Jump to content

is it OK to run 1,000 litres of tap water per hour on garden in full sun


Recommended Posts

We haven't had a hosepipe ban yet. So what does the panel think about this way of using up the wet winter's reservoir supplies?

Should we encourage all gardeners to do their watering at dawn or dusk, as TW suggests?

How to frame such a request, so that it gets across positively?

Some people refuse to curb wastefulness until a regulation is imposed on them.

Not convinced this is the best way to achieve wiser use of resources, am interested in a non-regulatory approach.

Certainly not, especially, if like me you have a water meter.

We had to have a new water main installed a couple of years ago and Thames Water insisted on fitting a water meter.

Since then our water bills have more than doubled.

fl0wer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> We haven't had a hosepipe ban yet. So what does

> the panel think about this way of using up the wet

> winter's reservoir supplies?

> Should we encourage all gardeners to do their

> watering at dawn or dusk, as TW suggests?

> How to frame such a request, so that it gets

> across positively?

> Some people refuse to curb wastefulness until a

> regulation is imposed on them.

> Not convinced this is the best way to achieve

> wiser use of resources, am interested in a

> non-regulatory approach.



Well, it seems the answer is in the question. You're interested in non-regulatory approaches, but you admit that some individuals will not bring their over-usage under control until regulations are imposed on them.


So, what's wrong with imposing regulations? If universally installing water meters leads to universally unacceptably high bills, then either everyone is using too much water, or we're being over-charged (or both).


In highly developed areas where water is at a premium (eg, California or Texas), it's quite common to have both water meters and public service campaigns offering advice on saving water. Also, local governments may offer guidelines or even laws about water consumption (eg, only using hosepipes on certain days etc). In the private sector there is an economic drive for water-saving devices, so these become cheaper with more options available too.


Are you not interested in regulations because you believe the government would not install/enforce them? Hence just looking for community/civic ways to teach good water usage?

Yesterday nearby, 3 hours of hosepipe watering took place, all the time on a garden fully lit by sunshine. That would be 3,000 litre bottles of drinking water. The rest of the day, when it was shady and the ground & plants could have benefitted from the water, the hosepipe went back in the shed. The hired gardener in charge knows that watering's hardly absorbed in hot sun, because polite conversation took place about it last week. As good neighbours we could help the [disabled] householder if they'd let us do the watering at another time of day, an offer that is still open although not taken up yet. I think there's probably no water meter - along this terrace our buildings have old hidden pipework and TW can't install them.


So I posted to see if anyone on the forum has any suggestions.


It seems one the best ways for a thing to alter is through change of what's considered acceptable, public opinion [- witness what happened to the fashion for real fur coats].


But in green matters, such as water conservation, there's a complex set of expectations. We saw so much rainfall this spring the reservoirs must have filled up, we say. Many people reason that once the high rates are paid, they've actually bought a right to limitless supplies. Lots of us in the UK enjoy frequent baths, generous powershowers & washing machines, rituals of jet cleaning the car and patio - and sprinkling lawns with pure water through a noonday heatwave delighting that there's no hosepipe ban.

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm on a water meter - but don't consciously limit

> water - not extravagant with it either.


A lot of people are now, and that's fine. I have no objection to people 'wasting' water if they're paying for it, and besides, we're in the wrong part of the world for 'drought' to mean very much. I know the water companies make a big deal of it, but that's only because the alternative is fixing leaks or mending reservoirs, and they're not too fond of either, except as an excuse to hoist the charges.


Excessive watering isn't entirely neutral, admittedly. It can, like a leaky water pipe, provoke the roots of street trees into committing sins of subsidence. But that's rare, tends to be very local, and street trees are usually managed well-enough for size not to be much of a problem.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In an area which (thank goodness) is stuffed with good and acceptable restaurants (East, West and Central Dulwich) Belair would have to be a real destination - hence I suggested the need for a very high quality offering which would encourage visitors to go in search of it. A restaurant next to a station is a very different beast than a country house down a side street. I know about it because I live, and have lived for nearly 40 years, pretty close. And I have gone there on a number of occasions in its different guises. Sometimes with great enjoyment, other times less so. But for a site like that to work it must deliver its promise, which because of the nature and cost of the site will have to be both high-end and not very crowded, which means high prices and probably aiming for at least twice the covers occupation most nights and some lunches. Frankly, it can't live on local trade alone (because there are too many good alternatives) - so it has to build a rep for people to travel there, and again and again.
    • But the bulk of the build is for student accommodation, with just 'some' affordable housing which will, if history is anything to go by, become much less once the scheme is started. Southwark has, I believe, quite a number of empty properties which are not in use. The number of people on Southwark's waiting list is frankly irrelevant to this scheme, which won't touch the surface. This isn't 'new housing' which is visible, but commercially profitable student bedsits (at least, the developers hope it will be commercially profitable). 
    • Does anyone know if Tommy Rooney is away? I have a boiler emergency and he isn't responding to messages. I don't really want to use someone I don't know, and I know Tommy is excellent!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...