Jump to content

Recommended Posts

At the top of Nunhead cemetery there is a lookout point from which you can look through the maintained gap in the trees across London to Saint Pauls cathedral.

I noticed recently that in the foreground there is a “rogue“ building gradually being constructed and increasing in height, floor by floor.

If a few more floors are added the view of Saint Pauls will be deleted, or at least significantly reduced.

Does anybody know anything about it, I have no way of knowing where the building is or how far from Nunhead?

IIMG_2012.thumb.jpeg.e08597bf0a4a211469d012b6c059b2b4.jpeg’m not trying to start a campaign or anything (I wouldn’t know which building to address) but I wondered whether it had ever been a consideration to maintain the view, I imagine not as it may not have been obvious to developers or the council.

  • Sad 5

I thought it was a protected view, but this website shows otherwise:

London's Protected Views — Richard Gower

This site may be of interest:

Protected views and tall buildings - City of London

Very sad, I always plonk on the bench and admire the view on the few occasions I go to the cemetery.

 

  • Like 2

You're looking at the developments on Glengall Road.

I'm pretty sure it's the development with the contractors HG for Southern Housing

Unfortunately it's not a protected view so it wouldn't have been a consideration at the time of application to the council.

 

  • Thanks 1

According to Southwark Council consultation report from 2023 it is a protected view:-

"The view of St Pauls Cathedral from Nunhead Cemetery is a protected view within the Southwark Plan and this is acknowledged within the CMP. The CMP contains an ‘action plan’, which states that the view should continue to be maintained within the cemetery by cutting back tree growth. Some residents were concerned that this was not happening regularly enough to retain this view. Unfortunately, the regularity of maintenance is limited by our maintenance budget. Should visitors notice that the view has become obscured, it would be helpful if they could inform council staff."

  • Thanks 2

There's a set of what seem to be statutory directions pertaining to a set of specific protected  vistas, from points such as Greenwich, Primrose Hill, Kenwood, Richmond, at https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/gla_migrate_files_destination/LVMF Directions 16 March 2012.pdf, and I don't find Nunhead mentioned in it; though I don't know that it's the only set of such directions.  I do doubt that a "protected view within the Southwark Plan" is a creature of the same species.  Perhaps someone can find it.

Edited by ianr

Protected view includes the backdrop too. So if this spoiled the view of St Paul's from a protected view in the North (Primose Hill) etc this would be a problem.

This issue came up in the DHFV stadium application which itself has no view of St Paul's but might have impacted other protected views if the the housing tower blocks were too tall.

9 hours ago, ianr said:

There's a set of what seem to be statutory directions pertaining to a set of specific protected  vistas, from points such as Greenwich, Primrose Hill, Kenwood, Richmond, at https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/gla_migrate_files_destination/LVMF Directions 16 March 2012.pdf, and I don't find Nunhead mentioned in it; though I don't know that it's the only set of such directions.  I do doubt that a "protected view within the Southwark Plan" is a creature of the same species.  Perhaps someone can find it.

A quick google search found it. "New Southwark Plan - Borough Views" is what you want. Also, you could search something like "Southwark Council Protected Views" and it comes up.

Anyways, The council's taken this upon themselves to protect a few views of St Pauls from within the council's boundaries. It's not the same as the protected views that result in the designs of properties in the city like The Cheesegrater and The Scalpel.

The most important part is this: "Development that exceeds a Threshold Plane is likely to harm a viewer’s ability to recognise and appreciate St Paul’s Cathedral and is therefore likely to be refused."

It doesn't seem that the development in the photo harms both the viewer's ability to recognise and appreciate the cathedral therefore it was given permission. It does look like for it's gone right up to the line of what is acceptable and stayed there.

The Southern website says they've had the topping off ceremony on August 22nd for the 6th floor. Completion due 2025.

https://www.southernhousing.org.uk/latest-news/2023/milestone-at-our-southwark-development

Although the HG website has a picture of a building with 11 levels.

https://www.hgconstruction.co.uk/new-scheme-at-glengall-road/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I was in Forest Hill Road today, just past the Rye, and noticed there is a dentist next to the Herne (pub) that has NHS signs outside. I've never had any problems getting NHS dental treatment in East Dulwich, and I get regular check ups. I've been to three  different dental practices here over the years, all with NHS treatment. I think the difficulties are in other parts of the country. Malumbu has a good explanation above. I didn't hear the Radio 4 programme, but I'm guessing that a  radio programme is not going to have time to say where you CAN easily get NHS treatment, and is bound to focus on the negatives and the horror stories, otherwise it would be very boring! ETA: Re children's teeth, I think the major issue is not lack of dentists, it is children being given sugary food, drinks and confectionery which rots their teeth. The education of parents needs to be about this, not just about tooth brushing. And in some cases the poor diet may also be due to lack of money for healthy food. Though of course the lack of dentists doesn't help, if  the tooth rotting can't be rectified by fillings or extraction.
    • Well, I hope you like what you see, the hot air, lack of answers and continual blaming things on the last Government and the made up blackhole, I find are nauseating. The man needs to see reality, because I'd guess that if we had a snap election tomorrow and based on the first six months of this parliament, Labour would get trounced. When the election does finally happen and if that isn't before the people rise up and throw this lot out, Labour will not be voted back in for a millennium.  
    • Yes thanks that's exactly the choices I get.  I will block and if somehow they find a way back I'll report.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...