Jump to content

water con man


Recommended Posts

A man just came to my door saying he was from Thames Water and that he believes we have a leak. I was immediately suspicious and did not let him in. He asked me to turn off the water at the stop cock until the cold water stopped running, which I did and he remained in the street looking into our water meter. He then said that meter was still running so we must have a leak and grinned at me. I did not believe him and said I was going to call Thames Water and check with them. Thames Water knew of no such man so I went to the door to send him away just as he put through a Thames Water card which says " We think you have a leak" with a reference number and information about how the pipe from the road to the house is the customer's responsibility and that failing to respond could result in them using legal powers... It said he was a contractor from PN Daly and Thames Water do use PN Daly. However his van was completely un branded and the reference code he has given me means nothing to Thames Water. Whilst outside my house he received a call from a lady in Crystal Palace Road who was also asking him why he needs access to her kitchen.

So - I believe he is a conman. Think twice before believing him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I called Thames over a very similar incident.


Unfortunately, it turned out that we did have a leak. A tiny leak. And that tiny leak cost us ?500.



Have a look on the pavement outside your house for any signs of paint sprayed.. Usually an arrow pointing to you or to the street. If e arrow points to you it's bad news.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think any further feedback will be very welcome. At the moment I can't tell whether it's a case of a genuine contractor and inadequate information systems, or a pretty sophisticated con, from someone with probable inside knowledge.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He has painted a blue arrow pointing towards the house. I have since called Thames Water billing and asked if they thought our water bill was high and she said that we seemed to be using very little water given that there are two of us in the house. Also, I dug the front garden last Saturday and the ground there was bone dry. I am still struggling to believe that this man was genuine.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thames are always sending 'unidentified' people and companies to do stuff. The blokes with the listening rods creep round (usually at night, when it's quiet) hanging around drains with thei ear trumpets like some sort of deluded drain-spotters.


They employ private companies who knock on your door on spec and ask to 'have a look' down yer sewer with no warning or formal communication from Thames.


Every looks really dodgy when there's no need for it to be so..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The blue arrow of doom!


Sorry to say Cosmos that it would appear they've identified a supply pipe leak, and the leak is thought to be on your side (so your responsibility) rather than Thames.


It's pointless looking for signs of obvious dampness.. The 'leak' can be minuscule and still classed as a leak. Even a drip, somewhere along the pipe, is still a leak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have just called them and, yes, this is how Thames Water operate. They are sending another man to investigate the leak. Sorry everyone for the false alarm. I did however tell them that this "cold calling" approach is disconcerting.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They listen for the sound of running water - they go round at night, often, not just because it's a quieter time (to hear the water) but because you are much less likely to have a tap running at night. For those without meters (most of us, at the moment) there would be no way of examining water consumption anyway.


Supply pipes in ED are pretty old, and road humps (and things bumping over them) can put stress on the pipes, particularly at joints. In 25 years I have had 2 supply pipe leaks - the first paid for by Thames as part of a deal, the second covered by supply pipe insurance - but Thames also paid an element of the cost. The second was in the joint from my supply side into the pavement stop cock - the first a pin-hole puncture in the (lead) pipe as it entered the house through the foundations. The second leak was a moot point as to responsibility - it was at the tenement/ pavement junction - not clear whether it was on my land or the public way. Neither leak gave any surface indication (and yes, I did see them,and they were certainly there as leaks, just not surface evident - which isn't surprising as pipes can be 4-6 ft down).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cosmos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> He has painted a blue arrow pointing towards the

> house.

x x x x x x x x x x x x x

Ooer. You'd better call the rozzers back and tell them to stop thinking about taking a bus from camberwell to east dulwich next week in order to prevent and detect crime. Or maybe they won't bother anyway. However, what if the crims are getting smart and now carry blue spray paint for arrows as a ruse . . . ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Unfortunately, it turned out that we did have a

> leak. A tiny leak. And that tiny leak cost us

> ?500.

>

>


xxxxxxx


OMG is this why Thames Water are constantly sending me stuff about insurance, which I constantly bin (sorry, recycle)?


Maybe I'll read it next time :))

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Yes I saw how they were proudly showing that they had built 70 odd affordable houses in the first batch. I really do hope they stick to their commitment but history tells us this is not what happens - that developers will often build the first batch fulfilling their affordable housing (to buy or rent) commitment but then u-turn.   If I was a betting person I would wager that once completed the affordable housing is nowhere near 35%. Look at the Dulwich Square development - none of that ended up being affordable housing despite what the original application and plans said. If councils do take cash in lieu of social housing you can see why developers may see that as an easy way to pay their way out - they probably cover that cost 10 times over in the margins on the luxury properties they build instead.
    • I imagine it's going to look and feel pretty similar to the mixed use development about 300m to the north, but bigger.  https://maps.app.goo.gl/84WNyXLpvHmiLuHA7?g_st=ac
    • Purse found on upland road I have cancelled the bank cards
    • SE22 Franklin's was a disused pub/offe and was converted to SE 22 by a lovely Greek man and his family he did most of the work himself really great atmosphere and food.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...