Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The plastic bowl attachment for my newly bought a heavy duty(delete brand name prior to administrator doing so)hand blender has just developed a big old crack(No, not like Vanessa Feltz'), and it got me to thinking about how shoddy everything I buy these days seems to be. I know I shouldnt be too surprised but I do expect things to last a couple of years at least, I mean why-o-why-o-why-o-why etc. Disgruntled of Tunbridge Wells.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3289-built-in-obsolescence/
Share on other sites

I know what you mean. When I was growing up we used this. We had it for over twenty years and it never skipped a beat. My mum told me she threw it away two years ago becausae it was so old.... still working.... *sigh* I nearly cried. It was what began my love of cooking.

Keef has been asking on another fred, ideas for upgrading his fone as an example - not a dig at Keef BTW, but just as an example


will it make that much difference to your life getting a "better" phone ? will you have better , more illuminating conversations ?


apparently there a 3 mobile for every man / woman/Child in the UK - most of which are unused now - thats an awful lot of effort and rescoruces being utterly wasted for vanity/ sales/hype.


it rubbish.

Ok bon3r I?ll indulge you. Here?s one of my pet annoyances:


Fucking motorcars man!


They CAN be built properly and simply so that they rarely break down and when they do any pillock with 2 brain cells and a spanner can fix them.


The concept hasn?t changed in 100 years. Chassis, body, internal combustion engine, gearbox, drive shaft, steering column, braking and suspension systems.


But no they have to fill them up with pointless fiddly bits that are built to wear out in 5 ? 10 years.


70 years ago Germany came up with the Beetle, a car that is practical, indestructible, easy to drive and fix, a 50 year old one will get you from the Cape to Cairo without much hassle and it is still stylish. Why can?t they do it now?

To be fair Brendan, and I'm hoping your not a big VW Beetle fan, they are one of the worst cars ever.


Engine - air-cooled(!), slow, noisy, inefficient, polluting. 4 gears?!

Ride - abysmal, shit suspension

Interior - don't even go there unless you spend thousands on mods

Handling - brakes are awful but as you can never go more than 30mph its not so bad. Corners are best avoided unless all persons and goods are firmly strapped down.


But otherwise your point was spot on. That's why my next car is going to be one of these:


The mighty Rover P5b


Like a turret-less Sherman tank! Indestructible. All the bumpers are chrome. If you have a small ping just hammer and smooth it out rather than replace a whole plastic unit at the cost of hundreds.


I have the same opinion on clothes. By stuff that lasts. Tweed mainly.

David David David. Talk like that is like waving a tory flag at MacGabhann


The air-cooled engine was what made the bug what is was, simple and reliable. It wasn?t designed as a high performance car but rather one that will just go, and go and go wherever you send it and carry on going for 100 years as long as you put petrol in.


And then go some more.


The torsion bar suspension was low maintenance and strong and what gives bugs their ability to deal with all terrains. The ride may be a bit hard but they compensated by making the seats extra springy.


I remember once going to a festival in SA where you had to negotiate a dirt road over a hill to get into the valley where it was held. It had been raining and the 3 series BMW we were in got horrible stuck in the mud, behind a 4x4 VW Caravel. A guy in another 4x4 stopped to help us and promptly got himself stuck too. This entire time Beetle after hippy laden Beetle chugged up the hill past us without so much as a spin of the tires.


I also know people who live out in the bush in places like Mozambique and Botswana and all will swear to you that if you can?t afford something like a Toyota Hilux a Beetle (even though they are all at least 25 years old) is the way to go for a car that can handle it off road, has a good torque, starts every time and wont leave you stranded somewhere.


As for the interior, well I think this original is pretty cool :


http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/91/1949_VW_dash_.jpg


Handling? Handling?

Have you never seen a Herbie film man?

I know, but if it were not for the need for an efficient & proven a/c motor that would work in a range of temperatures and conditions with no fuss, to ensure that the averge a german ciziten would be able to make use of the newly built autobahns, then the invasion of Czechoslvakia & its highly valued Skoda works would not have been so pressing

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...