writing with intent to stir up racial hatred.

He was taken to a south London police station where he was questioned before being bailed pending further enquiries.'

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/racist-graffiti-dulwich-hamlet-fc-police-arrest-b1179875.html

Please be mindful of this in any further comments.

Edited by IlonaM
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...