Jump to content

Recommended Posts

As a ploy to scrap the No. 12 bus route, the frequency was reduced from every 5 minutes to every 12 minutes about a year ago. The claim that covid had reduced passenger numbers was touted as a reason at the time. 

Now that the No. 12 is safe (for the time being) and (according to WHO) Covid is over, passenger numbers have started to steadily increase to a point where the infrequently of the No. 12 makes it crowded at most times of the day.

Isn't it time for residents and councillors to campaign to TfL to increase the frequency of this much used bus route again ? 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/326203-no-12-bus-route-frequency/
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...

TfL are launching a campaign  "highlighting the value and benefits public transport offers people with all travel needs and budgets", the organisation said. 

This comes as they say buses are near pre pandemic levels of usage. 

BBC News - Tube passenger numbers at 85% of pre-Covid levels, says TfL
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-66451211

with this information, why are we still suffering a reduction in bus capacity locally (no 12 for instance) as logically increasing frequency will help get more people using buses and out of other forms of transport. 

and before anyone uses the "cars slow buses down" line, the 12 was reduced due to falling numbers during covid. 

  • 1 month later...
  • 4 months later...

Just seen that the no 12 service has been changed to every 13 minutes 

https://tfl.gov.uk/modes/buses/bus-changes#on-this-page-1

So rather than adding more buses make it a reliable service, TFL have made it more sparse and therefore more crowded and reduced the impetus to use public transport 🤔

4 hours ago, hanlanf said:

Up north or anyway outside London, you’d be lucky to get one bus an hour. Still a good service in the grand scheme of things. 

Maybe just get the 40 to Elephant and Castle and swap buses there? 😴

When I lived in the country, there was one bus a WEEK to the nearest large town, in the morning, and one bus back in the afternoon of the same day.

This was to enable people to do their weekly shop. Luckily, I had a car 🤣

I haven't had any issues with the 12. We are lucky that it starts at the top of Barry Road, so at least going in that direction it is easy to get a seat.

Although if you are going further than Peckham it's quicker, as you say, to get another bus and change, because the 12 goes a very long way round to get to Camberwell Green and onwards from there ... 

 

Edited by Sue

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think it's connected with the totem pole renovation celebrations They have passed now, but the notice has been there since then (at least that's when I first saw it - I passed it on the 484 and also took a photo!)
    • Labour was damned, no matter what it did, when it came to the budget. It loves go on about the black hole, but if Labour had had its way, we'd have been in lockdown for longer and the black hole would be even bigger.  Am I only the one who thinks it's time the NHS became revenue-generating? Not private, but charging small fees for GP appts, x-rays etc? People who don't turn up for GP and out-patient appointments should definitely be charged a cancellation fee. When I lived in Norway I got incredible medical treatment, including follow up appointments, drugs, x-rays, all for £200. I was more than happy to pay it and could afford to. For fairness, make it somehow means-tested.  I am sure there's a model in there somewhere that would be fair to everyone. It's time we stopped fetishising something that no longer works for patient or doctor.  As for major growth, it's a thing of the past, no matter where in the world you live, unless it's China. Or unless you want a Truss-style, totally de-regulated economy and love capitalism with a large C. 
    • If you read my post I expect a compromise with the raising of the cap on agricultural property so that far less 'ordinary' farmers do not get caught  Clarkson is simply a high profile land owner who is not in the business as a conventional farmer.  Here's a nice article that seems to explain things well  https://www.sustainweb.org/blogs/nov24-farming-budget-inheritance-tax-apr/ It's too early to speculate on 2029.  I expect that most of us who were pleased that Labour got in were not expecting anything radical. Whilst floating the idea of hitting those looking to minimise inheritance tax, including gifting, like fuel duty they also chickened put. I'm surprised that anyone could start touting for the Tories after 14 years of financial mismanagement and general incompetence. Surly not.  A very low bar for Labour but they must be well aware that there doesn't need to be much of a swing form Reform to overturn Labour's artificially large majority.  But even with a generally rabid right wing press, now was the opportunity to be much braver.
    • And I worry this Labour government with all of it's own goals and the tax increases is playing into Farage's hands. With Trump winning in the US, his BFF Farage is likely to benefit from strained relations between the US administration and the UK one. As Alastair Campbell said on a recent episode of The Rest is Politics who would not have wanted to be a fly on the wall of the first call between Angela Rayner and JD Vance....those two really are oil and water. Scary, scary times right now and there seems to be a lack of leadership and political nous within the government at a time when we really need it - there aren't many in the cabinet who you think will play well on the global stage.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...