Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Tim.Gurner, Australian tycoon calls for  layoffs to fix workers attitude.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-66803279

An interesting article which has gathered a lot of criticism towards Tim Gurner. 

His argument, in a nutshell, is that workers demand too much from employers and expect a company to bend over backwards for them. This, according to Tim, has been made worse following covid.

He believes higher unemployment rates will make workers keen to work for a company and less likely to demand more lenient working practices.

Looking from a worker point, I can see the anger this will cause, but understanding business I can also see the frustration employers face.

At the end of the day, a business is there to either make something, sell something or provide a service. The more demands a worker puts on the business, the higher the potential cost is to do business and the higher the end price to a consumer will be  

Are we starting to replicate similar issues faced in the 70s (British Leyland for example) where workers demands caused poor productivity and poor delivery? 

Without removing protection for Workers, is Tim Gurner right, wrong and do we need an adjustment between business and workers to rebalance expectations from both sides? 

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/332943-are-workers-over-privileged/
Share on other sites

Man who benefits from market forces doesn't like it when market forces affect him. 
 

He's a landlord, he doesnt make, or produce anything. He buys things using credit (unavailable to others) and then restricts supply to increase profit. 

Am i right to assume that your post was a polemic, otherwise you're almost both siding an argument for feudalism.

  • Like 1

How would he have become a 'tycoon' without workers? At the end of the day, a business is there to make a profit. Mostly for the owners of the business. There's nothing stopping either party parting company if they so choose. Perhaps there should be a recognition that they need each other......

Rather a sweeping statement on underprivileged workers.  Comparisons with the 1970s pander to the GB news crowd, it's like comparing a small punch up at a lower division football match with 1000s scrapping at Man U away matches in 1975.  A different world and a different scale.

Working life in Australia is also very different in the 1970s they called striking the "English disease" where days lost through industrial action down under per worker were higher down under.

For many sectors we need stronger worker protection, and better pay and conditions - hospitality, catering and care being great examples.  Hands up who orders food to be delivered by someone on zero hours contracts.  Rather than government saying over 50s should become delivery riders, better if they said that Deliveroo should make their riders PAYE, give them training, ensure they use lights and night and don't ride illegal bikes (better still provide them).

  • Like 2
  • 3 weeks later...

Greater exploitation doesn't increase productivity (quite the opposite), but is can increase profit. He wants higher unemployment so that he can exploit desperate people for his own enrichment. He sounds like a typical Tory.

Edited by Earl Aelfheah
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • An idea if you are looking for something to do. I’ve visited and have just come across this again.    Vauxhall City Farm is a farm in London where we can see the animals the packaged meat in the supermarket comes from. Entrance is free, a donation of £4 is requested   Looking for a present you can adopt an animal - support the farm and the person you gift it to will get 3 lots of food to feed on visits.    The 50th Anniversary Appeal is currently running so they can do the farm up and hopefully give the animals a home and people the chance to see them for another 50 years. If you want to donate here’s the link    https://www.justgiving.com/campaign/growthenext50years
    • Let's wait and see how many affordable family homes and social housing actually get built. 
    • I had thought it was to the actor Gary Cady, but apologies if that is wrong. The 'problem' with it as a restaurant venue is that it is built, as it were, to offer a 'country house' experience, but it is in an area where there is no passing trade, but where, quite close, there is a plethora of good restaurants. It therefore does not have a compelling niche or offer. When it's the only posh game in town, driving out to a country house venue has obvious attractions, but not when you can readily choose many other offers relatively close. It would only work if it could get a ** or *** Michelin rep, but it's never been able to build that. Hence looking for wedding or more dubious gigs. It has offered good 'nights' (such as night-club style magic performances) but it can't keep up sufficient regularity to build a loyal customer base. Ideally it needs, perhaps, an excellent existing up-market restaurant brand to move there, but again its positioning away from good public transport (West Dulwich doesn't have enough trains) doesn't make a compelling offer  in London.
    • So posh chicken then. Shame then that the supply of chicken is going to become harder to acquire and more expensive through the increased prevalence of bird flu 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...