Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I live up at the Over / Underhill end of East Dulwich. We seem to have some very poor links to the train stations.

There isn't a ED bus link to Honor Oak Park, which is a great station, not very crowded with a fast and reliable line into London Bridge and Charing X direct (on occasion).

From Honor oak Park, there are busses to Nunhead, Brockley, Forest Hill, West Dulwich etc but all skirt around us. As this station is going to be part of the East London line extension, I think it would be wise to apply some pressure to TFL to get them to extend the 363 and 63 up to Honor oak park so we all have some more options. Currently the 363 and 63 stop about 600 metres away on the other side of the hill - which seems very strange to me.

Please can everyone go to the following page and send an email to apply some pressure to help improve our links and also relieve some pressure on ED station!


TFL

Thanks!

I think this is a great idea. Honor Oak Park is a very useful station which I use frequently. (I walk and it takes about 14mins at a fairly brisk pace). Even with a bus going up the hill I would still probably walk but I think it would make Honor Oak Park a viable commuter station for those at the top end of Lordship lane.


I'm off to the website now.

Interstingly enough, TfL was conducting a survey of the 63 and 363 routes last week (on the Tuesday after Bank Holiday Monday). Every passenger was asked to fill in a form setting out where they lived, where they were going and how they had got to their bus-stop. I did it on both my trips to and from work, so I asked what the survey was all about, and after the usual guff (ways to improve bus service etc) the surveyor said that it doesn't really make sense to have the 363 and the 63 as they both cover such similar routes. One of the options being considered is extending the 63 to Crystal Palace and removing the 363 all together, but others include different start/end points for both services. The 363 doesn't stop at Forest Hill Road by the way, but continues up Wood Vale, very briefly down Underhill Road, onto Sydenham Hill and then CP Parade.


With my cynical head on, I thought the Tuesday after a Bank Holiday was a sneaky time to conduct a survey if you want to demonstrate that the services aren't full to capacity at peak time (as they normally are). The bus was half empty whereas it would normally be full by the third or fourth stop.


So it might be a good time to email TFL as you suggest. The most practical option would be to extend the 63 up to Honor Oak Station, but you'd still have to walk up to Forest Hill Road to catch it. You could get the 363 more easily from where you are, but I don't quite understand how it would go via Honor Oak Park and then onto Elephant and Castle. Would involve a right turn at Wood Vale to Honor Oak Station and then a U-turn back to E&C/Peckham way. Do you have a specific route in mind?

The 63 used to go from King Cross to Crystal Palace and then TFL decided to split the route so that the 63 started at Kings Cross and terminates by the Forest Hill Tavern and I believe the 363 is Elephant and Castle to Crystal Palace.


I think perhaps a new smaller bus should be introduced, they have the P12 but that diverts off to Brenchley Gardens, which is no good if you live at the bottom end of Forest Hill Rd near Peckham Rye park.


I have been on the website but I am sure this has been suggested in the past. Hopefully with the East London line extension, this might get more notice.

If the 63 went over the hill, down past Honor Oak train station, it could terminate at the bottom of the hill, on Brockley Rise (other routes terminate/wait there) and then turn around and head back toward Kings Cross. The 363 could just be left to go on the Crystal Palace.

Although they would have to sort out the parking on Honor Oak Park as you come down the hill, just before the station, as the small hop on and off buses sometimes get stuck there.

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Of course if the station was more accessible then

> it would lose much of it's charm and become just

> another crammed London station.


Exactly don't know if the station could cope with the influx of bus loads from East Dulwich & the noise a double decker would make a little hoppa type bus maybe.

very good idea to get the 63 to carry on up that steep hill past the Francesca Cabrini primary school and to Honor Oak station. However, I recall speaking to a bus driver about the fact it's a damn nuisance there are no buses going straight up and over the said hill. he said it was because icy conditions can make driving up the steep hill very hard, if not impossible. He said that was why no big buses went up and over the hill.

Ha Ha! Yes, those famous mountainous ice covered peaks of south London..!

He was taking the mickey!

Good on you all for supporting this - However, to sean, who along with Snorky is the prophet of doom in every circumstance... Having an unused train station - or even underutilized is not a good idea as it simply adds pressure to other routes, and investment in the underused one falls away.

who knew eh? me and snorks... the "prophets of doom"


Not just today. But in "every circumstance"


Let me leave that one sink in....


but first, to come to my defence (as I must!) my statement about the train station is neither prophetic, nor doomy (ish? ly?)


Your comment around efficiency is bang on but it will be a busier station so, you know.. as the post was about how lovely and quiet it is to use.. THAT BIT will have changed. That's just logic.


As for extending buses to actually head into HOP itself I'm all for it

Siduhe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

Every passenger was asked to fill in a form setting out where they

> lived, where they were going and how they had got

> to their bus-stop. I did it on both my trips to

> and from work, so I asked what the survey was all

> about, and after the usual guff (ways to improve

> bus service etc) the surveyor said that it doesn't

> really make sense to have the 363 and the 63 as

> they both cover such similar routes. One of the

> options being considered is extending the 63 to

> Crystal Palace and removing the 363 all together,

> but others include different start/end points for

> both services. The 363 doesn't stop at Forest

> Hill Road by the way, but continues up Wood Vale,

> very briefly down Underhill Road, onto Sydenham

> Hill and then CP Parade.

>

> With my cynical head on, I thought the Tuesday

> after a Bank Holiday was a sneaky time to conduct

> a survey if you want to demonstrate that the

> services aren't full to capacity at peak time (as

> they normally are). The bus was half empty

> whereas it would normally be full by the third or

> fourth stop.



I recall when there was only the 63 bus route, before the 'gentrification' of East Dulwich and am horrified that TFL are even considering removing the 363 as this route is constantly busy and delayed for one reason or another in the mornings.


I would hope if they removed the 363 that they would increase the frequency of the 63 bus route from what it currently is ...

Talking about the Honor Oak Park route, what is wrong with the P4?


I have never come across a more unreliable bus in London!


I'm almost always late for work nowadays as can spend anything between 15-30 minutes waiting for the bus:o( There is no set schedule and it's just a daily lottery to see if a bus turns up soon after me!


I'm off to send another e-mail to TFL.

Reply from TFL:



Dear Sir / Madam


Thank you for your email.


I was interested to read your suggestion to extend bus route 63, and I can appreciate why you feel this change would be beneficial.


While there are no current plans to amend the route in the manner you have described, I would like to assure you that we continually monitor the bus network to see if any changes can be made to improve the level of service offered to passengers. The suggestions we receive from passengers are an important part of this process.


Please be assured that we make every effort to connect local centres and residential, however, it is not always possible to provide a direct link for every journey or implement all of the suggestions we receive. Ultimately, we have to make sure that we use the resources available to provide services that will benefit the majority of passengers using a route.


Your comments will be kept so that they may be taken into consideration when routes 63 and other services in the area are next formally reviewed.


Yours sincerely


Customer Services

TJ. It's quite simple and I'm surprised you didn't know this. Walk up to the end of Underhill Rd from where you are past the blind care home and concrete house turn left onto the end of Lordship Lane and catch the P4 which stops right outside Honor Oak Park station. Five minute walk and a couple of minutes on the bus.

Thanks Jah, Fine for me - but not my pregnant missus. She gets out of puff very quickly. Also, if i was going to walk to LL I would justtake a bus to Forest hill or Denmark hill.

I just would like to see the 363 route extended 400 metres up forest hill road.... it would just help link up more areas to HOP.


MP - Touche!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
    • Another recommendation for Silvano. I echo everything the above post states. I passed first time this week with 3 minors despite not starting to learn until my mid-30s. Given the costs for lessons I have heard, he's also excellent value.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...