Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Wrong. I have posted before about this lousy bus service, 'serving' (LOL) East Dulwich. Overheard last night: Between a driver waiting to start his shift on a 185, and numerous passengers waiting . . . waiting for the 484.


Passengers point out to the driver that the Countdown time for the 484 has read 'DUE' for 20 minutes. And that this happens day after day.


It's very simple, says the driver. The bus company misinforms the Countdown system. So there you have it - for a 4-late-4 you can't even trust the electronic wait time.


The company in question is Abellio, who are Dutch. And you can bet your last guilder they wouldn't DARE mess Dutch travellers round this way back home. But here in London, dozy lazy complacent complicit TfL points one of its 2 blind eyes and waves the situation through. Wake up TfL suits! Put your pension plans down for just one minute and do the regulatory job you've been tasked to do.


Blimey o'reilly


Lee Scoresby

Not ranting Alex K, and I don't need your condescension. Or does dissent bother you, Alex K?


It's anger at a lousy public service. I have said on the EDF before, the more people put up with stuff, the more we'll get dumped on.


This is a FORUM, read the label. In a democracy, people talk together and share knowledge.


Now in fact, mechanisms of accountability and change are extremely imperfect in Britain, not least in local government. If there were an effective 'other venue' I would use it. But I can talk to other SE Londoners about the situation.


ianr, it was Camberwell, coming toward East Dulwich.

It only ever happens at the first stops, eg. Camberwell Green & Kings.


I've always got the impression that the buses are due to leave the bus station at Camberwell at a certain time, which gets posted on the countdown board as say 2mins at the first stop, 4 mins at Kings.


Then for some reason, the bus doesn't actually leave the depot when it's supposed to.


Hence, 2 mins becomes 5 etc.


It doesn't usually happen further along the route, once it is known what time the bus has actually started it's run.


This has been going on for ages, so the problem obviously lies with either Camberwell bus depot and/or Abellio & the info they are sending out.

Happy to cut Countdown itself a bit of slack - it's ballpark - often the bus comes SOONER than advised - (unlike "adjusting the service", hoho, which just means hangin' about in a stopped bus) - but 'DUE' for 20 minutes? - it destroys trust in the system


It may be 'start of route' - here's something that happens further down the line - just happened to me 90 minutes before writing this - not exactly rush hour: the 484 was chock-a-block, and people waiting at an ED stop were left standing.


My point: this is a chronically badly run route, and TfL has failed over years to stand up for passengers. And as I pointed out to Alex K, there is no obvious way for us to hold the nameless-faceless ones to account and insist on a properly serviced bus route.


Lee Scoresby

Lee was a BIT ranty, but that doesn't mean he is wrong


Some bus routes simply are better run than others. 484 is poor and the 37 oscillates between ok and poor


The bus countdowns for 40/176/185 are near enough reliable


bus countdowns on 37 route, no matter where you are, can be a complete work of fiction. Yesterday at Herne Hill it said 15 mins, then 13, then back to 18, then stayed at 20 mins for a while before eventually counting down to 0 and a bus turned up


On other days it can say 8 minutes, only for a bus to arrive in 2 minutes


This just doesn't happen on other routes and there must be an underlying reason - some routes rely on manual updates maybe?


Anyway - 484. Rubbish. All single decker services in London = rubbish

**condescension**?


I addressed you as an equal; no thought of "descending" to a level below mine. If I've triggered a deep-seated flare of self-perceived inadequacy, I do apologise. I have no idea when a poster's psyche harbours an explosive device of that sort, much less when its fuse is live, and certainly I did not mean to set off in you such a flare.


If a complaint is made in a forum none of whose readers can act to resolve the complaint... the falling tree, the forest, no one to hear it, is the tree's noisy complaint acted on? I sympathise with the *non*ranter, then, in his *non*rant, but am at a loss as to what to do beyond extending condolences. TopTree, above, has made a practical suggestion. Let me endorse it: Complain to BoJo.


And **Does dissent bother you...**?


Why should it? I can't follow that train of associations at all.

It might be worth putting in a complaint to tfl - they have a team dealing with bus complaints, the contact is here:


https://custserv.tfl.gov.uk/icss_csip/ZCreateRequestChangeAboutValue.do?newTab=CA_12162


A friend used to work on this team, they seemed to try hard to sort complaints out

Well Alex K, now we've taken a bite out of each other, shall we leave it? I have no interest whatever in troll-on-troll action.


'Authoritarian personalities' occasionally come on the EDF for whom dissent (speaking about problems) is offensive and threatening. So I'm glad that isn't you.


Thanks for all the suggestions about what to do. I really do not want to seem cynical about any of them. In past years I have engaged with a variety of complaint procedures, not just about transport. Every one of them was just a garbage chute. It was impossible even to get the system to refer to (never mind admit) the issue at hand. Nothing whatever was ever achieved. Transport user groups, in the past at least, have been famously, hilariously unwilling to upset the transport companies they were supposely holding to account.


In this present context, my point to people is really to notice how scattered and temporary and uncertain these suggested remedies are. Feedback (a better idea than 'complaint') should be such an inherent intuitive evident continuous part of any modern urban public system that this sort of forum thread would be superfluous.


Lee Scoresby

The 484 service has been badly hit in the last few weeks by long-running roadworks in Ladywell that mean there's a weird diversion in operation in Brockley on both directions. I find it's a reasonable service most of the time, but a very busy one. It's a lot better than the train service.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • wanted lego my child is collecting lego if you have any for sale please let me know
    • I'd actually go the whole hog and do a fondue, we all remember them fondly from parties in the last century or trips to Switzerland.  As long as it is cheese, not chocolate, urghhh
    • Gosh, that all sounds so familiar!  Southwark are constantly holding up their Outdoor Events Policy as proof of process, but then constantly allow exceptions when things aren't quite done correctly. Point in case, Gala's licence application - extract from the Consultation Findings Report - "The GALA team formally submitted their application to hold GALA 2025 to the council on the 7 October 2024. It is usually a requirement that applications for larger scale events are submitted with a minimum of 9 months to process them, but discretion can be applied if there are mitigating circumstances. 8.4 of the Outdoor Events Policy clarifies that processing applications received outside the stated lead-in times is at the Council's discretion. In this case: • The council were aware that Assembled Gala were preparing an application for the event to take place in 2025 in advance of their submission date, with operational discussions already taking place • GALA festival has been taking place in Peckham Rye Park since 2018 – less time is needed regarding event planning than if it were a new event • The GALA team already have a Premises Licence in place for this event (this is a pre- requisite for the Event Licence to be issued), so no time needed to be factored in for a premises licence application and decision-making process" So despite the fact that there would need to be major planning decisions due to the change of site access, they didn't think Gala needed to adhere to the same rules as everyone else? Makes me wonder what other rules they are exempted from... On a similar note, has anyone received a Resident Communication letter, containing the contact details for issues? We haven't, and we live directly opposite the site on Colyton Rd. They were supposedly distributed on 29/4...
    • We find that just adding your own favourites is the best way - everyone likes different things and your guests will likely be happy enough
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...