Jump to content

Re-usable nappies. Totbots, Smartipants, Little lamb. Selling all as a bundle for £50 or separately £5 a nappy


Recommended Posts

Whole lot for £50

Per nappy £5

DM for any specifics 🙂 


PHOTO 1:

Totbots 

PeeNut wraps size 2 x 5, size 1 x 1 

Peenut pad small  x2 larger x2

Bamboozle night insert size 2 x4 with 4x extra pads stretch 

3x all in one easyfit  

(EDIT: one wrap, one bamboozle, two all-in-ones sold)

 

PHOTO 2:

Smartipants x6 

Little lamb x1 

Littles and blooms x1 

7x bamboo inserts 

2 x nappy washing machine net bags 

15L nappy bin 

(EDIT: 2 smartipants sold)

IMG_2678.jpeg

IMG_2679.jpeg

  • Ling changed the title to Re-usable nappies. Totbots, Smartipants, Little lamb. Selling all as a bundle for £50 or separately £5 a nappy

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • in reply to my own "Where did you get this from?" response to your post at https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/353788-is-rachel-reeves-becoming-the-new-liz-truss/?do=findComment&comment=1688310, in which you again spoke of the government's "doubling the national debt". You seem not to understand the meaning of "national debt".  Have you perhaps been relying on someone else's usage? I'm sorry to hear of Starmer's decimation.
    • PetitionCall a General Election I would like there to be another General Election. I believe the current Labour Government have gone back on the promises they laid out in the lead up to the last election. Sign this petition 2,500,822 signatures 2,501,025 signatures
    • Keys now back with rightful owner.
    • in response to   On 19/11/2024 at 08:36, Moovart said: I know nothing about farming so can't really comment but when I read things like this interesting thread from Guy Shrubsole I am increasingly cynical about those making the loudest noise.  And yes it is a genuine link.   I've just had a look at the page source.  It contains a link to a Twitter page that's been automatically embedded in Moovart's post but seems not now operative. So I've dug out the url to have another try, this time without embedding:  https://x.com/guyshrubsole/status/1858490339356533018 .  Seems ok.   in reply to my own "Where did you get this from?" response to your post at https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/353788-is-rachel-reeves-becoming-the-new-liz-truss/?do=findComment&comment=1688310, in which you again spoke of the government's "doubling the national debt". You seem not to understand the meaning of "national debt".  Might you have been copying someone else's usage? I'm sorry to hear of Starmer's decimation. ================ And the para below was originally a totally new separate post but has also been merged.  Good night forum. The above merging of my posts in response to Sue and to Jazzer have been done by the forum system, so there's no point in my trying again to separate them.  I've already tried editing out the merging and reposting the one to jazzer, but ended up with the same forced merge.  Apologies. Latest edit.  The moral seems to be: don't try making two consecutive posts or they'll be liable to merging.  I've now been able to post a freestanding reply to jazzer's post now that there's an intervening post.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...