Jump to content

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Jenijenjen said:

Never used to see foxes in East Dulwich when I first moved here 40 years ago. Nor did I see them when I grew up in West London.

There were definitely foxes here more than 40 years ago. There was a den in the old chapel waste ground in Hindmans Road and then when they demolished the prefabs, the foxes “took over” the remaining site until the houses were built.

 

  • Like 1
1 hour ago, lilolil said:

There were definitely foxes here more than 40 years ago. There was a den in the old chapel waste ground in Hindmans Road and then when they demolished the prefabs, the foxes “took over” the remaining site until the houses were built.

 

Thanks for that. I was probably walking around in a world of my own ...

I think foxes have been around us for as long as the difference now is they do not stay away and hidden until night.  They are no longer as timid as they once were.  Apparently during a research project there is a clear difference in brain sizes of rural and urban foxes.  Rural foxes having the larger brains.  🦊🦊🦊

On 28/06/2024 at 09:52, lilolil said:

There were definitely foxes here more than 40 years ago. There was a den in the old chapel waste ground in Hindmans Road and then when they demolished the prefabs, the foxes “took over” the remaining site until the houses were built.

 

Ha that’s weird, Hindmans road was literally where I lived (with lots of foxes!) but I just moved to France yesterday. Miss the beautiful foxes already! They were so chill around our cats, it was very sweet 🦊 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Ah yes, of course, I'd forgotten that the cases will be heard by judges and not Mags. But how does losing juries mean less work for barristers, though? Surely all the other problems (no courtrooms, loos, witnesses etc etc) that stop cases going to trial, or slow trials down - will still exist? Then they'll still be billing the same? 
    • It's not magistrates that are needed, it's judges and they will rattle through these cases whether the loos are working or not. Barristers get a brief fee and a day rate. 
    • I'm not sure that's true. I don't know how they bill (and I might be wrong) but I doubt they get paid each time they turn up at court and a witness or defendant fails to show, or the printer's broken, or  the loos have flooded, or whatever. I think most remaining criminal barristers and solicitors these days (now there's no money in it) genuinely care about the justice system and would like to see trials coming to court quicker, but not like this. Plus, I don't see how these measures will help - they won't suddenly magic up all the courtrooms the system demands (that prev govts shut down), and do we even have enough mags to pick up all the extra non jury cases that will arise? Picking and panelling juries isn't what's causing the delay in trials going to court.     
    • Well, this is it isn’t  it?    this does see to be an ongoing problem since oooh I’m gonna say 2016. For some reason  governments playing to a populist right wing media without foundations in reality, all in the hope of a supportive headline that will never come 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...