Jump to content

Recommended Posts

image.thumb.jpeg.6a8a5d896ebea52523d366cf545bed3e.jpeg

Don’t know how people feel about this proposed zone but the leaflet doesn’t give any option in their “resident survey” to oppose the plans. Which I feel is pretty poor show. I’ve written to the councillors Renata Hamvas and Victoria Mills about this. If anyone else feels the same please can you write also. 
 

Consultation here 

https://consultations.southwark.gov.uk/environment-leisure/nunheadcpz2022/

Absolutely nowhere to object to the proposal which IMHO makes it a flawed consultation and open to challenges.

OObviously part of the master plan to nibble away at parking provisions until there is no areas without a CPZ regardless if its needed or not. 

Change org link also added 

https://chng.it/c4TPPyfgZd

Edited by Spartacus
Added change org

 

If you are against this planned implementation of parking restrictions please use the following email to object at [email protected]  cc [email protected]

 

Dear sir/madam,

I am writing to express my concerns about the proposal for parking-controlled zones in Nunhead. As a resident of this area, I believe that this measure seems unnecessary and inconvenient. It will only add to the financial burden of residents who are already experiencing a cost-of-living crisis.

While I understand the importance of regulating parking in busy areas, I don't believe it is difficult in our area. Moreover, the introduction of parking permits can make things worse for locals. This is especially true when considering the risk of hefty fines for parking in the wrong area. I feel that there should be a more equitable solution that doesn't unfairly penalise residents who are just trying to go about their daily lives.

It's unfortunate that the introduction of these zones was decided without first seeking residents' input through a biased questionnaire, which did not ask the question of whether residents wanted the introduction of controlled parking zones in Nunhead. I think the Southwark Council need to reissue this questionnaire to the residents of Nunhead asking if they wish for this measure to be taken.

I hope that you will take my concerns into consideration and work to find a solution that benefits everyone in the community.

Yours faithfully,

Edited by shygalroo1
  • 3 weeks later...

Southwark do what they want. So called consultation is a waste of time.  Don't forget that Southwark have their own so called green targets to meet and enforced parking restrictions can be used to meet a percentage of these. Along with Bill and Ben flower pot men closing roads and signs being set back it is a money making scheme. Money is the only reason for this. 

It will cost each resident £225 a year to park their car in the street as opposed to nothing at the moment. Who would want that except the fake resident that Southwark Council mentions in their leaflet perhaps? They have not conducted a true consultation exercise or even a survey to determine what people think. In short, just lies and propaganda to get their way and force people to pay for something that is not necessary or desired.

That sounds pretty reasonable cost to me.  I am sure the money will be well spent on local services.  From my calculation the average motorist is saving far more than this with fuel duty frozen for the last 17 years, and being reduced (in theory temporarily) by the current government.  So cheer up motorists.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • No, signs of sense and scrutiny of "leaders" not knowing the impact of what they have done, so much so that every citizen in the UK will suffer financially as a result of an incompetent, incoherent, unhinged Govt that's impact is effecting every citizen in the UK. Where things were being turned around by the last lot, this lot has already compromised all that work in its first 120 days in power. You may not like it but that's the truth.  We are never going to agree and actually Reeves, Rayner and Starmer need to go, like yesterday. 
    • Worse than gb news   Signs of unhinged minds 
    • This is why you are not the chancellor! Rachel Reeves won't be going anywhere until either she fixes things or Starmer needs someone to blame!
    • I fully agree. I hope you had some khinkali (Georgian dumplings), they're fantastic! They used to have only meat ones but now they also have mushroom ones and they're great. I always try to fit in a honey cake at dessert. Overall I appreciate that their food and menu seems to only improve with time.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...