Jump to content

Recommended Posts

College Ward Cllrs Helen Hayes and Andy Simmons are very aware of this. Thames Water have not been very forthcoming over when the water supply is likely to be restored. Helen has notified Council Officers about the situation, particularly as vulnerable, elderly and disabled residents may have difficulty in accessing the bottled water and standpipe.

Renata

Local Authorities have a set procedure to respond to level 3 and level 4 warm weather alerts. It would be worth trying to contact Sarah McClinton - Southwark Social Services as she can issue instructions to social workers to look up vulnerable adults in the area who may need additional help in accessing water and water supplies. Failing her - try Ray Boyce.

I've only just picked this up after spending the night in hospital.

I'll try and find out when it will be repaired what TW are doing to tell affected people.


I've asked that the next Dulwich Community Council, which sadly isnt until September, thaT thames Water be invited to explain what is going on generally and why they've failed to responded properly to this and other issues.

  • 2 months later...
Went out at 0945 and it was slightly bubbling. Came back at 1530 and it was much worse and no sign of workmen. They don't need permission to dig for this type of work so they just deal with the immediate problem- then another leak may appear so they dig again etc. so I have been reliably informed
It's always in pretty much the same spot there. Was quite substantial when I came back on the school run. Can drivers please be aware of the water too. So many purposely (yes, purposely) drive through it causing massive splashes when people are walking out of LL estate. This is illegal and totally uncalled for, there is plenty of space in the road there to not hit the surface water.

GinaG3 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's always in pretty much the same spot there.

> Was quite substantial when I came back on the

> school run. Can drivers please be aware of the

> water too. So many purposely (yes, purposely)

> drive through it causing massive splashes when

> people are walking out of LL estate. This is

> illegal and totally uncalled for, there is plenty

> of space in the road there to not hit the surface

> water.


I got splashed at the bus stop opposite Overhill Road on Thursday thanks to a speeding car. It's also formed a large puddle on LL outside the estate which normally happens after heavy rainfall with rain and a stream of water going into a drain outside Byron Court.

Were the blokes standing round actual workmen or just passers by?


I walked past there 4 times on saturday, the first about 10:15am, saw a red van of Clancy Docwra parked there. Driver having a nap inside. Walked past again about 11:45, driver awake now, but still sitting inside his car.


Walked past again around 15:30, the van was now parked facing the opposite direction, driver inside.I got the impression he probably went for lunch and came back to sit in his van possibly charging the council per hour he is sat there.


Temporary lights causing all manor of traffic turned on yesterday (monday) but so far I havent seen any actual work being done, considering the road started leaking around wednesday/thursday last week, you wonder what they are doing.

Were the blokes standing round actual workmen or just passers by?


Well, definitely not passers-by (all in overalls, boots, high-vis jackets etc) but also not doing any actual work when I went past. Sounds from what Penguin38 says that they got going a bit later in the evening. It was more the comical shaking of heads that was going on - like a bad sitcom.

According to Thames' website, the problem has now disappeared. There's a report of a leak on Overhill, and they're sending a technician.


According to public.londonworks.gov.uk, there's a "Main Clamp 6 to 12" Cway in Carriageway" which'll be going on till Friday. Presumably that's what the current round of single-lane action is about. Potentially more interesting is the expedition to "Investigate and repair leak on 42" main" up Fireman's Alley, which is scheduled to go on till the Friday after, thrillingly close to the telephone exchange.


Given all these pipes were tediously upgraded well within living memory, expressly to reduce leaks and at our considerable expense, I have asked Thames the relevant question. I'm sure a helpfully constructive reply is on its way.

At last nights Dulwich Community Council we had three Thames Water officials talking about the previous Underhill/Lordship Lane burst pipe and Herne Hill.


They explained that 12 different mains pipes are in the vacinity of Underhill/Lordship Lane junction. That the burst earlier this year was of a 4" mains. But due to the very hilly nature when they reduced the pressure to keep water available for residents but reduce the damage of the gushing water that water unhill and top floor flats went of.


This latest burst is apparently a 6" mains.


They exlained that the recent (last 12 months) has seen a doubling in burst main with the cold winter, hot summer, LOTS of rain. This combination means lots of earth movement and pipes bursting.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In an area which (thank goodness) is stuffed with good and acceptable restaurants (East, West and Central Dulwich) Belair would have to be a real destination - hence I suggested the need for a very high quality offering which would encourage visitors to go in search of it. A restaurant next to a station is a very different beast than a country house down a side street. I know about it because I live, and have lived for nearly 40 years, pretty close. And I have gone there on a number of occasions in its different guises. Sometimes with great enjoyment, other times less so. But for a site like that to work it must deliver its promise, which because of the nature and cost of the site will have to be both high-end and not very crowded, which means high prices and probably aiming for at least twice the covers occupation most nights and some lunches. Frankly, it can't live on local trade alone (because there are too many good alternatives) - so it has to build a rep for people to travel there, and again and again.
    • But the bulk of the build is for student accommodation, with just 'some' affordable housing which will, if history is anything to go by, become much less once the scheme is started. Southwark has, I believe, quite a number of empty properties which are not in use. The number of people on Southwark's waiting list is frankly irrelevant to this scheme, which won't touch the surface. This isn't 'new housing' which is visible, but commercially profitable student bedsits (at least, the developers hope it will be commercially profitable). 
    • Does anyone know if Tommy Rooney is away? I have a boiler emergency and he isn't responding to messages. I don't really want to use someone I don't know, and I know Tommy is excellent!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...