Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The new pedestrian zone affecting Adys Road, Ondine Road and Amott Road is probably about to launch as signage is being installed today.


I see these are going to use "APNR" cameras, so everyone's number plate can be tracked going into the zone, and presumably fines will be issued automatically.


Anyone have experience about how good this enforcement is and what a difference it makes?


Consultation with map: https://consultations.southwark.gov.uk/environment-leisure/st-johns-and-st-clements-primary-school-street/

Fs3VnO9WYAMVxa6.jpeg.60f5dd880418409333c350c5364f701b.jpeg

I think the positioning of the closure on Adys Rd is going to cause chaos, with traffic in both directions having no avenue for escape by the time the signs are visible. People turning left out of Nutbrook onto Adys will be particularly stuck.


I’m supportive of the scheme, as Adys is used as a rat run for commercial vehicles and there are often angry confrontations between motorists and pedestrians around the school, but I think the positioning of the signage could be improved.

Just to point out to residents, you will need to add an SC7 school street parking permit to your usual parking permit. This is issued for 12 months and doesn't cost anything.


Click on parking permit on Southwark website and it is on drop-down menu.

One of the problems with this is that Ady's road is the main access out of the area as you cannot exit through Ondine, Copleston or Oglander. Imagine the cars trying to turn right at the bottom of the park by the church - in both directions - as well as problems at the Amott road end. Fiasco!

Froglamder, from what I can glean from the Southwark website it tends to be an hour-ish each morning and afternoon anytime between 8-9.30 and 2.30-4.30.


It also says that it's expected to be implemented in autumn 2023, but that doesn't seem to chime with the signs being in place already.


I'd agree with Soylent & Alec. You can't argue with the safety aspect of it, but it's going to make getting from East Dulwich Road to Bellenden Road pretty convoluted and chaotic.

What time(s) is this in effect from and what roads get an exemption if you live in them? I didn’t know anything about this!

 

You have to live within the restriction (ie on Adys roughly between Ondine and Amott or a short distance down either of those roads). There are also exemptions for registered carers of people living in those houses and for parents on children with mobility needs who go to SJSC. We’re further up Adys and so now cannot drive south during the period of operation.

We received a letter about the Adys Rd closure yesterday. Hours of operation will be 8:30-9:15 and 3-3:45 during term time. Warning notices will be issued to motorists for the 17th April and Penalty Charge Notices will be issued from the 9th May. 

  • Thanks 1
On 12/04/2023 at 07:34, alex_b said:

We received a letter about the Adys Rd closure yesterday. Hours of operation will be 8:30-9:15 and 3-3:45 during term time. Warning notices will be issued to motorists for the 17th April and Penalty Charge Notices will be issued from the 9th May. 

However the signs don'make no mention of 'operating during term time' and I suspect this will be implemented throughout the summer and other holidays as well.

Cars turning left into Adys from Nutbrook- including huge lorries that use the route- once they see the sign, won't be able to escape via Gowlett Road as that section is also in the zone. Cars coming into Adys from the South and then seeing the sign will have to divert down the  very narrow  section of East Dulwich Road that runs by the church

It's going to be absolute carnage. All the traffic that comes down Crystal Palace Road to avoid the logjam on Lordship Lane is going to find itself completely screwed. No right turn on East Dulwich Road, no option to go straight jn and the section down to the roundabout is going to be even more grid locked than usual. 

Once people are inside the West Peckham CPZ area they will be trapped having to head back to Nigel Road to get out if they don't want a fine. 

They needed to change some of them there restrictions to eas pressure. 

This scheme is as gormless as all the others the council have come up with recently.

  • Like 1
4 hours ago, Huggers said:

However the signs don'make no mention of 'operating during term time' and I suspect this will be implemented throughout the summer and other holidays as well.

Cars turning left into Adys from Nutbrook- including huge lorries that use the route- once they see the sign, won't be able to escape via Gowlett Road as that section is also in the zone. Cars coming into Adys from the South and then seeing the sign will have to divert down the  very narrow  section of East Dulwich Road that runs by the church

Well the TMO states term time only as does the Southwark schools streets page. I’m generally fairly down on Southwark but I doubt they’d do something so cynically unlawful. 
 

I agree the closures are badly placed and will trap traffic. In the consultation and directly to the highways team (copying my local councillors) I suggested bringing the closure back to the corner of Nutbrook or at least advanced warning signs further up Adys and Nutbrook. Unfortunately I was ignored. 

I don’t think Amott/Gowlett will be that affected as alternate routes (the western end of Amott is closed by this). I think Fenwick is likely to bear the brunt of traffic. Southwark really should close the Bellenden rat-run to through traffic and keep commercial and HGVs on the A roads. 

Why should Southwark bother to close Bellenden Road. They seem to dig it up every other week which does the job.

but if  you are silly enough to pay around 1 milllion for a 2 up 2 down you need some consideration 

 

 

 

Edited by richard tudor
To Broad a comment
1 hour ago, alex_b said:

I don’t think Amott/Gowlett will be that affected as alternate routes (the western end of Amott is closed by this). I think Fenwick is likely to bear the brunt of traffic. Southwark really should close the Bellenden rat-run to through traffic and keep commercial and HGVs on the A roads. 

yes lets really finish off the shops and businesses

 

12 minutes ago, Huggers said:

yes lets really finish off the shops and businesses

That wasn’t what I said. I said close the rat run especially for commercial traffic, HGVs and coaches. You could still retain access without having residential roads with three schools on them being subject to dangerous traffic. The fact the bollard at the corner of Nutbrook and Adys gets knocked over on a weekly basis shows that vehicles are using these streets that cannot safely navigate them without driving across pavements. 

  • Like 1

but how would they differentiate between users? We have always thought there should be a sign at top of Lyndurst Way discouraging HGV's and coaches with a weight limit. We regularly have articulated lorries trying to negotiate the Maxted Road/Nutbrook Street corner. 

As for the bollard on our corner- it is too low for a lot of vehicles to see until it is too late. 

  • 1 month later...
On 17/04/2023 at 13:29, Huggers said:

but how would they differentiate between users? We have always thought there should be a sign at top of Lyndurst Way discouraging HGV's and coaches with a weight limit. We regularly have articulated lorries trying to negotiate the Maxted Road/Nutbrook Street corner. 

As for the bollard on our corner- it is too low for a lot of vehicles to see until it is too late. 

Too late for what? To late to avoid driving on the pavement?

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
  • 1 month later...

Road seems a bit quieter, not too much craziness in the morning that I’ve noticed. Some people doing awkward turns or long reverses at the signs. A fair number of people driving straight through.
 

Unfortunately the Adys/Nutbrook bollard still gets taken out within days of being repaired. 

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have been using Andy for many years for decorating and general handyman duties. He always does a great job, is very friendly and his prices are competitive. Highly recommend.
    • Money has to be raised in order to slow the almost terminal decline of public services bought on through years of neglect under the last government. There is no way to raise taxes that does not have some negative impacts / trade offs. But if we want public services and infrastructure that work then raise taxes we must.  Personally I'm glad that she is has gone some way to narrowing the inheritance loop hole which was being used by rich individuals (who are not farmers) to avoid tax. She's slightly rebalanced the burden away from the young, putting it more on wealthier pensioners (who let's face it, have been disproportionately protected for many, many years). And the NICs increase, whilst undoubtedly inflationary, won't be directly passed on (some will, some will likely be absorbed by companies); it's better than raising it on employees, which would have done more to depress growth. Overall, I think she's sailed a prudent course through very choppy waters. The electorate needs to get serious... you can't have European style services and US levels of tax. Borrowing for tax cuts, Truss style, it is is not. Of course the elephant in the room (growing ever larger now Trump is in office and threatening tariffs) is our relationship with the EU. If we want better growth, we need a closer relationship with our nearest and largest trading block. We will at some point have to review tax on transport more radically (as we see greater up take of electric vehicles). The most economically rational system would be one of dynamic road pricing. But politically, very difficult to do
    • Labour was right not to increase fuel duty - it's not just motorists it affects, but goods transport. Fuel goes up, inflation goes up. Inflation will go up now anyway, and growth will stagnate, because businesses will pass the employee NIC hikes onto customers.  I think farms should be exempt from the 20% IHT. I don't know any rich famers, only ones who work their fingers to the bone. But it's in their blood and taking that, often multi-generation, legacy out of the family is heart-breaking. Many work to such low yields, and yet they'll often still bring a lamb to the vet, even if the fees are more than the lamb's life (or death) is worth. Food security should be made a top priority in this country. And, even tho the tax is only for farms over £1m, that's probably not much when you add it all up. I think every incentive should be given to young people who want to take up the mantle. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...