Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I was at a friends house last night for dinner and my friend and his wife were having a terrible time with their daughter, she was very upset and crying constantly.


The couple were telling me that their daughter, who is in year three at Goodrich school, was upset because during the day whilst playing, her and her friends went into a garden behind the old school house?


In the garden they found a fox that had been caught in a trap, their daughter said it was shaking,looked hungry and scared. Basically their daughter does not want to go to school today, because in her words "their hurting animals".


I realise that foxes are a pest at times and need to be relocated or put down, but really cant this be done in a better way. Surely the traps should be checked each morning and emptied if need be, before children are exposed to this kind of experience.


I am no great fan of Mr Fox, but I also feel that animals need to be treated in a humane fashion. I personally can think of much places to be than stuck in a small cage with no water, especially given the temperatures we have been experienceing the last few days.

I hope that someone from the school is reading this as they may find themselves on the wrong side of the law. No animal, even a fox, should be caused protracted or unnecessary suffering.


By law a trap must be inspected every 24 hours and the fox released or humanely dispatched. It is a bit of a grey area, but given the recent high temperatures, the ease of access to the trap, and the density of the urban fox population, it is arguable that the trap should be inspected much more regularly and that the fox should not be in the trap for very long at all.


I would contact the school and ask what is going on and who is managing the trapping.

Firstly, It might be worth clarifying what the child saw first of all, what they perceived they saw may be different from the reality.


Secondly, report it. To Southwark Council, to the RSPCA, the Police, whoever.


Thirdly, why was the child "in a garden behind the old school house"?

thread title's a bit inflammatory, isn't it?


Firstly - did the garden in question belong to the school - your post is not clear on this?


Secondly - why on earth hasn't this been taken up with the school? Why did the child not tell an adult (because she was playing aomewhere she shouldn't, is my guess - her care for animals doesn't stand up to getting into trouble herself, perhaps?) Why haven't her parents? Maybe they have but you've decided to post anyway, for some reason unclear.


I think you should get this thread removed.

Dearheart - you are acting on hearsay, you know nothing other than what someone has posted on a forum. The post was from someone who heard something from someone else's daughter. ?


I expect that if the parents are concerned they will have already raised it with the school.

The original poster sounds genuine & if they truly believe their friends daughter witnessed a trapped & distressed fox {or other animal} I don't think they would go out of their way to post with concern. Whether this is true or not I have brought this to the schools attention. If there is even the smallest chance that there is an animal trapped & can be released, I do not see a problem with acting on hearsay.


Mick Mac, If this happens to be true & nothing is being done to help the trapped animal, are you really going to tell me to mind my own business?


Although I do think this would have been better coming from the parents of the child who witnessed this.

This sounds at best odd.

Very few people licensed to catch foxes - three covering south east England I believe. They're only allowed to do this humanely and what's described doesn't sound like it was done humanely.

If correct then animal cruelty is taking place and the RSPCA should be contacted ASAP.

& with all due respect, Pickle, you do not know for sure that nothing is going on. Are you going to tell everyone to sit back & wait for a witness to come onto these forums to verify? Feel free to do that, whilst some of us try to get to the bottom of this.


The topic title is misleading & I would personally prefer not to see this escalate.

For this reason I think this thread should be removed or at the very least edited.


The parents may or may not have already been in touch with the school. Reading the original post I'm not convinced anything was done about it so I contacted the school to make sure they were aware.


''Exactly. very surprised that anyone would give this third-hand gossip the time of day.''

Jeremy, you would be surprised how much third-hand gossip has lead to real cases of animal cruelty. Some witnesses are just not comfortable with reporting it.


This may not even be true. But how many children do you know in year 3 who cannot distinguish the difference between a cat in a carrier & a fox in a trap or have been exposed to so much animal abuse that they would make something like this up just to stay at home from school?


Either way, it has been reported.




Pickle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> James, with all due respect, what's been described

> is information passed by a child to its parents,

> and then posted on an Internet forum by a friend

> of the parents. It's hardly first hand verified

> fact!

Dearheart,

I've only just seen this thread & I'm with you all the way.

By contacting either the school or RSPCA, you are at least doing something.


If it is just heresay/a mistaken child etc., then no harm done,


But to ignore it is totally heartless as it could well be true.


Surely it's better to report it & be wrong, than not report it at all.


Hopefully, somebody will keep the forum updated as to the outcome of this, because as stated on previous posts, if somebody is trapping foxes inhumanely, the RSPCA need to know about it.

I'd like to know why my message was removed from this thread??


''& with all due respect, Pickle, you do not know for sure that nothing is going on. Are you going to tell everyone to sit back & wait for a witness to come onto these forums to verify? Feel free to do that, whilst some of us try to get to the bottom of this.


The topic title is misleading & I would personally prefer not to see this escalate.


The parents may or may not have already been in touch with the school. Reading the original post I'm not convinced anything was done about it so I contacted the school to make sure they were aware.


''Exactly. very surprised that anyone would give this third-hand gossip the time of day.''

Jeremy, you would be surprised how much third-hand gossip has lead to real cases of animal cruelty. Some witnesses are just not comfortable with reporting it.


This may not even be true. But how many children do you know in year 3 who cannot distinguish the difference between a cat in a carrier & a fox in a trap or have been exposed to so much animal abuse that they would make something like this up just to stay at home from school?


Either way, it has been reported.''



I fail to see what I have written so offensive? Strange behaviour from moderators/admins.

Dearheart Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> Mick Mac, If this happens to be true & nothing is

> being done to help the trapped animal, are you

> really going to tell me to mind my own business?

>


It's what he does. Tells people what to do and what they are.

I'm a racist and bigot according to him.

Did anyone phone the school and ask them? There is a small garden in front of the Old School House within the boundary of the school premises. I am not sure if the children are allowed unsupervised access to that garden during normal playtimes, but they certainly have lessons and learn about gardening and wildlife in that garden. Whatever, I am sure a 2 minute phone call to the school - 0208 693 1050 - would have established the facts.

tomskip Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Did anyone phone the school and ask them? There is

> a small garden in front of the Old School House

> within the boundary of the school premises. I am

> not sure if the children are allowed unsupervised

> access to that garden during normal playtimes, but

> they certainly have lessons and learn about

> gardening and wildlife in that garden. Whatever, I

> am sure a 2 minute phone call to the school - 0208

> 693 1050 - would have established the facts.


Maybe you didn't read my previous post, but I did go and check this evening

Small world.... I was at a bbq today and I was introduced to someone who happens to be a member of staff at Goodrich, so I just outright asked them about the trapping, alleged or otherwise. The person confirmed it as fact and informed me that there had been about five or six foxes trapped to their knowledge and also one, possibly two domestic cats.

joom Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> tomskip Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Did anyone phone the school and ask them? There

> is

> > a small garden in front of the Old School House

> > within the boundary of the school premises. I

> am

> > not sure if the children are allowed

> unsupervised

> > access to that garden during normal playtimes,

> but

> > they certainly have lessons and learn about

> > gardening and wildlife in that garden. Whatever,

> I

> > am sure a 2 minute phone call to the school -

> 0208

> > 693 1050 - would have established the facts.

>

> Maybe you didn't read my previous post, but I did

> go and check this evening


So it seems a phone call to the school about their policy on this would indeed be a good idea.

The possibility that domestic cats may have ended up in the trap is rather worrying- I would certainly want to know more about that and whether there is any truth in the allegation.


I have noted a large number of foxes around that area and so it is entirely possible that some trapping is going on but it would be nice to know that this is being properly managed and with a minimum of suffering to the animals trapped.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Absolute mugs. That's what they take you for.  
    • Trossachs definitely have one! 
    • A A day-school for girls and a boarding school for boys (even with, by the late '90s, a tiny cadre of girls) are very different places.  Though there are some similarities. I think all schools, for instance, have similar "rules", much as they all nail up notices about "potential" and "achievement" and keeping to the left on the stairs. The private schools go a little further, banging on about "serving the public", as they have since they were set up (either to supply the colonies with District Commissioners, Brigadiers and Missionaries, or the provinces with railway engineers), so they've got the language and rituals down nicely. Which, i suppose, is what visitors and day-pupils expect, and are expected, to see. A boarding school, outside the cloistered hours of lesson-times, once the day-pupils and teaching staff have been sent packing, the gates and chapel safely locked and the brochures put away, becomes a much less ambassadorial place. That's largely because they're filled with several hundred bored, tired, self-supervised adolescents condemned to spend the night together in the flickering, dripping bowels of its ancient buildings, most of which were designed only to impress from the outside, the comfort of their occupants being secondary to the glory of whatever piratical benefactor had, in a last-ditch attempt to sway the judgement of their god, chucked a little of their ill-gotten at the alleged improvement of the better class of urchin. Those adolescents may, to the curious eyes of the outer world, seem privileged but, in that moment, they cannot access any outer world (at least pre-1996 or thereabouts). Their whole existence, for months at a time, takes place in uniformity behind those gates where money, should they have any to hand, cannot purchase better food or warmer clothing. In that peculiar world, there is no difference between the seventh son of a murderous sheikh, the darling child of a ball-bearing magnate, the umpteenth Viscount Smethwick, or the offspring of some hapless Foreign Office drone who's got themselves posted to Minsk. They are egalitarian, in that sense, but that's as far as it goes. In any place where rank and priviilege mean nothing, other measures will evolve, which is why even the best-intentioned of committees will, from time to time, spawn its cliques and launch heated disputes over archaic matters that, in any other context, would have long been forgotten. The same is true of the boarding school which, over the dismal centuries, has developed a certain culture all its own, with a language indended to pass all understanding and attitiudes and practices to match. This is unsurprising as every new intake will, being young and disoriented, eagerly mimic their seniors, and so also learn those words and attitudes and practices which, miserably or otherwise, will more accurately reflect the weight of history than the Guardian's style-guide and, to contemporary eyes and ears, seem outlandish, beastly and deplorably wicked. Which, of course, it all is. But however much we might regret it, and urge headteachers to get up on Sundays and preach about how we should all be tolerant, not kill anyone unnecessarily, and take pity on the oiks, it won't make the blindest bit of difference. William Golding may, according to psychologists, have overstated his case but I doubt that many 20th Century boarders would agree with them. Instead, they might look to Shakespeare, who cheerfully exploits differences of sex and race and belief and ability to arm his bullies, murderers, fraudsters and tyrants and remains celebrated to this day,  Admittedly, this is mostly opinion, borne only of my own regrettable experience and, because I had that experience and heard those words (though, being naive and small-townish, i didn't understand them till much later) and saw and suffered a heap of brutishness*, that might make my opinion both unfair and biased.  If so, then I can only say it's the least that those institutions deserve. Sure, the schools themselves don't willingly foster that culture, which is wholly contrary to everything in the brochures, but there's not much they can do about it without posting staff permanently in corridors and dormitories and washrooms, which would, I'd suggest, create a whole other set of problems, not least financial. So, like any other business, they take care of the money and keep aloof from the rest. That, to my mind, is the problem. They've turned something into a business that really shouldn't be a business. Education is one thing, raising a child is another, and limited-liability corporations, however charitable, tend not to make the best parents. And so, in retrospect, I'm inclined not to blame the students either (though, for years after, I eagerly read the my Old School magazine, my heart doing a little dance at every black-edged announcement of a yachting tragedy, avalanche or coup). They get chucked into this swamp where they have to learn to fend for themselves and so many, naturally, will behave like predators in an attempt to fit in. Not all, certainly. Some will keep their heads down and hope not to be noticed while others, if they have a particular talent, might find that it protects them. But that leaves more than enough to keep the toxic culture alive, and it is no surprise at all that when they emerge they appear damaged to the outside world. For that's exactly what they are. They might, and sometimes do, improve once returned to the normal stream of life if given time and support, and that's good. But the damage lasts, all the same, and isn't a reason to vote for them. * Not, if it helps to disappoint any lawyers, at Dulwich, though there's nothing in the allegations that I didn't instantly recognise, 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...