Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Southwark council have increased their parking permit fees to extortionate prices .

I pay a parking permit for somebody and it has gone from £38 for 3 months to £ 64.60 or for 1 month it is now £27.90 , and this is for ulez complient vehicles non complient are even dearer for 1 month £31.60 and for 3 months £81 , I emailed southwark and they said it was to reduce the amount of vehicles in southwark , I dont believe they should dictate on how many people drive vehicles in southwark after all this is a free counter where we choose to drive walk or cycle 

Wear Jean's or trousers or a dress or skirt eat a bag of crisps or a chocolate but they are trying to force change on the motorists of southwark ...  I have included a screenshot of the reply from southwark council 

Screenshot_20230426-153758_Email.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/325622-parking-permit-price-increase/
Share on other sites

Quote

and they said it was to reduce the amount of vehicles in southwark

I have for some time been saying (from their own statements) that it is part of the Labour Party's policy in Southwark to drive out privately owned cars from the borough. All their actions (LTNs etc; spreading CPZs) have been in aid of this. Only excluding traffic from outside schools at start and finish of the school day can be seen as having another reason (safety) and I'm sure its contribution to the anti-private vehicle policy will have helped councillors make decisions in this area too.  When they introduced CPZs into Dulwich it was always clear that once they had sufficient weight they would whack up the charges as far as they could - to punish us for having the temerity of being able to afford cars and choosing not to live in an area with comparatively poor public transport (compared at least to the north of the borough). This is NOT about air quality (and never was), it is about social engineering. And punishing the Kulaks.

  • Like 1
2 minutes ago, CPR Dave said:

One of the cyclists will be along in a moment to tell you that there is no war on motorists and Southwark have never said they want to end private car ownership in the Borough.

 

Can we open a book on which one it will be to comment first ? 

I agree penguin68 totally that its nothing to do with air quality it's too do with money .... 

Not sure how the government and councils and the worst mayor ever can expect the people of Britain to solve the pollution for the entire world it's no good demanding and forcing us to do the impossible 

2 hours ago, Penguin68 said:

And punishing the Kulaks.

Yes, an increase in parking permit fees is exactly like being a victim of Stalinist terror. It must be awful to live in fear of starvation or summary execution by roving Conway gangs. Everyone keeps talking about commemorating the Holodomor, but where's the memorial for you?

  • 7 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm certainly not surly - it's Friday, so I'm in a delightful mood.  As Earl Aelfheah said, the money has to come from somewhere. But Labour new that hiking fuel as well as employee NIC in would be a step too far - for businesses and consumers. It was the right decision for this moment in time. Suggesting that someone who's against fuel duty increase on this occasion is against and fuel duty full stop is quite a leap. Why do you demonise everyone who doesn't think that owning a car is a cardinal sin?  I'm not sure using Clarkson as an example of your average farmer holds much weight as an argument, but you know that already, Mal. 
    • Hope it's making others smile too! I don't know the background or how long it's been there 😊
    • If you are against the increase in fuel duty then you are surly against fuel duty full stop.  It has not kept up with inflation, I'm talking about getting it back on track.  Ultimately road user charging is the solution. Labour will probably compromise on agricultural land inheritance by raising the cap so it generally catches the Clarksons of the world who are not bothered about profits from land beyond, in his case, income from a highly successful TV series and the great publicity for the farm shop and pub
    • Were things much simpler in the 80/90s? I remember both my girls belonging to a 6th Form Consortium which covered Sydenham Girls, Forest Hill Boys and Sedgehill off Bromley Road. A level classes were spread across the 3 schools - i remember Forest Hill boys coming to Sydenham Girls for one subject (think it was sociology or psychology ) A mini bus was provided to transport pupils to different sites, But I guess with less schools being 'managed' by the local authority, providers such as Harris etc have different priorities. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...