Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Was anyone else aware that the main Post Office on Lordship Lane was closed today due to a strike? I have heard that it is under threat of closure ? does anyone know if that is true? And if so, is there a petition anywhere I can sign against it?s closure? (If that is a fallacy, does anyone know why they are on strike?)


What should have been a quick, half hour trip to post some packages just turned into a two hour round trip to the one down near the Plough. It took so long as they only had one counter open, and were obviously dealing with the overflow ? the queue was huge. What a waste of an afternoon.


I am surprised if they are going to close the Lordship Lane branch, as it seems to be busy every time I go in there (at various times of day, and days of the week) and always have to queue. I don?t relish the thought of having to divert to one of the other less conveniently placed ones, particularly if they can?t provide the same level of service. What will it become? Yet another caf??


Edited to change title.

We should all support the local main PO workers in their strike action to save their jobs not only as a matter of course, but because we all benefit from this PO. Strike action and loss of pay is always a last resort. Don't moan about the inconvenience because if it is closed down people will lose their jobs and we'll be inconvenienced for good.

keane Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That's crazy - it's a really busy post office

> serving the community.


Ditto. It provides essential services. Whenever I've complained about the staff shortages and lines spilling out onto the pavement, the overstretched staff including the branch manager have said "Complain. We need more staff." And what about people without the ability to reach the nearest post offices? According to their spiel, their "priority is to maintain Post Office services to the local community." Bollocks.

buddug Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What, I wonder, do our exalted councillors and MP

> have to say on this matter, or are they keeping

> quiet in the hope it'll be turned into a

> Waitrose...



Could our Local Councillors be keeping quiet as they are in a coalition with the Tory's who are hell bent on selling off the Post Office and the Royal Mail services to the highest bidder?

LORDSHIP LANE POST OFFICE REPLACEMENT


I am cutting and pasting this from James Barber's blog. Absolutely no comment at all from me as I have no idea at all what the facts are of this issue.


The Post Office has 373 Crown Post Office branches. It?s decided to transfer 70 to retail partners.


One of the 70 is our one on Lordship Lane.


They have stressed to me that this is not about closing our post office on Lordship Lane but rather replacing it. But obviously this will cause great concern and will require a 6 week public consultation.


My experience of such Post Office replacements has been very positive but that is no guarantee it will work well on Lordship Lane.


A Post Office spokesperson stated ?We are confident that our plans will mean that customers continue to benefit from a Post Office in their locality delivering service of the highest quality. Partnering with a complementary, respected retailer will also provide for long term viability and sustainability of the branches in question.?


What do you think to this change?

Some months ago i was asked about a rumour post office staff were telling some customers about their 'crown post office" closing. A resident told me via a PM and it only took a few weeks to ascertain that.

I blogged about this in late March - http://jamesbarber.mycouncillor.org.uk/2013/03/28/lordship-lane-post-office-replacement/

Yes the post office will close IF a new franchise post office can be created on Lordship Lane.

We've been promised in writing that the replacement will offer exactly the same services.


The rationale.

Currently for every ?1 of comission and revenue towards their operating costs they spend ?1.48. Clearly this isn't sustainable.


My personal experiences are such francises can work well. Until last autumn my day job was near borough tube. The crown post office was closed and the replacement franchise I found gave me a better more personal service.


Timescales.

The want to find a business partner and have a franchise in place by Spring 2015.

> The rationale. Currently for every ?1 of comission and revenue towards their operating costs they spend ?1.48. Clearly this isn't sustainable.


> My personal experiences are such francises can work well. Until last autumn my day job was near borough tube. The crown

> post office was closed and the replacement franchise I found gave me a better more personal service.


And is it profitable? What is it about the economics that make a franchise viable when Post Office Counters seem only to be able to run it at a loss?

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > The rationale. Currently for every ?1 of

> comission and revenue towards their operating

> costs they spend ?1.48. Clearly this isn't

> sustainable.

>

> > My personal experiences are such francises can

> work well. Until last autumn my day job was near

> borough tube. The crown

> > post office was closed and the replacement

> franchise I found gave me a better more personal

> service.

>

> And is it profitable? What is it about the

> economics that make a franchise viable when Post

> Office Counters seem only to be able to run it at

> a loss?



Its clearly not profitable as costs are greater than revenues.


The private sector has demonstrated many times that an unprofitable service can be made profitable with productivity improvements. The public sector for a very long period of time has not been motivated to improve efficiency, and we all know where that has left many services today. Why indeed is the public sector still losing jobs while the private sector is increasing?


I expect that any franchise owner of such service would be clearly more motivated to make money - and the main way to make money is through improving the efficiency of service to customers.


If what James says is true, I am looking forward to a better service at a new Post Office. I am sick of queueing and wasting valuable time in ED - one of the worst post offices I have experienced!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...