Jump to content

Recommended Posts

But Streatham can't be tweaked because it has been withdrawn completely, the signs and cameras come down over the next two weeks (how much tax payers money has been wasted) and the cameras were switched off yesterday to allow traffic to flow again.

What does that tell you? Clearly the council realised there was no tweak that was going to fix it.

It was the sheer number of vehicles being forced down the Streatham High Road AFTER the LTNs went in that was the problem....thay pesky displacement side-effect of every LTN at play again there.

Perhaps you would care to share why you think the Streatham LTN failed (except the roadworks of course given you were citing that as just one reason- and not because that's what you had heard the mayor and council blame it on) 😉

BTW the numbers of cars have been decreasing year on year in London and have been for some time (and this was happening long before the LTNs).

  • Agree 1

Lambeth press release is that it is suspended: https://love.lambeth.gov.uk/streatham-wells-a23-update/

Mayor Khan says it has been suspended: https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/sadiq-khan-streatham-wells-lambeth-council-ltn-low-traffic-neighbourhood-suspended-b1144176.html

The Telegraph report that it has been scrapped. You can make your own minds up 😃

Malumbu, you're lapping up the council spin (to be fair you're amongst friends though on here).

The council may be using the term suspended to save face but the cameras and signage will be removed in two weeks and people were notified that from yesterday the cameras will no longer fine people for using tne roads that were closed.

Removal of the cameras and signage is not a suspension......

 

As I was saying Labour councils are never very good at admitting they got something wrong..."sorry seems to be the hardest word"....;-)

 

Edited by Rockets
  • Agree 1

What will be instructive, is how many of those posting concerned pictures on social media of rush hour congestion on Streatham High Road, will continue to do so now that they've been successful in ensuring there is also traffic on side streets. In other neighbourhoods where LTNs have been removed and main road traffic congestion has remained high (such as Tooting), all the 'anti-LTN' people who claimed to be desperately concerned about it, oddly disappeared (leaving congestion on main roads and on residential side streets, with no new answers). 

Edited by Earl Aelfheah

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I believe that Crown Post Offices are normally owned by the Post Office, and are frequently in valuable high street sites, so I would not be surprised if their sale value (or rentals to be derived if not sold) would be enticing, particularly for those offices running at slim or no profit margins. Happy to be proven wrong, of course. 
    • The name has got a 50s feel about it so in my mind it’s for older people who have very specific concerns. Nothing wrong with that. 
    • There is also one for Goose green https://www.police.uk/pu/your-area/metropolitan-police-service/goose-green/?yourlocalpolicingteam=your-team Disclaimer: only passing on what I have found by searching. No involvement in organising it.  
    • It is a challenge.  These sorts of services are increasingly expensive to deliver as fewer and fewer people use them.  Most people don't want to have to go back to using their lunch hour to queue up at the bank or Post Office.  So the options  are - reduce the service, make it more expensive or the tax payer subsidises it.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...