Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

I have to admit I pop in the odd time (every few months) to mcd's for a mcflurry. A wispamcflurry is heaven. (you can tell I've been single for a wee while heheh) but I do feel very guilty for it because I have been told so many times that they are evil and I always believe what I am told by white middle class liberals ;)


Luckily I dont crave burgers and chips so can leave the rest. Can they just open a McFlurry shop?

Starter - Filet-O-Fish

Main course - Big Mac

Dessert - Whatever choc-bar based ice cream is on the menu.

If the potato wedges are available have them.

But if the fries are free with any of the above then take them and use them to mollify the feral kids who come a-snapping at you for your enviably 'cut-above' repast.

And there will be feral kids.

Oh, yes.

James Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Have you tried the Creme Egg McFlurry? It's

> amazing!!!!!! (I am so ashamed, I read the

> Observer and everything)


xxxxx


OMG I saw an ad for this yesterday on a bus shelter, I am SO SO tempted, and I don't even like Creme Eggs and I hate soft ice cream, and the last time I went to a MacDonalds was in Bangkok circa 1992 :))


And there you have it, the power of advertising :))

What do you call it when you desperately need to pee and want to use a McDonald's just for the toilet and you explain to a member of staff that you will purchase food when you come out but of course have no intention of doing so?

McPiss with lies!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...