Jump to content

East Coast Langham Oak Cotbed, £75 (open to offers)


Recommended Posts

Beautiful solid oak Langham Cotbed from East Coast Nursery for sale, £75, open to offers. Suitable from birth with three mattress heights, removable sides + converts to toddler bed. John Lewis spring cotbed mattress included. Excellent condition. Very minor cosmetic damage, but pretty much unnoticeable on the varied oak surface. 

Note, on the current photos, we kept the second side up. It is possible to remove both sides, and to to make the head and foot sides lower in height (the bottom parts comes off - see the original picture for the different options that the cotbed converts to)

Features: 

  • Crafted from solid oak
  • Classic style
  • 3 Mattress base heights
  • Fixed sides
  • Easy to convert to a toddler bed when needed

Details:

  • Age: Suitable from birth
  • Colour: Antique
  • Finish: Oak 
  • Mattress Included: Yes
  • Mattress Size: 140 x 70 cm
  • Mattress type: Spring Mattress (John Lewis)

Dimensions: 
Cot: W77 x D146 x H98 cm / W30.3 x D57.4 x H38.5 Inch
Cot Bed: W77 x D146 x H61 cm / W30.3 x D57.4 x H24 Inch

I cannot find this version being sold anymore as it's an old model, but more pictures can be found here: https://furniture123.co.uk/east-coast-langham-oak-cot-bed-2988

Collection only from Forest Hill. 

Screenshot 2023-10-10 at 10.19.23.jpeg

IMG_8780 Medium.jpeg

IMG_8779 Medium.jpeg

IMG_9123 Medium.jpeg

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi if anyone has one pm me cheers 
    • You can always check when they registered on the forum, if you are suspicious. But I recommended Aria, and it certainly wasn't my only post on here, and it was a genuine recommendation. ETA: And he didn't ask me to make it, to the best of my recollection. But even if he had, many local tradespeople ask people to post on here if they are happy with the work that has been done.
    • I am not a patient at this practice, but surely it is more sensible to have an initial  phone discussion, as often the GP wouldn't need to see someone face to face unless they actually needed to physically examine them? This then leaves the available face to face appointments for patients who need them. And if during  the phone call the GP felt you needed examining, then arrangements could be made for a face to face. If you feel your ailment is such that you will definitely need to be physically examined, can you not explain that to the receptionist?
    • Give Labour a chance, they've only been in government for a short time, and they inherited a mess! As regards the notice boards, to the best of my recollection they were originally intended as community notice boards, and certainly not for advertising local businesses (who would decide which businesses  should have the limited space on the boards, anyway?) East Dulwich may have become more gentrified since the boards were first introduced, but that surely doesn't mean they should now be completely  taken over for the benefit of  the "middle classes", to the exclusion of everybody else? As  NewWave says, surely these people have other ways to find out about groups and events of interest to them, which the "non middle classes" may not have access to, and even if they did may not be able to afford them. Several people including myself have complained to councillors about the state of the noticeboards in the past.  I think one of the issues is that they were originally maintained by local volunteers, who may have either moved out of the area or lost interest - or given up in despair when the boards were flypostered and/or vandalised. I completely  agree that the boards should be used for information about not for profit organisations in the area, but if regular maintenance can't be provided and/or they continue to be vandalised, then I think it would be better if they were removed altogether.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...