Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hithere


Hoping for any advice from anyone that has had an extension built.


We are looking at building a second storey over an existing single storey extension. We would need to extend our mortgage in order to do this and get need planning permission. I believe we would also need our builders to do a test dig to check that the foundations of the existing extension could support a second storey.


We're not really sure what of what order to do things in, we are thinking that trying to arrange finance first might be the best thing to do, however, I was hoping for advice for anyone that might have done something similar to their house?


Thanks in advance

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/33537-building-an-extension/
Share on other sites

I'm doing something similar. The first thing is to get plans drawn up and apply for planning. It's not necesary to engage structural engineering costs before obtaining planning permission. Once you have planning permission, then I'd engage a structural engineer to do building regs / contruction drawings that you can use to tender the work. Building regs approval takes 6 weeks during which time you can arrange finance.


However, even before you go for planning, most builders will give you a rough indication over the phone of how much a job like this should cost (it will be very ballpark and wide ranging) so you can see if you can afford it before you go down this path. First storey extensions can be difficult to obtain planning for so I would definitely do that before enganging any other costs.


Good luck!

Surely the first thing to do is find out how much money your lender will forward, it's not like banks are throwing money around these days. What's the point of wasting money on getting plans done etc if they are only going to lend enough money to do half the extension?

Once you've found out how much money they will lend you, get a few builders around to give you a rough estimate. If this falls within the amount the bank will lend you, then the next thing to do is get the existing foundations looked at by an engineer. If they are not sufficient to support an additional storey, it will mean the existing foundations/extension will have to be underpinned and reinforced, adding thousands to the costs the builders estimated. The cost of a trial pit or two, and an engineer for an hour would be money well spent, and will cost you a lot less than paying for planning drawings/application, which as I said earlier, will be of no use to you if you can't afford to do the works...

Yes, finding out if you can afford it includes getting an indication of your finance options as well as a rough estimate of costs in my view. However, I wouldn't actually refinance / take-out a loan before getting planning permission as its not guaranteed. Also, planning permission is valuable in and of itself. It lasts for a couple of years so you have time to save up if necessary and if you sell before doing the works, you can pass the planning permission to the next buyer. Most first floor extensions are refused which is the only reason why I'd be cautious about engaging too many costs related to the project before knowing whether you can legally do the work.

What's the new extension going to provide. Another bedroom or a bathroom, or a reconfiguration of both. Max amount of money you could raise is the one to figure first. Then figure out what's needed construction wise.


So if you can borrow ?50 k, then you'll not want quotes coming in more than ?30k. However, you WILL end up spending nearer to ?50k on your ?30k extension because NO MATTER WHAT, there'll be hidden and extra costs. All builders are deluded optimists as are customers, trouble is only one pays the bills & that's you.


And when you hear "I know you think i'm mad and i've heard all the advice, but I really do want the real limestone in the bathroom darling" then run for the hills.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...