Jump to content

Recommended Posts

And if they are indeed trapping foxes at Goodrich, what happens ot the foxes (and cats) they catch? There may be concerns about potential harm to children from foxes on its premises, but it doesn't sound like they're dealing with the issue properly


Also intersted to see some of the responses to the OP. I thought that the lesson that 'we need to listen to children' had been well learned by now.

Angusvanfrehley Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Small world.... I was at a bbq today and I was

> introduced to someone who happens to be a member

> of staff at Goodrich, so I just outright asked

> them about the trapping, alleged or otherwise. The

> person confirmed it as fact and informed me that

> there had been about five or six foxes trapped to

> their knowledge and also one, possibly two

> domestic cats.


Was this happening on school land under direction of the school? I still find it hard to believe tbh.

will report this trapping through proper channels, have school got permission to trap foxes, how do they "dispose of them", how long do they leave these poor things before dealing with, who is it that deals with them, IF these reports are true this may be a serious case of abuse, torture, will be calling scool first thing to ascertain if true.

If this all happens to be true, it doesn't sound like the situation is being dealt with properly at all.


& I think it's completely inappropriate for children of such a young age to be so easily exposed to such a thing. Shame on this school if this does happen to be true, they are aware of what's taking place on their premises & are not doing anything about it.


...I'd be traumatized & wouldn't want to go back to at least that school either!


Angusvanfrehley I do find your second post a tad bit frustrating. It would be nice if you actually responded to some of the questions you have gotten from making this post rather than escalate something that may or may not even be true... Just a thought.

susiq Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> will report this trapping through proper channels,

> have school got permission to trap foxes, how do

> they "dispose of them", how long do they leave

> these poor things before dealing with, who is it

> that deals with them, IF these reports are true

> this may be a serious case of abuse, torture, will

> be calling scool first thing to ascertain if true.



Did you reach the school?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you, I will be vigilant
    • @Sue said: nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? This is the point. Adults are meant to teach their children by example. It sounds as though the adult guardian/ father in this case did not react appropriately. Had a truly sincere apology been given,  I suspect the OP would not have posted on here. It is possible the OP snapped in the heat of the moment, but they were possibly startled because they were hit from behind? If we are startled it can be instinctive to initially react with anger. I also agree that it would be highly irresponsible to let any very young child ride or walk or do anything on a busy public street without supervision- most of all to protect the child. If in this case the child was out of the adult's line of sight that is perhaps another indication that the father needs a refresh in appropriate behaviour around a child, as well as his manners.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...