Jump to content

Recommended Posts

6m of double yellow lines to move one car back a bit. The person who complained about this hampering their private car park seems very selfish and not good at driving. 

https://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/documents/s115518/Appendix 15 Crystal Palace Road.pdf

  • Like 2
9 hours ago, legalalien said:

Officer proposals on various double yellow lines, moving bays, cycle hangars etc in Southwark including local area

https://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/mgIssueHistoryHome.aspx?IssueId=50031878&OptionNum=0

Thanks Legal. We can expect much, much more of this. Southwark is now the provider of hangars in the borough so it will be interesting to see how the management and maintenance side of that works. 
 

Do you know if there is a transcript for the council meeting the other night as posted on YouTube? The one where answers on really key topics, like whether there is a mandate for borough wide CPZ, were unintelligible?

I believe the rules require that monies 'earned' through road and parking pricing and through traffic fines can only be spent on roads (which might include e.g. planters).

But of course the council could earmark no other money on road expenditure, releasing funds for other spending heads.

Indeed it is possible that the council plans to make all its roads self financing, meaning that non car owners would then be paying for all the roads costs meaning cycling, public transport and pedestrian users would be getting that 'free ride' the council is so intent on trying to correct, as far as car owners are concerned.

If anyone cares to match road budgets with forecast road usage and fine income, we might see just how much of the road budget businesses and private owners are contributing and will contribute through this hypothecated revenue stream.

 

1 hour ago, mrwb said:

Is it possible to get access to the money generated from the various parking and other schemes from the council somehow ?

A very rough, back of a fag packet estimate based on the 2021 census data is around £12m pa from the permits.

Obviously, inter- CPZ parking charges and fines are on top of that.

Edited by David Peckham
Sp
11 hours ago, mrwb said:

Is it possible to get access to the money generated from the various parking and other schemes from the council somehow ?

They used to publish an annual parking monitoring report. They seem to have stopped that in 2019, presumably because they were embarrassed about how much net profit they were milking from residents. This is the last published data showing the surplus made from parking charges in the five years to 2018/19:

Financial Year:  2014/15        2015/16        2016/17           2017/18         2018/19

Surplus:              £5,152,000  £6,015,000   £6,796,000      £6,113,000     £7,025,000

https://www.southwark.gov.uk/assets/attach/11828/Annual-Report-on-Parking-and-funding-2018-19-.pdf

They said they were going to continue publishing parking data "in future Movement Plan Annual Monitoring Reports from 2019/20. This document will cover parking and funding data during the transition year" but I can't find those anywhere. 

 

In fact they haven't even been able to publish audited accounts since 2019/20. They have published three sets of unaudited annual accounts since then. https://www.southwark.gov.uk/council-and-democracy/key-documents/statement-of-accounts

 

 

 

Edited by CPR Dave

Hi Everyone,

We set up a group to oppose the CPZ when the consultation started in our area a few months ago. We'd like to expand the group to include all of Southwark. If we join our voices together, we can surely make ourselves heard.

Visit opposethecpz.org and get in touch if you can get involved.

Cheers,

Richard.

On 12/07/2023 at 23:47, CPR Dave said:

They used to publish an annual parking monitoring report. They seem to have stopped that in 2019, presumably because they were embarrassed about how much net profit they were milking from residents. This is the last published data showing the surplus made from parking charges in the five years to 2018/19:

Financial Year:  2014/15        2015/16        2016/17           2017/18         2018/19

Surplus:              £5,152,000  £6,015,000   £6,796,000      £6,113,000     £7,025,000

https://www.southwark.gov.uk/assets/attach/11828/Annual-Report-on-Parking-and-funding-2018-19-.pdf

They said they were going to continue publishing parking data "in future Movement Plan Annual Monitoring Reports from 2019/20. This document will cover parking and funding data during the transition year" but I can't find those anywhere. 

 

In fact they haven't even been able to publish audited accounts since 2019/20. They have published three sets of unaudited annual accounts since then. https://www.southwark.gov.uk/council-and-democracy/key-documents/statement-of-accounts

 

 

 

Out group has put in a FOI request to get this information from the council. They are legally obliged to publish this, but the link from their open data page goes to page not found.

On 11/07/2023 at 23:09, CPR Dave said:

6m of double yellow lines to move one car back a bit. The person who complained about this hampering their private car park seems very selfish and not good at driving. 

https://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/documents/s115518/Appendix 15 Crystal Palace Road.pdf

I’ve run past there over the last few days. The space between the end of the current double yellow lines and the start of the dropped curb is not a full car length. At the moment there is a transit van parked there that overhangs both the driveway and the double yellows. I expect this severely limits visibility for someone trying to exit the driveway for that block of flats. I expect the 6m of double yellows is to cover the existing small space plus the driveway (which currently has white hazard lines instead).  

The proposal isn’t as ridiculous as it first seems. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have been using Andy for many years for decorating and general handyman duties. He always does a great job, is very friendly and his prices are competitive. Highly recommend.
    • Money has to be raised in order to slow the almost terminal decline of public services bought on through years of neglect under the last government. There is no way to raise taxes that does not have some negative impacts / trade offs. But if we want public services and infrastructure that work then raise taxes we must.  Personally I'm glad that she is has gone some way to narrowing the inheritance loop hole which was being used by rich individuals (who are not farmers) to avoid tax. She's slightly rebalanced the burden away from the young, putting it more on wealthier pensioners (who let's face it, have been disproportionately protected for many, many years). And the NICs increase, whilst undoubtedly inflationary, won't be directly passed on (some will, some will likely be absorbed by companies); it's better than raising it on employees, which would have done more to depress growth. Overall, I think she's sailed a prudent course through very choppy waters. The electorate needs to get serious... you can't have European style services and US levels of tax. Borrowing for tax cuts, Truss style, it is is not. Of course the elephant in the room (growing ever larger now Trump is in office and threatening tariffs) is our relationship with the EU. If we want better growth, we need a closer relationship with our nearest and largest trading block. We will at some point have to review tax on transport more radically (as we see greater up take of electric vehicles). The most economically rational system would be one of dynamic road pricing. But politically, very difficult to do
    • Labour was right not to increase fuel duty - it's not just motorists it affects, but goods transport. Fuel goes up, inflation goes up. Inflation will go up now anyway, and growth will stagnate, because businesses will pass the employee NIC hikes onto customers.  I think farms should be exempt from the 20% IHT. I don't know any rich famers, only ones who work their fingers to the bone. But it's in their blood and taking that, often multi-generation, legacy out of the family is heart-breaking. Many work to such low yields, and yet they'll often still bring a lamb to the vet, even if the fees are more than the lamb's life (or death) is worth. Food security should be made a top priority in this country. And, even tho the tax is only for farms over £1m, that's probably not much when you add it all up. I think every incentive should be given to young people who want to take up the mantle. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...