Jump to content

EDF General Election Poll - 2024  

124 members have voted

  1. 1. Which political party will you vote for at the upcoming general election on 4th July 2024?

    • Christian Peoples Alliance
      2
    • Conservative
      9
    • Green
      28
    • Labour
      64
    • Liberal Democrats
      10
    • Reform UK
      8
    • Workers Party
      3

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 03/07/24 at 22:59

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator

Hi all,

With 2024 General Election fast approaching, I thought it would be useful to have a poll to measure local support for each party.

For simplicity, only the parties standing in the Lewisham West and East Dulwich consistency are listed as options. This is a new constituency for 2024 and covers East Dulwich, Honor Oak, Forest Hill, Sydenham and some parts of Nunhead. You can check which constituency you live in using this page.

I would appreciate if only Lewisham West and East Dulwich residents cast their vote in this (although obviously there is no way of us verifying this!).

This is an anonymous poll and your forum username will not be recorded against your vote.

 

Click here to find our more information about each candidate running for election in Lewisham West and East Dulwich.

 

Here are the current active topics on EDF where the 2024 Election is being discussed. Feel free to share your opinions here.

 

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Administrator

Final Results (more info here)

Party Candidate % votes on EDF Poll % share in Election
Christian Peoples Alliance Katherine Hortense 1.61% 0.70%
Conservative and Unionist Party Christine Wallace 7.26% 7.50%
Green Party Callum Fowler 22.58% 19.40%
Labour Party Ellie Reeves 51.61% 59%
Liberal Democrats Josh Matthews 8.06% 7.70%
Reform UK Marian Lynn Newton 6.45% 4.80%
Workers Party of Britain Gwenton Dennis Sloley 2.42% 0.90%

The EDF poll was broadly inline with the election result!

  • Thanks 1
  • Joe unlocked this topic
  • Joe unpinned this topic

If anything it just suggests that EDF 'members' are very broadly representative of participative electors in ED, remembering that they are drawn from a somewhat wider universe. But it might mean that another 'political' poll on the forum might, just might, be broadly representative of more general ED political views. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...