Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Vik Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Strike action.

>

> http://www.postoffice.co.uk/post-office-branches-s

> trike-action#s113200850

>

> Rye lane also affected, Crosswaithe Avenue open

> though and always quiet.



Thanks for the link, very useful. I rang the main number & they said Forest Hill Rd PO is open today but Rye Lane is shut. Lordship Lane is open again tomorrow.

Katy Tonbridge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A note on the door explaining what was happening

> with an apology for any inconvenience might have

> engendered a bit more sympathy for their cause.


There was no note when I went past this morning.

Apparently the Post Office want to close this branch and place a counter in another shop similar to the arrangement in Forest Hill. I have noticed that often the queues are shorter than they used to be but it can still get busy. We have always had good service at this branch. It would be interesting to hear of people's experiences with the Forest Hill service.

Lordship Lane Post Office costs ?1.48 to run for every ?1 of commission for providing the services. So its making a sizeable loss.

So the Post Office are seeking a retail partner to run a replacement Post Office franchise in the centre of Lordship Lane. I presume such a partner would make a profit by opening more hours to spread their capital costs further. For the staff they could either TUPE across but it's likely the hours would become more shop like.

The staff union the CWU is dead against any changes as clearly the staff are - hence the strikes.


Personally I find no queues at the Crossthwaite or 369 Lordship Lane (near Dulwich Library) sub Post Offices and provide 99% of the Post Office services I need.Both are open slightly longer except for Weds and Thurs afternoons respectively when they're closed.

Hi James,


The last round of cuts saw the sub-PO on Melbourne Grove get the chop, with the family-owned shop closing as a result. Today, like many days, the queue at the Lordship Lane PO was out of the door, even with four counters open. If the LL PO closes, too, I'm not sure there will be a service within reasonable walking distance of this end of ED. I can understand why the PO/politicians might put the branch into a shop to save money, by selling a prime site and franchising the business, but why can?t they be straight about how local services will suffer further?

Appreciate that Lordship Lane Post Office is running at a loss, and I agree with James that any business that incorporates PO counters would want to do so to see a profit. Perhaps as has been suggested moving the PO counter into a shop maybe the answer, but can't think of any business locally that is big enough to incorporate PO counters into (perhaps one of the large estate agents may be interested?????)


Closure of the LL PO will leave residents and businesses with no post office within easy walking distamce. It will further lengthen the already existing long queues at this post office and merely move them to others in the area, so adding to the existing queues elsewhere. This happened when the Woodvale Post Office closed with the nearest PO being in Forest Hill Road.


Both in Forest Hill and Lewisham the PO counter went into a branch of WH Smiths, but Lordship Lane does not have one and the branch in Peckham closed. Can't see WH Smiths opening on the Lane.


Have councillors approached the PO to see what alternatives can be suugested/proposed?

The closure and if a replacement isn't found will put added pressure on the excellent 369 LL PO.


I've used the PO's at retail outlets, such as the one inside WHSmith at Forest Hill and have found it better than the main PO here which is always busy as mentioned no thanks to closing the Melbourne Road sub PO. Those inside WHSmith stores also stay open until 5.30pm on Saturdays.


As long as the PO has adequate space in another retail outlet, this is preferable than not having the service at all.

Re The post from James Barber about the small post office near the library. There is often a queue and usually only one window open and they do close at lunchtime.They will only take three parcels at one time.However the people behind the counter are always helpful.

Hi dbboy,

Yes, we have a commitment fro mthe post office that any replacement will be very local to the current one. Wil lprovide at least the same services as the current one. And they're not clear that they will find an alternative in which case the current one stays.

BUT if it stays making a loss then any change of government could see the current guarantees evaporate.

So we need a long term solution to gurantee Post office services in the heart of East Dulwich.

It was a possible idea that in principle could be considered as an alternative may enable the post office to remain. Clearly in making a loss, any venture to either incorporate the PO or be a PO with other added services would neeed to be profitable. The first thing to do would be to look at the PO in its current operation and see how the losses are incurred and what changes can be made to reduce and negate these I'm TRYING to be creative, apologoies if you do not see the merits of this, but at least it's an idea.


Let's see how James and the other councillors feel about the suggestion or if they have any other ideas. It's better to try and fail rather than do nothing at all and lose a vital resource.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I would disagree that the tables outside the Blue Brick bothered nobody. They were not within the cafe's curtilage (one table was even placed on the other side of the road!) but on a narrow public footpath where pedestrians have a "public right of way". Added to that, some customers rearranged the tables so the footpath was blocked completely. 
    • Walking last Friday early evening anywhere near where the bottom end of Lordship Lane meets the Goose Green roundabout, one would have been directly confronted - as I was - with this scene: Outside the East Dulwich Tavern an impenetrable phalanx of pushing yobs, shouty louts and selfish yahoos pressed outward from the open doors of this establishment, past the curtilage (the land in front of and owned by the business), all across the public right of way, to the kerbside. This was the situation all the way along, end to end. I watched as passersby, old people, children, parents with buggies, people just going about their business, were forced by these booze-sucking bellowing scumbags onto the road - where, at that hour, traffic rushed endlessly off the roundabout. We have, I realised, somehow become so used to this revolting spectacles as to believe it to be inevitable. It is not. This is why I'm dropping this post. Enough really is enough. This roiling boozy blockade represents a total failure by all the responsible authorities - the licencing authority, for example - but most of all (yet once more, again, as ever), by Southwark Council. Two very different comparisons to give you some perspective: 1. The Kings Head pub on the corner of Albermarle and Stafford Streets, London SW1. Here too, patrons like to drink and chat outside on a warm evening - why should they not. But here, on the latter side a line marks the curtilage on the pavement. Drinkers remain, respectfully, in good order, within the line, watched, quietly and carefully, by a security guard. I wager good money this arrangement is a condition of this pub's licence. 2. The Blue Brick is a cafe in the quiet backstreets of East Dulwich, on the corners of Fellbrigg and Shawbury Roads. Until a few months ago, about half its covers were tables out on the pavement. They bothered nobody. Oh! But they extended all of several centimetres too far into the footpath, so into fearless action swang Southwark Council officers - and now these tables are gone. Result, eh? "Well you see," some wiseacre said to me, "There needs to be a complaint." Not actually true, but for sure this is all too often how local authorities get pushed to do what they should be doing. Hard to think why a complaint trumps, say (and god forbid!) a child being injured on the road. In which circumstance, of course!, Southwark would swing into noisy, virtue-signalling, belated action. But in any case let this post be considered a big, very definite COMPLAINT about this prolonged abuse of our public right of way. I invite readers who agree with me to add their voices. Oh, and all those wee local ward councillors might get off their chufties, defy their party managers, and actually help sort this scandal out. Thanks for reading, Lee Scoresby
    • Hi there, I saw that Google lists the park opening time as 7:30am, but I was wondering if it might actually open earlier than that - maybe anyone who’s out running early or passing by has noticed?  
    • We are thrilled to announce that Little Stars Creche in Dulwich will be opening its doors on 28th April and we would love to invite you and your little ones to an open day where you can meet our team and visit our wonderful setting.  Little Stars is a fun creative space for children aged 2 to 4 years to enjoy whilst parents and carers get some well needed time to catch up on life! We are so excited to bring this much-needed service to the community, and we want to thank all the wonderful parents and carers for participating in our recent survey. Your feedback was invaluable in shaping Little Stars and ensuring it meets the needs of local families. For full information about Little Stars and a detailed schedule please visit our webpage here: Little Stars Crèche We can’t wait to meet you and your little stars soon!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...