Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Over the years I remember a time when the odd car drove around the park, usually with an elderly person inside. I do not recall it ever being used as a cut through and if it was those instances would be vanishingly rare.

In my experience Dulwich Park has always been used as a park and only a park, oh and also a place to exercise police horses. Don't know if the local riding school still gets out on the sand route.

Anyway, relevance to this Lime Bike thread is pretty much zero, other than to observe that the fastest 'traffic' through the park these days is from cycling commuters, who do use it as a cut through. Sadly, many do not observe the 5mph, which though not legally obliged to we might agree that as a courtesy to others, they should.

 

Edited by first mate
27 minutes ago, first mate said:

I do not recall it ever being used as a cut through and if it was those instances would be vanishingly rare.

I've seen a delivery van, 2 PHVs and multiple Deliveroo motorcyclists...just this year! 

1 hour ago, Dogkennelhillbilly said:

I've seen a delivery van, 2 PHVs and multiple Deliveroo motorcyclists...just this year! 

I have seen a delivery van too - delivering to the cafe in the middle of the park - hardly using it as a cut-through....

 

I have also seen cars with wheelchairs parking in the places for cars with wheelchairs because, you know, people in wheelchairs often find it difficult to get to and from parks and therefore are afforded special permission to park their car with wheelchairs in the park....are we supposed to stop that now too....?

 

I am finding it incredible that someone is trying to suggest that Dulwich Park was a major thoroughfare in the 1960s....that it was a "rat run".....

 

 

I vividly remember being driven through the park from the village side to the south circular circa 1980 /1981 it wasn't a rat run bit was used by cars who wanted a scenic drive 

Not sure whwn that was stopped but it was akin to driving through Richmond park 

Edited by Spartacus

Sorry, I don't know. 
 

In answer to March, can we stick to the subject of Lime bikes please? If you want to start a new thread on local driving issues in the 60's and 70's, go ahead.

Do people here think that cyclists should stick to around 5mph when using the park as a cut through for the daily commute? Do you support using the park for velodrome type speed cycling and if so, why?

3 hours ago, Dogkennelhillbilly said:

I've seen a delivery van, 2 PHVs and multiple Deliveroo motorcyclists...just this year! 

Rather disingenuous post, motorcyclists are on two wheels;  not cars. 

As Rockets pointed out, you see delivery vans for the cafe and also vehicles for park maintenance and upkeep- hardly rat run material.

As I say elsewhere, e-bikes and cyclists are the ones currently using Dulwich Park as a cut through.

  • Haha 1

Daft trying to enforce a 5mph speed limit, you'd have to ticket runners too.  Haven't you had enough of looking for every reason to criticise cyclists?  Bike hire is a great concept, obviously a few rough edges to sort out.  Cycling has numerous benefits, a few cyclists do things that upset you.  There are worse things in life. 

Back to the suggestion, how would you enforce an unenforceable speed limit?

9 hours ago, first mate said:

Rather disingenuous post, motorcyclists are on two wheels;  not cars. 

As Rockets pointed out, you see delivery vans for the cafe and also vehicles for park maintenance and upkeep- hardly rat run material.

ooooooOOOOooooOOooooHHhhhh

Nope, these were all trying to cut through from College Rd to Court Lane - they drove through the inner gate (which I think is being replaced, finally), along the pathway to the Court Lane gates, and then realised their mistake. 50/50 on whether they then squeezed through the bollards across the pavement or backtracked.

I think it's more a case of the drivers "seeing" the surface on a GPS and trying to outsmart the route they've been told to take. I dont think it happens very often - bollards are pretty effective at traffic management, and one of the PHVs was let through by poor traffic management after one of the events.

10 hours ago, malumbu said:

Back to the suggestion, how would you enforce an unenforceable speed limit?

I once got stopped in Battersea Park whilst cycling by a Parks Police officer who tried to issue a PCN for cycling on the riverside walk (which I, at the time, had no idea cycling was not allowed on and actually successfully argued that there was no signage to inform people of such). Parks Police aren't police they are council employees dressed up as police.

 

Given the high level of crimes in and around the park maybe the council could repurpose some of the traffic wardens they have flocking to the area to wander around the park to both provide a visual deterrent to those in the park up to no good (especially around school chuck out time) and they could also remind fast cyclists of their need to slow down (not many at all adhere to the 5pm limit in the park). So many people I know hate walking in the park (especially around school drop off and pick-up time) for fear of them or their dogs being hit by cyclists - the two most worrying sounds in the park are the hum of a Lime bike approaching from behind at great speed or the bone-shaker banging of a school  drop-off cargo bike hurtling up behind you. A couple of weeks ago I saw the aftermath of a coming together of a Lime bike and a small child on a scooter (but didn't see the accident happen so cannot comment on who was in the wrong).

 

Maybe there is also an argument (like that in Battersea Park) that cyclists should have to walk in the areas most used by pedestrians or the areas where large numbers of pedestrians congregate.

That's such a cyclist attitude: you were breaking the law then harassed the guy until he let you off. Then try and paint yourself as the good guy.

 

If anyone needed anymore evidence that cyclists are scofflaws with double standards, then here it is.

Wrong thread Earl, this is about Lime Bikes not Dulwich Park in the 60's. But as a serial deflector and derailer (hope you appreciate my little cycling pun) perhaps you could change gears and start a separate thread on your other passion - cars in Dulwich in the 60's and 70's, and please take March with you.

Seriously, stop it!

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Have you ridden a Lime Bike without the motor running.  Very heavy, so can't see them going much over 14mph.  What is recommended speed in any case?  I can keep up with traffic on the flat 20mph and I am no spring chicken.  They are doing twice that at the velodrome, very exciting, come on down!


If you want to speed cycle get on a 30mph plus road or go to a velodrome.

My view is that on dual purpose paths ie those with dedicated cycle paths, cyclists should still proceed with caution, on paths that are not dual use unless deserted, cyclists should dismount and walk, in the park cyclists should proceed with caution and not exceed 5mph, if lots of pedestrians they probably should consider dismounting and walking. Paths and Parks are spaces where pedestrians take precedence, in my view. I would make an exception for mobility scooters.

Edited by first mate

Earl, obviously you did not read my last post, here it is again below; top tip 'recommended' in DP is 5mph, but you already know that with your extensive reading around DP and traffic. Elsewhere road speeds are generally indicated, on paths that do not have dedicated cycle ways, I believe cyclists should dismount and push."

"


If you want to speed cycle get on a 30mph plus road or go to a velodrome.

My view is that on dual purpose paths ie those with dedicated cycle paths, cyclists should still proceed with caution, on paths that are not dual use unless deserted, cyclists should dismount and walk, in the park cyclists should proceed with caution and not exceed 5mph, if lots of pedestrians they probably should consider dismounting and walking. Paths and Parks are spaces where pedestrians take precedence, in my view. I would make an exception for mobility scooters.

 

  • 1 month later...

Interesting to see this article which shows a marked England wide drop in cycling usage. Whilst in London I suspect the numbers are still relatively high, there does appear to be a problem with the dream. 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/cycling/2024/11/06/how-the-great-cycling-boom-collapsed-lockdown/

Watching scrutiny sessions is the best way of determining what might happen. Southwark do have concerns about Lime and these have been articulated in meetings, but Lime are holding out one big fat carrot, which is funding infrastructure for hybrid use. It's going to be hard for the cash-strapped council -allegedly, except when it's Vanity Square and its Indian import paving- to turn that offer down.

  • Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...