Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Have had long-tailed tits very occasionally here....1 day last year there were five of them. Great and blue are the usual ones though, plus some coal.


Saw a nice male chaffinch on his own by Peckham Rye Park lake today, and a coot sat on her nest in the middle of it: then a robin in Dulwich Park. It was still quite wet out (although the rain had been stopped a while) so there seemed to be fewer people around, which of course is always good for seeing birds! :)

louisiana Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue, do you use any feeders or boxes now? I'm

> current;y looking at feeding and homing options to

> try to encourage the dears.

>

> But my even more exciting news today was *two*

> jays. First time. He's found a mate!


xxxxx


Hey, I love jays!


I'm embarrassed to admit that I have an empty feeder hanging up in the garden. I used to buy peanuts in bulk from eBay, but the supplier I used doesn't do them any more, I couldn't find anywhere else that was so cheap and I'm not rolling in money at the moment (or ever in fact :)) ).


Also I had a mouse and although I keep the peanuts in a closed plastic container the sack when it's full won't all fit in it, and I've got limited storage space.


However, in my defence, I have an urban jungle of a (very small) garden which has birds nesting in it each year (blackbirds and bluetits usually) and I do garden for wildlife with shrubs with berries etc..


I tried putting up a feeder with nigella seed to try and attract goldfinches, but so far as I know it didn't, thought something ate the seed!!!

Just found she's started doing them again so just ordered more peanuts, only trouble is I have to watch for squirrels ripping open the bird feeder and leaving whole peanuts about which baby birds can choke on.


?29.90 for 25kg, free delivery :)


My mouse died, hope they don't attract more :-S

SimonM Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >?29.90 for 25kg, free delivery

> That is cheap - are they shelled?


xxxxxxx


Yes - do a search on eBay, it's item number 120407721929, Economy wild bird peanuts.


Seller is misscardigan (but a search on that won't find it).


Alternatively www.wildbirdfood.uk.com - same seller but not on eBay, but has a very wide range of well-priced bird food.

This is a bit random but it's nature based so I'll put it here! I'd always wondered what those weeds with pretty blue flowers are that are in abundance at the moment. There's lots of them around ED station at the mo. Anyhow they are called Green Alkanet and the flowers are edible. So now you know!


http://www.dgsgardening.btinternet.co.uk/alkanet.htm

Good spot TheePope.


In the same plant family are comfrey and borage, also very common. I'm always being told by neighbours that all these are weeds, but all the critters love them to bits so they get to stay. And as you say, the flowers are quite pretty in a wild garden way.

TheePope Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'd always wondered what those weeds

> with pretty blue flowers are that are in abundance

> at the moment. There's lots of them around ED

> station at the mo. Anyhow they are called Green

> Alkanet and the flowers are edible. So now you

> know!

>

xxxxxx


They're very pretty but they're ******* invasive, and their roots go quite deep so they're hard to get rid of. They certainly seem to like it around ED, must be the soil I think.


The leaves are quite similar to foxglove leaves (though less broad and less grey) so if like me you're trying to encourage foxgloves but keep the alkanet to the back of the garden, it can be a problem trying to distinguish them.


Edited to say: Except when they're flowering, obviously.


Interested to hear that the flowers are edible, are they related to borage?

And they bloomin' well sting!


Saw another type of butterfly today. According to the Butterfly Trust it is a female Common Blue (but in fact brown).


identify a butterfly


Re the owl, probably a Tawny Owl. They like urban areas and give the familiar "twit twoo" sound.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • "They sold everyone, directly or indirectly, on the notion that Covid, the energy crisis and the war in Ukraine had nothing to do with the sorry state of the UK and that it was 14 years of Tory rule and Truss' nightmare budget that was the source of all the country's woes. " This simply isn't true. Global issues all play their own parts (as they do with other countries) but the UK govt had  been especially abject for years. Improvements could not be made with them in power. That's not to say everything is all roses when they go To claim parties shouldn't try and sell themselves in an election is absurd - but if labour did overpromise or dig into specifics (which they partly couldn't because they didn't have their hands on the books) then we live in a country where a population and media is happy to punch on them and relect the shabby last govt I mean if any argument I made was supported by some posters I would rethink it but thats just me
    • They just gave woolly and opaque policies on the basis of "we will not increase tax for working people" and then could not clearly define what a working person is. They sold everyone, directly or indirectly, on the notion that Covid, the energy crisis and the war in Ukraine had nothing to do with the sorry state of the UK and that it was 14 years of Tory rule and Truss' nightmare budget that was the source of all the country's woes. the moment they got in they lent in to the notion that change will be slow due to global challenges. The electorate are impatient and Labour were always going to have a huge job to keep people onside and bought in to the (long) journey the country is on to any sort of recovery. Their first 100 days should have been about solidifying the electorate's support for the journey but instead they have lurched from one own-goal to another and I think significantly distanced themselves from the electorate as they have behaved just like the Tories in many aspects of leadership (access to donors, clothing gate). Throw in spin on the £22bn gap (of which around £9bn was based on their own decisions), Winter Fuel payments ending and the attack on farmers (the very definition of working people) and it has been an utter disaster. They have a massive perceptual problem and seem incapable of delivering crisp messages that the people can get behind. Listening to members of the government trying to explain the intricacies and details of much of the aforementioned challenges is utterly painful to watch and people shut off after a couple of sentences. In opposition you can get away with soundbites and when you get scrutinised you can bridge to "14 years of hurt" and "we're not them" and people will buy it. When you're in the hot seat those things sounds hollow and suggest you don't have the answers and people will turn on you very quickly. It is in everyone's interests that they get it right because with a Tory party chasing the far-right vote because of Reform and Reform picking up disillusioned main political party voters then the alternative is really scary. Of course, we also have the threat from within the Labour party itself as if things don't go well for Starmer & co we could find Labour turning on itself.    
    • Pounds, Shillings and Pence. Still remember decimalisation day.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...