Jump to content

EDF General Election Poll - 2024  

124 members have voted

  1. 1. Which political party will you vote for at the upcoming general election on 4th July 2024?

    • Christian Peoples Alliance
      2
    • Conservative
      9
    • Green
      28
    • Labour
      64
    • Liberal Democrats
      10
    • Reform UK
      8
    • Workers Party
      3

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 03/07/24 at 22:59

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator

Hi all,

With 2024 General Election fast approaching, I thought it would be useful to have a poll to measure local support for each party.

For simplicity, only the parties standing in the Lewisham West and East Dulwich consistency are listed as options. This is a new constituency for 2024 and covers East Dulwich, Honor Oak, Forest Hill, Sydenham and some parts of Nunhead. You can check which constituency you live in using this page.

I would appreciate if only Lewisham West and East Dulwich residents cast their vote in this (although obviously there is no way of us verifying this!).

This is an anonymous poll and your forum username will not be recorded against your vote.

 

Click here to find our more information about each candidate running for election in Lewisham West and East Dulwich.

 

Here are the current active topics on EDF where the 2024 Election is being discussed. Feel free to share your opinions here.

 

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Administrator

Final Results (more info here)

Party Candidate % votes on EDF Poll % share in Election
Christian Peoples Alliance Katherine Hortense 1.61% 0.70%
Conservative and Unionist Party Christine Wallace 7.26% 7.50%
Green Party Callum Fowler 22.58% 19.40%
Labour Party Ellie Reeves 51.61% 59%
Liberal Democrats Josh Matthews 8.06% 7.70%
Reform UK Marian Lynn Newton 6.45% 4.80%
Workers Party of Britain Gwenton Dennis Sloley 2.42% 0.90%

The EDF poll was broadly inline with the election result!

  • Thanks 1
  • Joe unlocked this topic
  • Joe unpinned this topic

If anything it just suggests that EDF 'members' are very broadly representative of participative electors in ED, remembering that they are drawn from a somewhat wider universe. But it might mean that another 'political' poll on the forum might, just might, be broadly representative of more general ED political views. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It’s a 4 year old on a bike do you really think he is going 15mph. Grown adults complaining about a child who probably isn’t able to string a few sentences together says a lot about the people in this forum. If this member was hit from behind the father was probably walking behind the bike so I don’t get the point of stretching out an overreaction from a child in Nursery bumping into you. Grow up Obviously a four year old should be cycling on the pavement.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • Completely jobless and lunatic behaviour coming on a forum and complaining about a 4 year old and the child’s bike riding skills. Honestly grow up
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...