Jump to content

Recommended Posts

furryjumpergirl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Whatever its cultural background, I find it hard

> to separate the symbol from the movement it's most

> famous for. Having a swastika positioned at the

> entrance to my street at the moment is horrible.

> Walking past it is horrible. Wondering whether

> cars driving past assume my lovely street is now a

> Nazi /Neo-Nazi stronghold is horrible!



somehow i doubt it.

Those who doubt that fascism is alive and well in 21st century Britain only needs to check their voter's card today.


If the BNP get 5% of the vote (and they came v close before) they automatically get a seat on the London Assembly. I doubt if the timing of this graffiti is coincidental.

It would be nice if some group or other would adopt the swastika as a sign of something positive almost relaunch it, in order to take it away from neo-nazi / stupid bast@rd types.


Would be a bit like "Buddy Christ" in the film Dogma, it's all about the marketing!


http://blog.osministry.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/lol_buddy_jesus.jpg

*Bob* I've edited my original post; I said that the symbol was used by the nazi party without going on to say that it has subsequently been adopted by neo-nazi organisations. I realsie this was inacurate (a sloppy oversight, my apologies) and have changed it.

I hope this avoids detention as I have dinner plans tonight.


With that small correction, however, I stand by my original post. I am also not asking people to take to the streets in hysterical, reactionary response to a bit of badly drawn graffiti. I am simply saying that any evidence of possible neo-nazi activity or feeling most certainly warrants discussion.

So, assuming that swastikas daubed on walls are bad ? and I think most sane people on here would agree they are ? what's the best course of action? I was going to paint over the one on Fellbrigg Road, but I think it's on someone's house. Would I get any funny looks if I tried to cover it do you think?
The danger of that is that someone may mistake you for the culprit and thump you before you get the chance to explain that you are actually covering it up, or if it is on a house might prosecute you for defacing the property, call the Council, they are usually pretty quick where racially offensive grafitti is concerned.

mattham Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

Would I

> get any funny looks if I tried to cover it do you

> think?


That's a tricky one. Someone might think you'd had one too many in Palmerston, did it on the way home and (having sobered-up the next day and realised your error) rushed out to cover the evidence.


In any case the council might fine you for defacing council property - by way of one of their 'Nazi' wardens.

mattham Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was going to paint over the one on Fellbrigg

> Road, but I think it's on someone's house. Would I

> get any funny looks if I tried to cover it do you

> think?



Did said house have a large St George's flag hanging out of the upstairs window? If so, we may have found our culprits...

Yes the Council are good at this stuff - if people report it! I spoke to them at about half 3 and they said they'll be out within 4 hours to sort it out. I could only tell them about The Gardens one, if anybody else knows locations ring them on 020 7525 5777 - also a handy number if you have noisy neighbours!!

Blimey, I've missed a lot of discussion.


*Bob*, seems my comment annoyed you - apologise if that was the case, it certainly wasn't intended as a lecture. It was intended to express mild amazement and in hope that you would go into more detail. Sorry if it came across wrongly.

furryjumpergirl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes the Council are good at this stuff - if people

> report it! I spoke to them at about half 3 and

> they said they'll be out within 4 hours to sort it

> out.


Rolo Tomasi did say he had reported it to Southwark around midday on Wednesday.

I guess the question is whether they have all been reported? And have any/all been removed now?

I saw some Council guys removing the one at the end of my road and one on the bus stop round the corner early this morning - they seemed quite taken aback when I thanked them profusely! I told them there were more dotted around and they said they'd have a look. Perhaps the ones Rolo reported were in a different area?
So a StGeorge's cross is Nazi now......mmm....what a stupid PC load of crap. You see loads of different people of all races with StGeorges' flags during the World Cup...its somehow only a symbol of naziism to highly idiotic PC white libersls who still think it's the 1980s (or in more extreme cases the 1960s)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • If you're a fundraising intermediary, reporting promptly and accurately on how you've raised and spent funds seems quite important.
    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...