Jump to content

Joie baby i-level recline car seat - £50


Recommended Posts

Hi,

Brilliant car seat available for baby up to 2 years old. It reclines and is very comfortable making long car journeys very smooth. The seat can sit up or recline in a lying down position. We have done 8 hour long journeys with this car seat and baby was very comfy.

 

Further info on the joie website : https://joiebaby.com/uk/signature-i-level-lay-flat-car-seat#color=24

 

Bought it for £275

New RPR is : £195

Selling for £50.

 

Isofix only (isofix is attached to the baby car seat).

 

Bought last year, this car seat has not been in any accidents.

 

Pick up near East Dulwich station.

IMG_6131.thumb.JPG.5e78912438347b7100ca361cb535cde6.JPG

IMG_6132.JPG.20547a305d31de2f4f31dea5d6c4b36c.JPG

  • lyds2019 changed the title to Joie baby i-level recline car seat - £90
  • lyds2019 changed the title to Joie baby i-level recline car seat - £50

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • in reply to my own "Where did you get this from?" response to your post at https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/353788-is-rachel-reeves-becoming-the-new-liz-truss/?do=findComment&comment=1688310, in which you again spoke of the government's "doubling the national debt". You seem not to understand the meaning of "national debt".  Have you perhaps been relying on someone else's usage? I'm sorry to hear of Starmer's decimation.
    • PetitionCall a General Election I would like there to be another General Election. I believe the current Labour Government have gone back on the promises they laid out in the lead up to the last election. Sign this petition 2,500,822 signatures 2,501,025 signatures
    • Keys now back with rightful owner.
    • in response to   On 19/11/2024 at 08:36, Moovart said: I know nothing about farming so can't really comment but when I read things like this interesting thread from Guy Shrubsole I am increasingly cynical about those making the loudest noise.  And yes it is a genuine link.   I've just had a look at the page source.  It contains a link to a Twitter page that's been automatically embedded in Moovart's post but seems not now operative. So I've dug out the url to have another try, this time without embedding:  https://x.com/guyshrubsole/status/1858490339356533018 .  Seems ok.   in reply to my own "Where did you get this from?" response to your post at https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/353788-is-rachel-reeves-becoming-the-new-liz-truss/?do=findComment&comment=1688310, in which you again spoke of the government's "doubling the national debt". You seem not to understand the meaning of "national debt".  Might you have been copying someone else's usage? I'm sorry to hear of Starmer's decimation. ================ And the para below was originally a totally new separate post but has also been merged.  Good night forum. The above merging of my posts in response to Sue and to Jazzer have been done by the forum system, so there's no point in my trying again to separate them.  I've already tried editing out the merging and reposting the one to jazzer, but ended up with the same forced merge.  Apologies. Latest edit.  The moral seems to be: don't try making two consecutive posts or they'll be liable to merging.  I've now been able to post a freestanding reply to jazzer's post now that there's an intervening post.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...