Mal, why is it when EA said let's not make this political, that your only response is a puerile insult about someone being right wing? On what basis is The Times (in which the recently deceased Andrew Norfolk risked everything to expose the story), alarmist? And all the other mainstream newspapers - this isn't some conspiracy story lurking in a dark corner of the web. Perhaps I know so much about it because my google and AI profiles offer up balanced reportage from respected journalists across the spectrum.
I'm curious to know why you dismiss anyone who supports the investigation of police and local authorities who, not only failed to protect vulnerable young women, but actually criminalised them. You seem uncomfortable with the idea of accepting the reality - is because your beloved councils will come under greater scrutiny?
An article worth reading by the alarmist and raging right wing journalist Pippa Crerar
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2025/jun/16/grooming-gangs-in-uk-thrived-in-culture-of-ignorance-casey-report-says
https://responsiblestatecraft.org/iran-nuclear-deal/
Useful article on how Trump withdrawing from the Iran nukes deal helped lead to the current situation.
And a 2018 article from Beeb
Can't reverse history but why has the world forgotten Trump version 1 dreadful decision
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-43902372.amp
I expect my Google and AI profile is different to yours. Mine probably avoids the alarmist and right wing articles.
I do occasionally flick through an old copy of the Daily Mail when at the hairdressers and surprised at all the dreadful things that go on, that never comes to my attention.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now