Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just thought I'd share this appalling account of extreme cycle hatred that sums up why I want to challenge some motorists' sense of entitlement and prejudice towards cyclists whenever I get the chance:


http://road.cc/content/news/84212-norwich-police-seek-driver-who-tweeted-about-collision-cyclist

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/32457-dangerous-drivers/
Share on other sites

LadyDeliah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dick cyclists are annoying, dick motorists are

> dangerous.


Just because they are not travelling at 'speed' does not mean that they can not be a danger to themselves and others.


ETA: I am not anti cycling - I would LOVE to cycle to work but do not feel confident enough to for the exact reason I just stated above.

Oh Come on LD, just because a bike isn't a car, an idiot on a bike can still hurt people pretty bad if they hit them at speed, and more to the point, they can cause accidents.


I'm not a motorist or a regular cyclist, but as a pedestrian, I've come closer to being hit by cyclists than cars on a number of occasions (usually when they're going around stationary vehicles at top speed).


This is like people slagging off all mothers with buggies just because a few are selfish idiots.

I think cyclists should be banned from dangerous inner city trunk roads. LL is a prime example. Buses, lorries, vans and cars all competing in a small space with pedestrians crossing sometimes without due care and attention. Cyclists just add to this pressure, so how about putting cycle routes along back roads and banning them from bigger roads. Just a thought.


Louisa.

It's the hatred of cyclists by motorists that is what worries me.


The incident in the first article is a hate crime by a stupid woman using her car as a weapon against a cyclist in my opinion and it is this kind of dangerous attitude to cyclists that I want people to question.


I am going to invest in a helmet cam to report the dangerous drivers I encounter everyday and the abuse I receive when I try to pull them up for endangering my life.


Why should motorists be allowed to get away with this kind of behaviour on a daily basis without it being challenged?

But it works both ways LD......look at this case for example......


http://www.cravenherald.co.uk/news/10349601.Cyclist_found_guilty_of_assaulting_van_driver/?ref=rss


People lose their tempers on both sides.


You are not the police. If you choose to challenge every driver you feel isn't driving to a standard you set, then you are putting yourself at risk of being abused and will find little sympathy from the Police, unless the driver has caused an actual accident (and failed to stop) of course. As a lawyer you should know this.

Just to lighten proceedings a little heres a joke I found.


The other day on a ride, I was speeding down a narrow, twisting, mountain road. Then along comes a man who was driving very slowly uphill toward me, honking his horn and shouting at me.


"PIG! PIG!!" he yelled. "PIG! PIG!!"


So I flipped him the finger and shouted back some things I dare not repeat as I buzzed by him.


Still thinking about this awful man and his shouting, I turned the corner and promptly collided with a pig.


Louisa.

DJKillaQueen Wrote:


>

> You are not the police. If you choose to challenge

> every driver you feel isn't driving to a standard

> you set, then you are putting yourself at risk of

> being abused and will find little sympathy from

> the Police, unless the driver has caused an actual

> accident (and failed to stop) of course. As a

> lawyer you should know this.



Actually that is not correct. If you see someone commit an offence you have the right to make a citizen's arrest. This is what security guards' and other non-police arrests are based on.


If someone is committing the offence of dangerous driving, putting my life in danger, I have the right to challenge them.

And because I know none of the law abiding EDF motorists want to breach the Highway Code, I thought I'd post this so you know what you are expected to do when overtaking a cyclist:



The Highway Code Rule 163 states that you should


Overtake only when it is safe and legal to do so

not get too close to the vehicle you intend to overtake

use your mirrors, signal when it is safe to do so, take a quick sideways glance if necessary into the blind spot area and then start to move out

not assume that you can simply follow a vehicle ahead which is overtaking; there may only be enough room for one vehicle

move quickly past the vehicle you are overtaking, once you have started to overtake. Allow plenty of room. Move back to the left as soon as you can but do not cut in

take extra care at night and in poor visibility when it is harder to judge speed and distance

give way to oncoming vehicles before passing parked vehicles or other obstructions on your side of the road

only overtake on the left if the vehicle in front is signalling to turn right, and there is room to do so

stay in your lane if traffic is moving slowly in queues. If the queue on your right is moving more slowly than you are, you may pass on the left

give motorcyclists, cyclists and horse riders at least as much room as you would when overtaking a car (see Rules 211-215)

More help for all you caring motorists, listed under the section Vulnerable Road Users along with horse riders:


211

It is often difficult to see motorcyclists and cyclists, especially when they are coming up from behind, coming out of junctions, at roundabouts, overtaking you or filtering through traffic. Always look out for them before you emerge from a junction; they could be approaching faster than you think. When turning right across a line of slow-moving or stationary traffic, look out for cyclists or motorcyclists on the inside of the traffic you are crossing. Be especially careful when turning, and when changing direction or lane. Be sure to check mirrors and blind spots carefully.

212

When passing motorcyclists and cyclists, give them plenty of room (see Rules 162 to 167). If they look over their shoulder it could mean that they intend to pull out, turn right or change direction. Give them time and space to do so.

213

Motorcyclists and cyclists may suddenly need to avoid uneven road surfaces and obstacles such as drain covers or oily, wet or icy patches on the road. Give them plenty of room and pay particular attention to any sudden change of direction they may have to make.

LD, having actually read your two links, I am shocked by the attitudes towards cyclists that are expressed there. The first one, a stupid woman was prepared to injure a human being and then boast about it on twitter, the second a mad old judge is not prepared to give a proper sentence to someone who killed a granny who was on a bike.

Unbelievable!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • hallo, Do you have a suitcase for a student going to Ghana to teach sports? Taking a parachute, cones, mini hurdles, batons and dodge balls and a pump, then leaving it there for the school If I could have any old suitcase please it would be amazing! Thank you
    • Looking to borrow a gazebo for birthday party this Saturday, can you help? Julian - 07961463111
    • Whilst I agree, I have been thinking about this recently in relation to some of the other posts on here about anti social behaviour. We are all products of our upbringing - our experiences at home, school and beyond - plus whatever we have inherited genetically which might affect our behaviour (the nature/nurture thing). So in this case, if people haven't been brought up to love and appreciate trees and other wild things, plus as you say they may be deeply unhappy (or have other undiagnosed issues) it's easy to see how they could have ended up doing this. Also, it's possible they had quite low intelligence and didn't really grasp what they were doing and the effect it would have on so many other people. But that's just surmise and possibly completely wrong. From what I've read about it, they seemed to be two mates egging each other on, like two big kids. I'm not for a minute excusing what they did, and it's right they should be punished, but I really hope they might get some sort of rehabilitation in prison (it would  be appropriate to have them do some kind of community service like planting saplings, wouldn't it, or working in woodland conservation). And the same goes for phone robbers and shoplifters (rehabilitation, not planting saplings), though for SOME  shoplifters there might also be other issues at play, not excluding poverty. Sorry Jasonlondon,  I've gone off at a real tangent here, lucky it's in the lounge! Oh oops I've just noticed it isn't. Sorry admin. Oh, and then there's a whole philosophical discussion to be had about free will and determinism ..... 🤣🤣🤣
    • Thanks! I'll find out in a few weeks when I get the results! It was one of those disconcerting things where a disembodied voice keeps booming  at you to breathe in and hold it, then breathe normally. Apart from that it was OK, all completely painless. I imagine there will be quite a few people going from ED, though I presume it covers the whole Southwark area 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...