Jump to content

Recommended Posts

That's because Southwark council don't collect your garden waste. 

On 01/12/2023 at 07:46, legalalien said:

Just reading through the proposed council income stream adjustments in the budget going to next week’s Cabinet meeting.

They are struggling to balance the budget.

Looks like garden waste charges are going up to £80 next year if approved.

 

https://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/documents/s117577/Appendix C Income.pdf

£40 in 2022 to £80 next year.

Think I'll just get a bigger green bin amd putthe garden waste in there.

Leaves from council trees that they don't bother sweeping will get dumped in the middle of their road.

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

It begs the question................... what unnecessary expenditures and/or useless projects is Southwark spending  money on that necessitates such a massive hike ?

One such that springs to mind and that is the so-called "Dulwich Square" where it paid performers to "entertain" the well-heeled  local residents of DV.
Any others that get your goat?

3 hours ago, CPR Dave said:

 

Leaves from council trees that they don't bother sweeping will get dumped in the middle of their road.

 

But they would have to sweep them every day at this time of year!

The council swept Ulverscroft Road leaves, put them in bags and collected them - but now, obviously, a load more leaves which have fallen since are lying on the pavement.

I think it's somewhat unfair to say they "don't bother" sweeping them, unless you have evidence of that.

 

2 hours ago, vladi said:

It begs the question................... what unnecessary expenditures and/or useless projects is Southwark spending  money on that necessitates such a massive hike ?

One such that springs to mind and that is the so-called "Dulwich Square" where it paid performers to "entertain" the well-heeled  local residents of DV.
Any others that get your goat?

Hi Vladi,

What proof do you have that the council paid the performers?

12 hours ago, personannrose said:

Hi Vladi,

What proof do you have that the council paid the performers?

Proof is in the form of a response to my FOI request to Southwark in 2021. Their reply was as follows:-
 

Thank you for your request for information that was received on 13 September 2021 in which you requested:

The following performances have taken place at "Dulwich Square" that have been funded by the Council. These were
Saturday, 14 Aug, 12 noon -Sarah Moule and band
Saturday, 21 August, 12 noon - Peter Black: Virtuoso Guitarist
Saturday, 21 August, 1pm ish - Calton String Quintet
Saturday, 28 August, 12 noon - Mazaika Gypsy Duo
Saturday, 28 August, 1pm ish - Trombone Jerome and the Homies
Saturday, 4 September, 12 noon - GDS Unlimited
My request is for the funding that Southwark provided for each of those events and which should be inclusive all costs including the following
a) Fees paid to the performers
b) Fees for installation and provision of sound amplification equipment
c) Fees for installation and provision of the canvas pergola

We can confirm that this group was awarded £3000 from the Neighbourhoods Fund in the South multi ward area.

The only expenditure breakdown that is available, relates to budgeted costs that the group provide when they applied (table below).

Item of expenditure

Breakdown of Costs

Insurance & Marketing

£   350

Staging & Sound

£   900         

Acts/Performers

£1,750

Total

£3,000

 
 

If you have any queries or concerns then please contact us using the above details.

 

Further information is available through the Information Commissioner at www.ico.org.uk.

Yours sincerely

 

Jamie Corner
Information Systems Officer

  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 1
  • 1 month later...
20 hours ago, dulwich1955 said:

southwark council is Ripping off the Residents of southwark

The accounts are open annually to inspection for  a month at the time of the annual audit, usually in the summer --
  a good opportunity to collect and publish your evidence.  https://www.southwark.gov.uk/council-and-democracy/key-documents/statement-of-accounts

  • 2 weeks later...

Interesting to see, that despite Southwark claiming they have had to cut services year on year due to austerity impacting their budget, the number of full time employees has risen each year which adds to their wage bill. 

Any business that faces reduced income cuts their cloth (and staff numbers) appropriately.

Source https://www.southwark.gov.uk/council-and-democracy/equality-and-diversity/employment-and-equalities

you have to download each PDF and look through them for employee numbers. 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I remember halfpennies. Farthings had gone by my time. 2/6 (half a crown) that looked very similar to 2s.  
    • Looks like moths have been at it!
    • "They sold everyone, directly or indirectly, on the notion that Covid, the energy crisis and the war in Ukraine had nothing to do with the sorry state of the UK and that it was 14 years of Tory rule and Truss' nightmare budget that was the source of all the country's woes. " This simply isn't true. Global issues all play their own parts (as they do with other countries) but the UK govt had  been especially abject for years. Improvements could not be made with them in power. That's not to say everything is all roses when they go To claim parties shouldn't try and sell themselves in an election is absurd - but if labour did overpromise or dig into specifics (which they partly couldn't because they didn't have their hands on the books) then we live in a country where a population and media is happy to punch on them and relect the shabby last govt I mean if any argument I made was supported by some posters I would rethink it but thats just me
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...