Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I would say, once drivers are wise to a camera the same is true all over. Cameras probably only catch out drivers who are unaware or where they are obscured. The way round that would be to keep changing where the cameras are, but doubt that is technically possible. I am all for fining drivers who wantonly speed on a regular basis. Everyone sometimes slips over the limit by a bit.

There are specific rules about where and when speed cameras are allowed, based around the number of incidents - and their seriousness (and they have to have been identified as being caused by excess speed)  and the %age of people travelling over the permitted maximum speed (85% I believe). They can't (or shouldn't) be randomly plonked down or moved. Some speed indicators are advisory, not statutory.

Advisory vs  mandatory 20 mph would appear to be an urban myth, for example on GB news.  A nice article on 20 mph on a random website  https://www.carwow.co.uk/blog/are-20mph-speed-limits enforceable#gref

This includes comments on a DfT metastudy that I saw a few years ago which showed disappointingly 20mph aren't having a massive impact on average speeds in urban area.

Some numbers from GLA, around a quarter of a million prosecutions over five months in 2022 for speeding of which over a 100,000 were 20mph zones, so quite a few of us are being prosecuted.  Not clear how many were fixed penalties, points or speed awareness courses.  I'm surprised how many people I know who have done the latter.

It would have helped if DfT had actually clarified whether 20mph was enforceable (which looks a very big yes).

 

  On 18/07/2023 at 15:15, malumbu said:

Advisory vs  mandatory 20 mph would appear to be an urban myth, for example on GB news. 

Expand  

I think you'll find that advisory speed limit notifications are a thing

https://www.carbuyer.co.uk/tips-and-advice/166095/what-is-the-national-speed-limit#:~:text=The ones that flash in,enforceable speed limits per se.

  On 18/07/2023 at 23:37, OutOfFocus said:

They SHOULD be placed randomly IMHO.  Otherwise people slow down for them.

Expand  

Actually, I believe there are specific rules about placement of fixed speed cameras - which must be properly signed and visible and can only be placed where there have been RTAs where excessive speed has been a contributory factor and/ or I think where 85% of passing traffic is travelling over the statutory limit for the road section. They are there to discourage speeding as a safety measure, not specifically to catch speeding motorists as a revenue generator (which would very much be our council's choice, I'm guessing). People slowing down (in 'dangerous' spots) is their precise aim.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I might be able to help - text me and I will send you some details 07972 368 261
    • Yeah but I suppose the issue is that Brexit/Truss moment destabilised our economy and Trump's Truss moment is destabilising every economy globally and rocking the very foundation of global trading. Our stupid moments were just our stupid moments - Trump's stupid moment is everyone's stupid moment. The fact that people have been getting out of gold as well as stocks speaks volumes - gold is normally the safe-haven investors head for but lots are just cashing out completely.
    • Imagine a country voting for something that has a major financial hit to a country and having an electorate and different governments too proud/embarrased/dumb to reverse said decision After 9 years America and Trump might be on a different scale but England could do with a bit of reflection before judging other countries (at a national level.  I know lots of you sane, wise posters are not culpable) 
    • The real worry is that Trump will never admit he got anything wrong and, as he did today with more threats to China, will keep doubling-down. Those tactics might work in real estate in the US but this is not real estate. I do wonder whether other governments will be forced to absorb the short-term pain in the view that they need to let him crash things to such a point that Americans go...what are you doing. Although he seems to be trying to mitigate dissent within his own party by turning on them quickly - like all good dictators do. It just seems ludicrous to think this puts the US in a stronger short-term position - I saw analysis that a Boeing 787 bill of materials now costs $20m more with the tariffs due to them only being assembled in the US and the parts manufactured all over the world. Just who is this supposed to be benefiting.  American 401ks are linked to the stock market so American pensions are going downhill fast.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...