Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Reeko, apology accepted. I'm glad you take an equal opportunities approach to class based stereotypes, and thank you for pointing out other allegedly grating minor celebrity voices. I for one find a certain national weather presenter rather annoying, he's just very monotone, by the by of course.


Does your co-workers boss has his teeth professionally bleached or does he use those tip-ex style paint jobbies from boots? He may well be 'Technical Middle Class' in which case complaining may not help. Studies have shown that those falling into said category tend to have the disposable income to engage in self-gratifying pastimes, but they lack in 'cultural capital' and so may not take too kindly to any complaints you may have, especially accent based ones. Just thought I'd better let you know. Good luck anyway.


Louisa.

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> (The only reason the working class London accent

> ie cockney accent, is irritating is because it has

> been sanitised out of TV except for screeching and

> hysterics in East Enders and gangster thug types

> in Danny Dyer and Vinny Jones films. Everyone has

> been conditioned to think BBC English=good,

> regional accents= dubious characters (when in fact

> the opposite is probably true)


No 'everyone' hasn't. There's no one more everyone than me and I reckon Dannys Baker & Kelly, Sean Lock, Alison Moyet, Jason Statham (when he's not an American), June Brown (more as herself, but but I'll 'low Dot Cotton), Jonathon + Paul Ross, Ray & Jaime Winston, Michael Caine (think Harry Brown), Robert Elms, Suggs and Eliza Doolittle have the most Londonly, smart and if you want 'cool' speaking voices.



Also, cause they make some effort, Evan Davis and John Humphries who frequently employ the word 'gonna' and inform the listener that we/she/he should "get" some weather/sport, oh, that transatlantic crossover, pure NYLON so it is.


And if Sarah Anne Loiuse Montague could be persuaded to chuff a Disque Bleu or two a day and take a little tuition from Jessie Wallace, then I would have no objection.


I'd also probably never leave the house before nine in the morning,

Oh no Louisa


he is clearly common and proud. He is from Liverpool (need I say more), indulges in fake tannery and wears too much after shave. I am not familiar with the different ways to achieve tipex white teeth, but no doubt his method is the most vulgar.


I fear our chat will not go smoothly. Can't think why.

Yes common and proud, but equally has a decent job and can afford to indulge himself. It's a bit of a catch twenty two really. Despite the comfortable economics of his situation, he clearly has a hard to shift scouse accent judging by your description. This is an awkward situation. I genuinely believed we only had three classes, but according to recent studies we now have seven. I even had to tweak my own class test just so I could get the answer I wanted. This is all getting slightly confusing but, my point is, if he is from a 'Technical Middle Class' background he is basically a working class northerner who has landed on his feet with a decent job. He will therefore not understand or take kindly to accent based mocking or be somewhat sympathetic to the Pauline Fowler wannabe in your office, in which case you may need to alter your argument about her uncanny resemblance to said fictional working class hero.


Louisa.

A closet working class northern boy shrouded in southern wealth. A complicated chipped shoulder, one which isn't easy to shift. I somehow suspect you have more than a hint of envy at his position of power, one which could make or break the Pauline Fowler wannabe with the annoying voice. So close but not cigar reeko. It must be frustrating.


Louisa.

Of course Pauline Fowler's voice is nothing to do with accent, the east London often sounding cool and can sound damn sexy. It's all about the tone, which is ear piercing and stuck on the aforementioned volume 11.


She was a damn fine filly in her time mind!!

Sorry to disappoint Lou, I think I trump him, as I am 'professional' staff (have letters after my name and everything), and he is mere 'support' staff - should I so choose I could crush them both like bugs.




(BTW I HATE this terminology, was introduced to it by my ex boss who was civil service)

I bought pneumatic drill ear protectors at one office I worked at and just started wearing them while I was trying to concentrate on my work.


http://ts1.mm.bing.net/th?id=H.4700554989406352&pid=15.1


Strangely, the very loud annoying person sharing our office stopped being quite so loud and annoying, even when I wasn't wearing the ear protectors, lol.

Any approach such as trying to equal the volume levels of 'Pauline' or telling her to put a sock in it will create tension, so fun to do but ultimately not useful.


- Lady D's suggestion is a good one, but has a ?'s outlay if you want the serious ear defenders.

- Speaking with 'Pauline' may work if done in private, but I'd do it from a 'I need to concentrate' / 'My work is suffering' angle, rather than just 'Ooh you're too noisy'. Give 'Pauline' a rationale / impact to obtain most reasonable outcome.

- Speaking to her manager with same approach is the other option, being clear that you need to escalate asap because you're having to finish work in the evenings to catch-up, but thought you'd check if the manager could do anything to support your concerns before you do escalate.


I had this recently while hot-desking at a company, there were a few staff who'd travelled-down from a regional office for the day and were sat on the other 3 (of 4) desks. It was CommunityCentresVille, Tennessee, non-stop chitty-chat about holidays, weather, comparative diets and TV drama. I was trying to concentrate, these guys (2 guys, 1 girl) were taking the mick IMO.

So, I held my work phone to my ear and joined a fake audio conference. I said "excuse me, can you repeat that" a couple of times to my imaginary audio colleagues, when that did not work I said "I'm sorry there's a LOT of background noise here today", then I kept saying "pardon? , pardon ?, can you repeat that last bit" whilst sticking a finger in my other ear and holding a wincing trying-to-concentrate-on-the-audio expression. I did all this speaking EXTREMELY loudly, the chatters could definitely hear me no matter how much they'd have liked to pretened otherwise.

After 2 mins (I know) one of the chatters elbowed another and nodded towards a break-out area all of 40 feet away and they went there to finish their must-have conversation. "Ah, that's better the background noise seems to have calmed-down, FOR NOW".

When they cam back I was off the 'audio' and they were quiet, only making the odd work-related comment.


Let us know how you fix this.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I spoke at the council meeting last night to object. 400 people objected to the development. I, and I suspect everyone else, is not against development, BUT the size of this too BIG to accept. The council is held hostage by the developer who is promising 53 affordable homes. And in return they get to build 360 bedrooms for students. The original plan was all student accommodation. 8 stories is completely out of sync. It’s sets a precedent for future development. They have been taking to the council since 2022.  What did not help our cause whatsoever was Counsellors McAsh and Mwangangye speaking as ward counsellors at the meeting. As the Chair of the committee said, it’s not often ward counsellors attend such meetings. The counsellors will say they didn’t speak for or against the development. However, they did speak up for the benefits of the site bringing more affordable housing to the borough. They asked for a window to have frosted glass to protect privacy. They asked for residents to be consulted during the building phase. So let’s be really clear, they did not say anything about the “optimisation” of the site. They did not ask for the site to be scaled down. Now I know why James would not be drawn into discussing the development before now….   Make no mistake, this development is optimised for profit and the trade off is the developer profits at scale and the council have 53 affordable homes. The Southwark Plan says they should respect the character of East Dulwich. How can an 8 story building be ever respectful to the character of East Dulwich. It’s a hugely imposing building.  Unless we stand up together as a community, then we shall be stuck with it, although I suspect we won’t be stuck with our Labour counsellors for much longer… Feeling let down and disappointed this morning.   
    • Another glowing review for Niko the plumber. I found his details on the forum after we had a water leak. He was able to come round same day and fixed our problem. He was very reasonable and did a great job.    His number is 07818 607583.   Matt 
    • Putin's little helpers (like theTelegraph) TRUMPeting (sorry not sorry) the fact that UK only gets 10% tariff from uSA as a Brexit Dividend and validating Starmer's qauiescence  Which ignores so much The tariff was calculated on a childish  deficit/exports calculation and ignored any discussion 25% on cars remains in place for UK as well The difference between 10% UK vs 20% EU is a fraction of the cost of Brexit anyway (that cost was dismissed as "worth it" or hand waved away - whereas this relatively small "Win" is heralded as a major victory plus in any case even if UK was on 0%, teh global fallout from this will massively impact UK as a standalone country anyway   Of course not many countries escaped with 0% - oh but Russia did (although that is likely because they are already sanctioned)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...