Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We design and manage the construction of individually crafted buildings and interiors, with over 15 years of experience working with historic and existing buildings as well as new bespoke homes. We work collaboratively with our clients, ensuring that the brief is understood and providing guidance through each step of the design and construction process. Our designs focus on the quality of materials, light and space, responding to the brief, context, and budget, while seeking to add a touch of beauty along the way.

spacer.png

Phone Number: 07825 698749
Email Address: [email protected]
Website: https://lendelstephens.com

View full listing

  • 2 weeks later...

Stephen helped us completely renovate our, then, very delapidated, end of terrace, 1930s house that we had bought close to Peckham Rye park. This also included remdelling the ground floor, a loft extension and garden redesign and landscaping. Stephen has supported us right from the beginning through design, tendering and the project management of all of the works.

 

Stephen is very easy to work with, punctual and a good communicator who combines design flair with meticulous attention to detail and cost control. He is was as happy helping us realise our own ideas as providing his own. He also had a lovely way of gently steering us clear when we come up with interesting but impractical propositions. Having never employed an architect before it was also a great relief to be provided with all the details of Stephens fees up front.

 

Stephen came up with a very interestingly shaped, rear and side, ground floor extension that has provided us with a spacious, light flooded, kitchen lounge, a utility room and a ground floor bathroom. He also found ways of greatly expanding and increasing the use we could make of our loft space. This now incorporates a large bedroom, bathroom, extra storage space in the eaves and fold out balconies with views across Peckham Rye park to the Shard.

 

Given its dilapidated state the house needed new everything. Stephen guided us in upgrading the existing building to modern standards. This included: externally insulating the solid brick exterior walls; insulating the ground floor, floors; and  switching from a gas boiler to a green energy efficient electric Air Source Heat Pump backed up by roof mounted PV solar cells.

 

Whilst, in the past, we had ourselves renovated our previous houses we realised that the complexity of our new project was a major step change. So, we also employed Stephen to project manage everything from beginning to end. This was invaluable as project management turned out to be a major undertaking. Stephen: kept track of what had and had not been done; checked on the quality; clarified and challenged builders invoices; and redesigned and re-specified as our ideas changed or new structural problems were unearthed.  Stephens calm, meticulous attention to detail meant we always knew what was happening, what needed to be done and that Stephen would ensure any problems that arose would be sorted. He always went the extra mile.

 

Given our experience we would thoroughly recommend Stephen to anyone.

  • 1 month later...

Stephen was fantastic to work with and helped us fully renovate our Lordship Lane house. The property had hardly been adjusted since 1930, and we completed a full renovation with a rear extension and loft conversion.

We interviewed quite a few architects in the early stages, and Stephen was by far the easiest to meet. I remember him carefully considering the original details of the property and then offering a future vision – all in our early interactions. His quiet confidence made it very easy to engage him, and I would recommend any project at least meet him as the initial contact was worthwhile.

My wife and I were quite naïve about home building at the time. Stephen was able to guide us through the process, first through the design phase and then planning, tendering, and adjusting the design to meet budget requirements.

Stephen has a gentle coaching manner that worked well for us as clients. I also witnessed it being a very effective communication method for the many other professionals involved throughout the build. We maintained our contact with him throughout the build, which was a good decision. His methodical process protected us from time and budget overruns. It was reassuring as clients to watch the oversight Stephen provided with contractors.

Stephen had an ability to understand our points of anxiousness as clients. He would pre-empt scenarios by explaining what to expect and putting plans in place before problems arose – quite a skill!

Our home is more than we could have hoped for. It is a very practical space, with family life emphasised by the design. Along with the practicality, we also enjoy the subtle beauty in the features Stephen envisioned that we could not have planned ourselves. Design choices he advocated for, which I did not appreciate in the early stages, certainly shine through now that we live in the space.

Subtle details such as the positioning of light, the lines of sight, and even the cladding lining up perfectly are things I now enjoy living in the property. I can look at them with a sense of contentment, knowing we have given the property another life.

We enthusiastically recommend Stephen for any building work and suggest any project around the Dulwich area would benefit from at least an initial contact with him.

IMG_1430.JPG

IMG_1428.JPG

IMG_1419.JPG

IMG_1418.JPG

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Approved scheme usually have three years to start. Start can be pretty minuscule in practice.
    • Ofcom states how to formally complain - https://www.ofcom.org.uk/make-a-complaint/complain-about-postal-services/royal-mail/ 1st step Royal Mail - https://www.royalmail.com/sites/default/files/Complaint_Handling_Process_AUG_2019.pdf  03457 740 740 https://help.royalmail.com/s/contactsupport/wheresmyitem Failing that - you can seek compensation form Royal Mail - https://personal.help.royalmail.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/325 I've never needed to tried these - so if anyone has please let us know. 2nd step Postal Redress - https://www.cedr.com/consumer/postrs/overview/
    • We receive (should receive) 20-30 items of post a week, some subscription magazines, catalogues and (about a third) normal business mail (personal mail is far less frequent, save over Christmas and birthdays).  This tends to arrive in only two (more frequently one) delivery. Magazines are invariably late, often up to a week late. Not good for political weeklies. This has been my 'steady state' position following much worse frequency on the closure of the real ED Delivery Office, and of course Covid. There seems little point in complaining any longer - to anyone. There will be a sudden flurry of mail delivered, of course, in the few days after an MP intervention, and then it falls back into rubbish deliveries. It is a combination of senior management focus on high(er) value parcel and special delivery items (which I do get more regularly) which is a management decision, under-employment (vacancies) of posties and, I believe, extremely poor local management of what resources  Royal Mail actually has in Peckham. I don't now believe it is curable. I do believe that no one in Royal Mail management gives a sh*t!
    • The US has been one of the most dynamic high growth economies for several years. They have planning zones. The two are not mutually exclusive.  Two recent mobile phone mast applications in the area. Both of such terribly poor quality they were refused. They both broke the code of conduct all mobile operators singed up to. The agents were just trying it on. So huge cost of repetition and low productivity. Planning is blamed but it's just shoddy work.  Recent case of the new Kent Thame tunnel talking about £200m of planning costs - which turned out to be design, project planning and planning. I would suggest mostly the former.  It is lazy to blame planning process and generally by those who wont a no holes bar approach for their schemes without any consideration of the opportunity cost imposed on others.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...