Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I just wanted to check if any of you in the area are experiencing similar things.

A few months ago the fraud dept of my partner's banks asked that he get in touch. he replied (via the correct number) and was told someone had called them claiming to be him and requested a new credit card. He hadn't made this call. The bank cancelled everything and said they would send another. After a few days he checked online to find that a new card had been sent and had been already been used. He phoned the bank again and it was cancelled. The second new card arrived safely.

This week we both received 2 letters from Vanquis bank (a bank we have never used) The first was a PIN number the second a letter requesting that we send ID in the post to them. The letters were real and matched the banks numbers on the website. We called them and it turns out someone had indeed tried to open  accounts in our names. Needless to say the bank cancelled this and are investigating -it has been reported to the police. 

There is always one of us at home and no one else lives here, so therefore no access to our house to get letters. We think this means that the cards may have been intercepted prior to reaching us.

Has anyone else had this?

Thanks

along with Scammers some bank employs and some post office workers are also involved in this it has been on the TV a few times...it looks like the Arm of the Law is getting shorter and shorter  ...and the arms of the Crooks is getting Longer longer . 

It's frightening, everything is now done online and easy but there's a tradeoff between security and convenience. The easier it is to prove your identity, the easier it is for scammers to do the same thing should they get hold of your information.

Common ways they get your information is through email phishing attacks or it could be a person on the phone pretending to be from your bank, or data breach. DON'T click anything in emails unless you're expecting it and are 100% sure, instead go to the secure website starting with https and navigate to your issue from there.

No one is really immune from an attack though, we're all susceptible if caught off guard, like if a fake email arrives that just happens to coincide with something you're involved in.

  • Thanks 1
  On 15/09/2023 at 10:17, Marmattee said:

I just wanted to check if any of you in the area are experiencing similar things.

A few months ago the fraud dept of my partner's banks asked that he get in touch. he replied (via the correct number) and was told someone had called them claiming to be him and requested a new credit card. He hadn't made this call. The bank cancelled everything and said they would send another. After a few days he checked online to find that a new card had been sent and had been already been used. He phoned the bank again and it was cancelled. The second new card arrived safely.

This week we both received 2 letters from Vanquis bank (a bank we have never used) The first was a PIN number the second a letter requesting that we send ID in the post to them. The letters were real and matched the banks numbers on the website. We called them and it turns out someone had indeed tried to open  accounts in our names. Needless to say the bank cancelled this and are investigating -it has been reported to the police. 

There is always one of us at home and no one else lives here, so therefore no access to our house to get letters. We think this means that the cards may have been intercepted prior to reaching us.

Has anyone else had this?

Thanksi 

Expand  

I don't understand the first part of this.

If your partner hadn't made the original phone call requesting a credit card, a) how did the caller get through security and b) why was another card sent out if your partner hadn't requested one in the first place?

Have I misunderstood?

  On 15/09/2023 at 17:18, Sue said:

I don't understand the first part of this.

If your partner hadn't made the original phone call requesting a credit card, a) how did the caller get through security and b) why was another card sent out if your partner hadn't requested one in the first place?

Have I misunderstood?

Expand  

Because scammers can get through basic security checks if they have your details somehow and pretend to be you.

Edited by Twoddle
  On 15/09/2023 at 17:21, Twoddle said:

Because scammers can get through basic security checks if they have your details somehow and pretend to be you

Expand  

But then the bank sent out another card although they had been told that the first one hadn't been requested?

 

 

I got hacked at Xmas.  It may have started with the theft in the post of a new card, but they probably got into my emails as well.  Most ID crime is on line.  Change all your passwords, set up dual whatsitsface authentication, contact all your financial institutions, register on a credit rating agency, and report to the frauduline site.  Will post link later.  It's horrible and very intrusive.  My mobile number was also stolen which alerted me to the likelihood that my banks were being approached.  Calling them up to be told that I had already phoned them that day was surreal. Some financial institutions were better than others.  Good news was that I wDnit out of pocket - a few £k was taken.

Also makes you paranoid that someone is watching you at home.  

I found that it is relatively easy for them to transfer your number and crack your credit rating.

  • Sad 1
  On 15/09/2023 at 21:05, malumbu said:

I got hacked at Xmas.  It may have started with the theft in the post of a new card, but they probably got into my emails as well.  Most ID crime is on line.  Change all your passwords, set up dual whatsitsface authentication, contact all your financial institutions, register on a credit rating agency, and report to the frauduline site.  Will post link later.  It's horrible and very intrusive.  My mobile number was also stolen which alerted me to the likelihood that my banks were being approached.  Calling them up to be told that I had already phoned them that day was surreal. Some financial institutions were better than others.  Good news was that I wDnit out of pocket - a few £k was taken.

Also makes you paranoid that someone is watching you at home.  

I found that it is relatively easy for them to transfer your number and crack your credit rating.

Expand  

😮😮😮

  On 15/09/2023 at 17:18, Sue said:

I don't understand the first part of this.

If your partner hadn't made the original phone call requesting a credit card, a) how did the caller get through security and b) why was another card sent out if your partner hadn't requested one in the first place?

Have I misunderstood?

Expand  

Hi Sue

I think I haven't been clear

a) the caller didn't get through security - the fraudsters made the request over the phone and the bank became suspicious. They therefore called my partner directly. I don't know what made them suspicious but I guess it was either a lack of security info or incorrect info

b) To be safe the bank cancelled his card and sent him another. As this new card never arrived and was then later used, we reckon this was intercepted - perhaps the fraudsters knew all along a new card was going to be sent??

  On 16/09/2023 at 07:15, Marmattee said:

Hi Sue

I think I haven't been clear

a) the caller didn't get through security - the fraudsters made the request over the phone and the bank became suspicious. They therefore called my partner directly. I don't know what made them suspicious but I guess it was either a lack of security info or incorrect info

b) To be safe the bank cancelled his card and sent him another. As this new card never arrived and was then later used, we reckon this was intercepted - perhaps the fraudsters knew all along a new card was going to be sent??

Expand  

Ah. So it wasn't a completely new card, it was a replacement card for one he already had?

And that was what the fraudsters were trying to get sent when they made the original phone call?

  On 16/09/2023 at 15:41, Sue said:

Ah. So it wasn't a completely new card, it was a replacement card for one he already had?

And that was what the fraudsters were trying to get sent when they made the original phone call?

Expand  

Not completely sure but this seems the case…..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...