Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Whilst their appointment system leaves me cold, I have always found the receptionists extremely helpful and accommodating. I recently wanted to make a non-urgent appt for a particular day of the week and their diary hadn't been opened up far enough to schedule it. The receptionist made a note of my request and called me the day the diary was extended, so I didn't miss the slot.
I managed to get a same day appointment last Monday - I had to ring for about 10 minutes but got an afternoon appointment, as requested. I have seen the doctor (Dr Wong?) a few times and he is very thorough and doesn't rush you through the appointment. I do get frustrated by the engaged phone and the fact I generally have to get a same day appointment rather than being able to book a non-urgent one but overall the care I have had from the surgery since it opened has been good. I should add that I have had been to the surgery for a range of illnesses - and a few health scares - over the years so I have been a fairly regular customer.
I find their relationship with Lloyds on express prescriptions quite flawed. Almost every time I go to pick up a prescription it is late or has gone missing, with both sides blaming each other (i.e. DMC saying it was filled and picked up by Lloyds, and Lloyds claiming it hadn't been done by DMC). I'm quite sick of it. I've also never been told about the onsite pharmacy which is a bit annoying as on several occasions (due to their cock up) I've had children and myself run out of important medication. Infuriating. Agree there are a couple of nice receptionists and individual doctors but the overall system isn't working, for us anyway.
Yes Belle I too have had no end of problems with the dmc-lloyds process. To the point where it has had me reduced to tears. The final drop was when the pharmacist accused me of telling fibs..I have now cancelled it (and made a formal complaint)and have set up the same service with sainsburys pharmacy and so far I cant fault them. Not one hiccup so far. Worth a try?

I have an automatic repeat prescription with DMC-Lloyds and have had no problems at all with it.


Just picked it up at Lloyds yesterday in fact, and it was there on the day specified two months ago.


Must admit I did once have an issue (with different medication) when DMC were blaming Lloyds and vice versa, but that was a long time ago and was a one-off.

I also never get my prescriptions sent to lloyds any more, I had 3 issues, found DMC to be helpful and lloyds pretty awful.


The time that made me give up on them was them not having my (very common) medication in stock - apparently they had stopped stocking it. I always pick up my repeats and go to either of the ones on lordship lane now.


Re DMC, I also find it shocking that its so hard to get an appt unless you wait 3 weeks but having said that when I have needed a doctor quickly for my son they have been really good at squeezing us in.

It's a shiny APMS (private provider) building, but other than one excellent doctor, my experiences there (and my girlfriend's) were always pretty terrible. Doctors that are embarrased by human bodies, shocking failure to understand very simple issues (demonstrated when I got to the physio and heard what had been written on the referral) and an appaling appointments system. I work for the British Medical Association so I understand how these things work - this practice will get paid (in broad terms) based on the number of patients on their list - hence why they clearly have way too many registered patients and it is so difficult to get an appointment.

1983groke

I am a physio and tbh irrelevant of the Drs level of knowledge ie GP / reg/cons what they write on physio referrals is terrible! Lazy? Or just lack of respect for the knowledge of other healthcare professionals? Not sure...

However you are correct about GP contracts... Though I believe another problem with the contracts are that they can't close their lists for short periods. Meant to stop them declining patients that they didn't want but they had minimal time periods they could close for. This has had the unintented effect that thy don't close them at all and end up oversubscribed. They daren't close them in case their numbers go down too far. They are at fault because they may be following the contract but not the moral and ethical duty they have.

My experiences are varied. In the past excellent, cause for complaint due to not investigating a condition the doctor himself suggested that I had and more recently poor / non existent appts. I'm very capable of getting what I need, but being an articulate middle class forceful individual should NOT be the way to get basic healthcare.

I think I may try another chemist then, though longer term will probably switch GPs anyway. I've had prescriptions which weren't on the express system with Lloyds but which still haven't been done (i.e. it was DMC's fault) - despite having allowed more than the minimum 48 hours etc, and that's just inexcusable. Once, ok - but 3 or 4 times in as many months is ridiculous. In fairness, my husband sent a complaint in and got a very swift and detailed response from the practise manager. Like you midivydale I've been on the brink of tears at times, it's extremely stressful not being able to get medication you know your child needs, especially when you have jumped through all the appropriate hoops.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Good advice Kipper!  The 1.0 early Ecoboost and 1.2 Puretech engines have wet cam belts that fail and failure with a cam belt invariably result in catastrophic  damage to valves and pistons. Later ones were changed to chains. Avoid at all costs!
    • Sorry. Link wasn't working on my phone, but it is now, and I couldn't delete the post.
    • Sent you a pm
    • I think there's a fair number of "participating" sub offices that do passports or, at least, play the "check and send" game (£16 for glancing at your form), so some degree of cherry-picking seems to be permitted. Though it does look as if Post Offices "Indentity Services" are where it things the future lies, and "Right to Rent" (though it's more an eligibility check) looks a bit of an earner, along with DBS checks and the Age Verification services that, if the government gets its way, we'll all need to subscribe to before we're allowed on mumsnet. Those services, incidentally, seem mostly outsourced to an outfit called "Yoti", a privately-owned, loss-making "identity platform" with debts of £150m, a tardy approach to filings, and a finger in a bunch of questionable pies ("Passive Facial Liveness Recognition" sounds gloriously sinister) so what the Post Office gets out of the arrangement isn't clear, but I'm sure they think it worthwhile. That said, they once thought the same of funeral plans which, for some peculiar reason, failed to set fire to the shuffling queues, even metaphorically. For most, it seems, Post Office work is mostly a dead loss, and even the parcel-juggling is more nuisance than blessing. As a nonchalant retailer of other people's services the organisation can only survive now on the back of subsidies, and we're not even sure what they are. The taxpayer-funded subsidies from government (a £136m hand-out to keep Horizon going, £1bn for its compensation scheme, around £50m for the network, and perhaps a loan or two) are clearish, but the cross-subsidies provided by other retail activities in branches are murkier. As are the "phantom shortfalls" created by the Horizon system, which secretly lined Post Office's coffers as postmasters balanced the books with contributions from their own pockets. Those never showed up in the accounts though - because Horizon *was* the accounting system - so we can't tell how much of a subsidy that was. We might get an idea of the scale, however, from Post Office's belated Horizon Shortfall Scheme, which is handing £75k to every branch that's complained, though it's anyone's guess if that's fair or not. Still, that's all supposed to be behind us now, and Post Office's CEO-of-the-week recently promised an "extra" £250m a year for the branches (roughly enough to cover a minimum wage worker in each), which might make it worth the candle for some. Though he didn't expect that would happen before 2030 (we can only wonder when his pension will mature) and then it'd be "subject to government funding", so it might have to be a very short candle as it doesn't look like a promise that he can make. Still, I wouldn't want to discourage anyone from applying for a franchise, and it's possible that, this time, Post Office will be telling the truth. And, you never know, we might all be back in the Post Office soon, and eagerly buying stamps, if only for existence permits, rather than for our letters.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...