Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It’s getting ridiculous now. I do understand why parents are worried about cycling with their kids on the roads but the amount of people cycling on the paths of East Dulwich is totally unacceptable. 

My son was nearly knocked the the ground coming out of our front garden by someone speeding past on a bike. Someone is going to be seriously injured.

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/329038-cyclists-taking-over-paths/
Share on other sites

Cut the stereotypes please.  As for parents/carers not encouraging their kids to ride on the road when they are old/responsible/competent enough, or when they are younger responsible adults riding on the road with, that's my starting point .  I'd ask government through my MP about this and report back.  Rather than setting off the knee jerk responses you will get here 

  • Agree 1
4 hours ago, alice said:

This is nothing to do with stereotypes. You can’t be unaware that they’re is more cycling on pavements than ever before. I do it myself on wide pavements. 

I agree. Definitely more cycling on pavements going on, including on those without dedicated cycle paths. In an earlier post elsewhere, someone observed that cycling on pavements had been more or less decriminalised. If cyclists begin to feel more 'entitled' about cycling on any pavement then, yes, there will be more injuries.

  • Thanks 1

Probably a good time to post the latest BarbyonaBike rogue gallery of cyclists.....some classics here:

 

0.27 that was close!

0.41 Dulwich Library the favourite bike light jumping spot

3.54 Using pedestrians as a chicane on a crossing on a jacked Lime bike

5.16 Is the Full Kit Wally lost?

5.21 The one handed cycling cricketer whilst using the phone onto the pavement is some skill!

6.23 Is that a baby or a doll?

 

 

  • Like 1
On 05/07/2023 at 19:41, Rockets said:

Probably a good time to post the latest BarbyonaBike rogue gallery of cyclists.....some classics here:

 

0.27 that was close!

0.41 Dulwich Library the favourite bike light jumping spot

3.54 Using pedestrians as a chicane on a crossing on a jacked Lime bike

5.16 Is the Full Kit Wally lost?

5.21 The one handed cycling cricketer whilst using the phone onto the pavement is some skill!

6.23 Is that a baby or a doll?

 

 

Because they can!

cyclists can knock people over or go into the backs of cars & cycle off…… until of course they do it to the wrong person 😒

many people are entitled in these times. Really sad!

I personally feel you need a license of some sort to cycle on highways……. As well as insurance!

  • Thanks 1
2 hours ago, sweetgirl said:

Because they can!

cyclists can knock people over or go into the backs of cars & cycle off…… until of course they do it to the wrong person 😒

many people are entitled in these times. Really sad!

I personally feel you need a license of some sort to cycle on highways……. As well as insurance!

Meanwhile. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/jul/06/car-crashes-into-primary-school-in-south-london-wimbledon

  • Like 2

I agree it’s a pain and a menace. It’s all comers - yoovz, yummy mummies, OAPs, trendy daddies, MAMILs. Every one of them thinks the rules don’t apply because “insert solipsistic excuse here”. If you do it, you’re selfish and irresponsible (but you’re likely not to acknowledge that to yourself to protect your shaky self image). 

Most cyclists cycle on the road.  Beyond a quick short cut, getting round traffic blocking the road and the like I don't know why cyclists use pavements and nor do you.  We can speculate all we want.  This thread won't sort out the issue.  It's not even a proper soap box.  Those who don't follow the highway code whatever sort of road user don't post here.  Well apart from Alice.  And someone when younger who felt entitled (mainly ignoring speed limits) ie me!

Dodging bikes is now becoming a daily sport for many in Dulwich. Is it a lack of cycling education/ignorance or pig headedness? Are these folks even aware of the rules? It seems not many are aware of the rules as I have yet to see a single cyclist give way to pedestrians at junctions (I am sure there are those that do but the majority don't).

Many years ago my old aunt was knocked down outside the now Sainsbury's local, by a child on a bike. Already disabled with one leg shorter than the other and wearing a surgical boot, people rushed to help her but the boy cycled off quickly . She was in pain for years afterwards. Many local people have hearing impairments and would not hear a cyclist coming up on the pavement behind them. Equally a blind or partially sighted person would not automatically move out of the way of a cyclist.  

On 07/07/2023 at 09:19, sweetgirl said:

I personally feel you need a license of some sort to cycle on highways

I personally feel you need a licence of some sort to use the internet. 

What utter bs you spout. Most people who cycle on carriageways in and around London already have a licence to drive motor-vehicles.

 

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
On 07/07/2023 at 02:33, Hen123 said:

As you may have heard the driver experienced a medical episode!

such a sad situation for all involved 🙏🏽

 

Four parents on (racing) bicycles on the footpath with kiddies riding beside on seen within five minutes on E D Grove this morning. When I pointed out that it was for pedestrians I got hard stares - pretty common to be angry once thry are told they’re in the wrong (especially when they always knew they were!). Also, two parents on Road on bicycles as their kids cycled very acceptably and legally on the pavement. 

I used to cycle down EDG on the road with my young child cycling beside me on the pavement. To go at the same slow speed as the child didn't feel safe at all tbh for either me or the child. So can well understand why some parents might go on the pavement when supervising young ones. 

The type of bike they are riding has little relevance, but if you mention that they were on racers/road bikes to convey a spectrum of acceptableness or otherwise, I would say that if such riders are travelling slowly and give way courteously to peds then that behaviour would be at the low end of that spectrum.

The alternative for them might be a level of physical risk they're not okay with or being ,yet another family driving up and down EDG four times a day for the sake of the school run, and no-one wants that either. 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...