Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Right -- it is pretty simple. A real lynchmob, one with pitchforks and flaming torches is, of course, NOT the done thing.


But a large group of people irritated with these guys, deciding to get together to mount concerted pressure on the authorities, is very much the done thing, and anybody who diagrees can go stuff themsleves.


If enough people are concerned, and complain to the right people the situation will sort itelf out in one of three ways:


a) They may be moved to another house

b) They may be taked into custody for whatver police were visting with sniffer dogs for or

c) They may be issued with a loud-and-clear FIFO ultimatum that gets them to see sense and behave...


Whichever outcome happens depends entirely on the evidence that comes to light when all the complaints are looked at, and the reaction the residents have when approprate authorites, spurred by concened neighbours, get their fingers out and do something.


So instead of spending our time airing our points of view in public, why don't the people who want to create peace and quiet on the street get in touch with each other and all arrange to send letters of complaint to the right people, making fair and measured points about the unacceptable nature of these people's behaviour.


And we can leave the others to compare their own liberalisms and comment on articles that have interestd them in the latest edition of The New Statesman.



(Edited for punctuation)

Good point Jeremy, perhaps one or 2 of them are ill, and others visit? Perhaps they are all just horrid people for no good reason, but I doubt it. I would have thought the house is council property though isn't it?


Shaggy you are spot on in one sense, "a large group of people irritated with these guys getting together to mount concerted pressure on the council and police to sort these people out is very much the done thing" is of course fair enough, but the attitudes shown by some on here are sick, and I am not Mr Liberal.


Anyway, I'm off to a taxidermist to get myself stuffed.

Exactly. The reason why these tenants have not been moved somewhere else is because residents, neighbours are too wimpy to put in complaints with the police and the council. The complaints as I have explained to many of you are anonymous so people are being really really wimpy. I am more than happy to share contact details of officials that people should get in touch with.


The police and the council cannot do anything if people do not complain...


So get in touch with me via private messaging or shut up and stop whinging.

  • Administrator

ok, this thread is officially a pain in the backside. I get complaints about its content and I get complaints about it being curtailed so I am drawling the line.


I am going to ask people to please let this thread finish. In fact have now decided to implement the newly invented "Whatley Road rule" which means that when people's attitudes to individuals get out of hand and something need to be done the thread will be locked at my discretion. This rule will hardly ever be used, just when I feel that I need an excuse to bring this house to order.


East Dulwich is a small(ish) place, talk of lynch mobs and direct action against people is not what (our) decent society does these days. There are proper channels to get things sorted, please use them, you may not like them but I recommend you use them. The forum is meant to be a fun and useful place, this discussion is neither fun or useful anymore. I do not want it being used as a cesspit for breeding loathing and bad shit about local people.


I hope you understand and thank you for using the forum.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I went to France recently and in the city I visited there were large billboards on the main streets urging people to stop their dogs from messing on the streets and in a little park a sign said something to the effect that this park was built for your enjoyment not as a dumping ground for dog mess. There were also big signs about not fly tipping. I wonder if councils are too worried about offending dog owners by making a fuss about this major problem. I was a dog owner for many years, got free bags from the council and there were even bins around then.
    • I was also woken by this. It happened in two bursts, which felt even more anti social.
    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...