Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Anyone with half a brain knows that bringing up kids in your own little bubble is unhealthy both for them and society in general... regardless of political persuasion or what newspaper you may or may not read.


But is simply saying "I'm against ALL faith schools" sort of a PC way of wriggling out of the debate?

If you are in a little bubble you are hardly likely to perceive it as such and therefore couldn't possibly think it unhealthy.


I was taught in faith schools when growing up. It didn't stop me from thinking for myself in my teens and deciding I wasn't going to mass anymore, much to the horror of my mother.


My son was never christened but I bet there are plenty of non believers here who have had their little Jonny baptised, as you do. Hands up anyone?

There is still in place a requirement for prayer in state schools, presumably remaining from a time when the C of E featured predominantly in most British people's lives. In practice it seems most "secular" school ignore this, but technically my understanding is that it would be enforceable and schools could be penalised for not providing prayer time. So it seems that until we truly secularise all state schools, the argument against (any) religion in school is going to remain cloudy in practice.

I believe all primary schools should continue to do religious studies so that children learn to respect the various religions of their peers, but actual religious teachings / practises should have no place in school.


My daughter is starting a CofE school in September, and it worries me a bit.

A civilisation is measured not by the rights it grants its majority but the privileges it allows its minorities. Muslim families are as entitled as any other religious group to schools that nurture their children's faith. Muslim pupils should be educated in Muslim schools because the current system is marginalising them. Teaching Muslim children in a Muslim school would remove the "problem of them being exposed" to values that conflict with Islamic faith. Muslim pupils are disadvantaged and marginalised in the city's state schools because the cultural heritage of the curriculum is "European and Christian".


Muslim schools provide an education in accordance with the Muslim beliefs and values, such as providing single-sex schooling after puberty. They are thus a response to the danger of absorption into the dominant culture.


The number of Muslim children is on the increase in Bradford state and church schools. There are lot of schools where Muslim children are in majority. In my opinion, all such schools may be opted out as Muslim Academies for proper education. British history from early periods to present day should be taught in all schools. Islamic history from the early period to present day should be part and parcel of the National Curriculum. I think to be fair the Arabic and Persian contributions to the world in medicine, mathematics and other sciences plus their involvement in world affairs should be taught.


The demand for state funded Muslim schools is in accordance with the law of the land. Muslims are not asking for any favour. I set up the first Muslim school in London in 1981 and now there are 188 Muslim schools and only 12 are state funded. I would like to see each and every Muslim child in a state funded Muslim schools and I hope one day my dream would come true. There is no place for a non-Muslim child or a teacher in a Muslim school. Bilingual Muslim children need bilingual Muslim teachers as role models during their developmental period. There are few schools for Hindu and Sikh communities. Now even Black community is thinking of setting up their own state funded schools for their own children with black teachers.


You better teach your children in your own schools and let migrant communities teach their children according to their needs and demands.British Establishment and society should concentrate on the evils of their own society and stop trying to change the way of life of Muslims. Muslim community does not want to integrate with the British society, indulging in incivility, anti-social behaviour, drug and knife culture, binge drinking, teenage pregnancies and abortion.


A Muslim is a citizen of this tiny global village. He/she does not want to become notoriously monolingual Brit. He/she is well versed in standard English, Arabic, Urdu and other community languages so that they do not find themselves cut off from their cultural heritage and are able to enjoy the beauty of their literature and poetry.

IA

What's the difference between a dead Muslim and a dead Christian? Nothing. So if you define your life along the lines of what differences there are between people or religions as opposed to what you have in common, you are suffering from a form of self entrapment. It's a form of blindness.

Iftikhar Ahmed,


First thing, do you have any children? If the miracle has occurred and you do so, how many of them have you sent to a Muslim School?

Secondly, under what authority you have appointed yourself the spokesperson of Muslims in Dulwich/London?


If you want Muslim Schools there are plenty in Saudi Arabia, Bangladesh,India, Somalia, Pakistan and Afghanistan. As a British Muslim living happily in Dulwich, having gone to a C of E School myself, I'm finding it extremely difficult to understand what you're trying to prove. I did not lose any of my Islamic beliefs and I was not cut off of my cultural heritage and I am bilingual! I can tell you that many of my friends and I in similar positions have gained a lot by attending the government schools in this country. With your views I can only feel pity for your children.

Please be brave enough to answer the question I mentioned first.

In Dulwich we have people of all religious beliefs and those without living peacefully and the last thing we need is a person of your kind trying to cause havoc in the minds of people in the name of Islam. Having read your post many times over I can only come to one conclusion that is I SMELL A RAT.

We do not need another self appointed hypocrite as a 'spokesperson' for Muslims in Dulwich.


Look forward to hearing from you Brother.

Come on everyone leave Ifti alone, is there any amongst us who haven't got pissed-up and made a post filled with streams of ludicrous, high-falutin' garbage dressed up as a 'serious' starting off point for debate?

You know, got all in a lager and Jack D fuelled mood that after much brooding gave you the confidence, that well, you could be a contrarian. Mild-mannered as you are.

You change from Christopher Robin to Christopher Hitchens


And then in the hot, aching, shuddering grip of a hangover, you read your post and the responses to it.

Shame, guilt, nausea etc overwhelm.


But, probably still under the influence you decide to grit your teeth and continue to defend your indefensible position.


Seen it on here with restaurants, songs, pubs, pizzas and more, so let's let Ifti off the hook and just discreetly let this thread drop and ignore any attempts by him to revive it.

The debate rages on Jeremy- 'faith' schools promote 'faith' in a supernatural 'being' (which is a massive copout in itself since there is and never will be any empirical evidence for said being) and all the hype and discrimination that goes with it. And- unfortunately Alan Medic- some faiths discourage thinking for oneself i.e. they require 'blind faith'

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But, AC maybe they was as royally slaughtered on

> Stella and gin, when they started up with one

> another as Ifti was on Kronenbourg and Jack.

> It's an explanation, of sorts I guess.

>

> But heck, them boys do like to quarrel. That's for

> sure.


Arhhhh

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • If you're a fundraising intermediary, reporting promptly and accurately on how you've raised and spent funds seems quite important.
    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...