Jump to content

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Dogkennelhillbilly said:

lol

"Rejoice in our socialist council, giving to the rich and taking from the poor."

 

 

I think this is known as "playing the man and not the ball". Plus, the implication that if you so much as dare to question or criticise the council, this is proof you are a gas guzzling, Tory. Come on DKH. 

I do find it odd in a cost of living crisis that our Labour Council can find millions to spend on the creation of Dulwich Square in one of the wealthiest parts of the borough. I would be less surprised but equally questioning if this had been the decision of a Tory council.

It is the council that decides and who are accountable for those decisions.
 
 

  • Haha 1
1 hour ago, first mate said:

I think this is known as "playing the man and not the ball".

lol

"being a very political politician (now Socialist not Marxist) [McCash] may just be trying to buy time, as you say, while presenting different faces and 'takes' according to his audience; has anyone else noticed how borderline besotted Margy Newens appears to be with him, when she chairs the Scrutiny sessions?"

https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/329019-southwark-wide-cpz/?do=findComment&comment=1641314

 

 

Surely you are not suggesting I have the same power, reach and influence as Cllr McAsh?
 

Cllr McAsh is, for now, the Cabinet Member in charge of the Streets for People policy, so it is legitimate to comment on how he handles the decision making process and optics around that. 
 

I think a number of us wondered why he had changed from describing himself as Marxist to socialist? It is relevant to know what ideology may be driving his political decisions.

Anyway, you still haven't revealed who"Mr One Dulwich" is? You and others have referred to this mystery individual a number of times. I am surprised you are keeping his identity under wraps.

Dulwich ward councillors are a weird mix of marxists and champagne socialists....they don't tend to mix well...and neither are really the best examples of socialism!

 

It does seem very ironic that at a time when the council was trying to convince everyone their funding was being slashed by the government that they could waste so much money on Dulwich Square...but what's that saying about socialism and how great it is until you run out of other people's money to spend.

Edited by Rockets
  • Haha 1

Given that a lot of people from right across the borough, 60% of whom don't own a car, will benefit, I would say improving the public space for all to enjoy is a great use of cash. The constant stream of people who enjoy the area as it stands - having a coffee or a picnic on the benches, meeting friends, seems to have been completely missed by the development's critics. Even in the depths of winter, I've seen young people sat out there chatting. It promises to be a great addition to the civic space.  

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
  • Agree 2

And perhaps those without a car might have wanted something, you know, a bit more accessible for those without a car...

 

Honestly....

 

It is really amazing how some will try to spin the council's obsession with wasting tax payers money on that junction as to some benefit to everyone in the borough....it's all getting a bit desperate (and laughable) now.

Edited by Rockets
On 19/08/2024 at 15:07, first mate said:

I think those in favour of LTNs, CPZ etc, have to stop framing it as a left/right thing.

lol

 

On 19/08/2024 at 17:53, first mate said:

a number of us wondered why he had changed from describing himself as Marxist to socialist? It is relevant to know what ideology may be driving his political decisions.

  

  • Thanks 1
On 20/08/2024 at 12:09, DulvilleRes said:

 Even in the depths of winter, I've seen young people sat out there chatting. It promises to be a great addition to the civic space.  

This is really seen as adequate justification for spending millions on the space? 
 
As for people across the borough visiting. Really? I just cannot see people making Dulwich Square a must see destination. They will pass through to go and visit the shops, the pub and restaurants, the parks, and the famous Picture Gallery. They will pass through because many will have to, it is one of the routes into DV.

10 hours ago, Dogkennelhillbilly said:

lol

 

  

DKH, it is the council and Cabinet member in charge wot make the policy therefore they are accountable, you cannot really get away from that, no matter how many "lols" you post 🙂
 

You still have not revealed the identity of your "Mr One Dulwich"? I have asked quite a few times now?

Edited by first mate

No it was a major access route THROUGH dv not into it. I don't need to know who one Dulwich is, I support him because he wants the junction opened up again just like me. I don't want to have a long detour just to get from one side of the village to the other.

We don't need more space for people to hang out. That's what parks and gardens are for. We don't need cafe space either. We need more road capacity for cars.

  • Haha 1
1 hour ago, malumbu said:

Heavens, views like this make it less likely that it will be reversed.  Have a walk sometime.  Buy a bicycle, we could go on a nice ride into town or Greenwich.  Get a train or bus.  I went through the transformation and thoroughly recommend it.

OMG 

Does that make you a born again cyclist preaching the gospel of Janssen ?

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_Janssen

Edited by Spartacus
On 25/08/2024 at 11:29, raptortruckman69 said:

No it was a major access route THROUGH dv not into it. I don't need to know who one Dulwich is, I support him because he wants the junction opened up again just like me. I don't want to have a long detour just to get from one side of the village to the other.

We don't need more space for people to hang out. That's what parks and gardens are for. We don't need cafe space either. We need more road capacity for cars.

I actually like this comment. It's refreshingly honest. 

On the detour point, it's around a 2 - 3 minute diversion from Townley road to the Village at most; Just to put things into perspective.

Edited by Earl Aelfheah
1 hour ago, Earl Aelfheah said:

I actually like this comment. It's refreshingly honest. 

On the detour point, it's around a 2 - 3 minute diversion from Townley road to the Village at most; Just to put things into perspective.

And all those 2-3 minute diversions for every vehicle adds to the pollution!

As does the way many generally use their vehicles, the only time some are concerned about pollution is when they are inconvenienced.

Good news, for me at least, is the new government not getting involved in Sunak's silly culture wars, car drivers vs humanity.  Worth reading beyond the second paragraph: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c9v8d4lvjryo

  • Agree 1
5 hours ago, Earl Aelfheah said:

I actually like this comment. It's refreshingly honest. 

On the detour point, it's around a 2 - 3 minute diversion from Townley road to the Village at most; Just to put things into perspective.

You're reacting to a troll who is probably someone who posts on here in a pro-LTN capacity and recently set-up a fake account to post such pearls of wisdom - the clue is in the user name!

 

And the detour argument is the most flawed logic there is and why displacement is such a huge issue with LTNs - people don't stop using their cars they just drive further, thus increasing pollution. It's the Achilles Heal of the LTN!

20 hours ago, Kathleen Olander said:

And all those 2-3 minute diversions for every vehicle adds to the pollution!

Not really. A huge number of journeys in London are very short (around a third are under 2km). Some people who may have driven to pick up a coffee from the village, will now walk. That's why traffic across the whole area actually fell.

The point is, that for those who do have to, or still want to drive, the extra time is pretty minimal. This isn't a particularly bold intervention, it's a small nudge.

The outrage at such a timid attempt at reallocate a tiny amount of public space several years on, really does tell you how out of control car dominance / entitlement has become.

Edited by Earl Aelfheah
  • Thanks 2
  • Agree 1

To correct my earlier post reporting that the Labour government was leaving it to decide to local authorities what was best, government can and should do more to encourage and enable councils to take action.  Funding will be available under sustainable transport programmes, until the last decade governments were talking the talk if not walking the walk, Earl's example above being a pretty good one, but a combination of Covid and the impact on government coffers, and Suank, reversed much of the previous commitments.

Sadly I can't give links as whatever ministers said pre 2020 is wiped off the web, there may be references in the media and you can get some stuff in the national archives.

Heaven knows what happened with regards to meeting statutory air quality roadside concentrations of pollutants.  Government was ordered to sort this out by the Supreme Court in 2015, but it has long since gone quiet from the centre. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • OK, I have been extremely stupid. This is a long and sorry saga, so unless you are into schadenfreude,  or know about laptops and might actually be able to help, you probably need to stop reading here. I got a new laptop last May, with a 2 year guarantee from John Lewis (that was my first mistake, but the laptop met all my requirements at a very good price). I hate OneDrive, and I  had been using Carbonite for backing up files.  When I got the new laptop, the files from my old laptop which had been backed up on Carbonite were downloaded onto it. For tedious reasons originally related to problems with my old laptop, files and folders were duplicated all over the place. Sorting this out wasn't top of my priorities. In an attempt to at least keep new files,  and files edited since I bought the laptop, in one place and completely separate from all the old duplicated  files, I saved them all into folders  on the SSD. However, I didn't restart the Carbonite backup, because my intention was to sort out all the duplicate files first. About a fortnight ago, I bought an external hard drive. My intention was to copy everything on the new laptop onto it before I started deleting any of the duplicate files. I hadn't done that yet because I had to finish doing my accounts and then do my online tax return. So the copying was next on my To Do list. The inevitable happened. Out of the blue, my laptop went into complete meltdown. I was editing a spreadsheet and went into settings to turn the brightness up. I checked the brightness was ok on the spreadsheet, came out of settings, and suddenly everything went black. I did all the obvious things, then googled other possible fixes, including specific to my laptop model, but nothing worked. On starting the laptop, the Lenovo logo came up, the little white circle turned round, the red light for face recognition flashed, then zilch.  But clearly it wasn't a problem with the physical screen, as it displayed the logo. It wouldn't start in safe mode either. I thought I might either have accidentally changed some setting, or else it might be connected with a recent update  I couldn't try some of the tests suggested, eg removing RAM, because anything involving physically unscrewing my laptop would invalidate the guarantee  I am a member of Which Tech, so I contacted them. Obviously their hands were rather tied as they couldn't connect remotely to the laptop as there was no display. They said I couldn't have clicked on some other setting by mistake, as the display section only related to the display. They said they thought it was probably an issue with either the operating system or the mother board, or a component of them. They said it should be possible to identify the fault without losing my data. Given the involvement of John Lewis, I said I thought this was unlikely, as they had once told me to do an unnecessary factory reset on my old laptop and told me this wouldn't lose my data, which I had queried at the time,  and had to pay me compensation. So at this point I phoned John Lewis, to be told a repair would take "up to 28 working days" and no they wouldn't supply a replacement laptop during that time. I decided to take the laptop to John Lewis rather than have it collected, so their tech people could look at it first. So then the JL tech person said I must have clicked on  Bitlocker by mistake and locked myself out out of the laptop. I thought this was highly unlikely. Anyway, pursuing this line of thought did not help, and she was still unable to get into it by putting in the Bitlocker code. So then we had the data saving conversation. She said the company the laptop would go to was approved by Lenovo. She said they would do a factory reset first regardless. I said could they not try to identify the fault first. She said no. I said could I not request that they did. She said no. She said I could pay £150 for data retrieval, which could be done first. She said it would require removing the hard drive. She said if anybody else did this it would invalidate the guarantee. So. I have brought the laptop home to think things over. But I'm not willing to pay £150,  because the important files I can reconstruct by other means, and I have hard copies of most of them, it's just a time consuming pain. I have contacted Carbonite to see if they have any way of backing up the non backed up data even though I can't get into the laptop. If you have managed to reach the end of this post, congratulations 🤣 and do you have any bright ideas? I have typed all this on my mobile. It has taken a very very long time 🤣
    • I thought I saw some TW workmen there when it first happened last weekend but maybe it's too big for them to fix and they can't switch the mains off there without shutting all the businesses down.
    • You copy the address in the URL and then paste here  
    • Off the top of my head, there are notice boards in Sainsbury's and the library where small businesses can advertise, not to overlook the internet and forums such as this which these days is where very many go to first for small business information. I find it strange that you are mounting this crusade to allow small businesses the right to advertise in the Community noticeboards when there are so many alternatives these days. As I said before, the Community noticeboards are too small to accommodate commercial notices and would probably overwhelm and obscure the NFP notices. For info, during the week there is just as broad a mix passing by the NXR boards as the one by the station
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...