Jump to content

Recommended Posts

On 22/02/2024 at 22:41, Froglander said:

Has anyone tried the 24 hour Medivet in Kenbury Street, Camberwell?  Was previously a non chain called The Animal Hospital and owned by a vet called David Cuffe who had a branch in Abbeville Road in Clapham. Don’t know if he still works there.  Medivet has also taken over the Clapham branch.

We had to take one of our newly born week old corgi puppies there last Saturday & in the end he was kept in overnight.  The team on duty were fantastic,  we were given an estimate based on what they believed was required and they committed to doing everything they could, although admitted he seemed really poorly and realistically had a poor chance of survival.   

Was in contact with the team 1st thing Sunday to learn he had thankfully pulled through against the odds - in the end the final bill came to less than half the estimate as the team hadn't wanted to add any additional stress to the puppy with tests they deemed unnecessary.   A breath of fresh air compared to most practices.

Couldn't thank them enough obviously as we thought we'd lost him! 

Edited by kbabes
Grammar
  • Like 3
On 28/02/2024 at 18:31, kbabes said:

We had to take one of our newly born week old corgi puppies there last Saturday & in the end he was kept in overnight.  The team on duty were fantastic,  we were given an estimate based on what they believed was required and they committed to doing everything they could, although admitted he seemed really poorly and realistically had a poor chance of survival.   

Was in contact with the team 1st thing Sunday to learn he had thankfully pulled through against the odds - in the end the final bill came to less than half the estimate as the team hadn't wanted to add any additional stress to the puppy with tests they deemed unnecessary.   A breath of fresh air compared to most practices.

Couldn't thank them enough obviously as we thought we'd lost him! 

How wonderful that your puppy pulled through after being admitted and what a nerve wracking time for you.  That’s a great testament to post about this vet practice.  

  • Like 2
  • 2 weeks later...

Think they score highly on Google reviews but on the bigger picture the CMA investigation will also show that as consumers shopping around helps keep prices down.  Although like dentistry, hairdressing, and funerals this is quite personal and you will often stick to a provider you are happy with/feel comfortable with.  

  • 3 weeks later...

Depends on the medicine dispensed, or did you mean writing a prescription that will be fulfilled elsewhere? I think last time that came up it was £40c for writing a prescription, but that was a while ago.

However, on looking at the price list online, a prescription charge is listed as £29.50, so it has improved [https://www.theneighbourhoodvet.co.uk/about-us/prices].

Edited by IlonaM
update

Do the women who started NV still work there? They expanded quite rapidly.  They have branches in Penge and Crofton Park. That £40 price for a prescription is/was shocking.

On 25/02/2024 at 18:11, Alec1 said:

They may not NEED vaccinations, but if you want to board them at all, most catteries and kennels require them to be up-to-date with the vaccinations offered. 

I wouldn’t use a place that forced your animal to have completely unnecessary vaccinations.  Better to have your pet looked after in their own home (especially cats) or in someone else’s home they are comfortable with.

Edited by Froglander
1 hour ago, Froglander said:

Do the women who started NV still work there? They expanded quite rapidly.  They have a branches in Penge and Crofton Park. That £40 price for a prescription is/was shocking.

I wouldn’t use a place that forced your animal to have completely unnecessary vaccinations.  Better to have your pet looked after in their own home (especially cats) or in someone else’s home they are comfortable with.

Agreed.  If I were to get another cat, whether vaccinated or not, I would prefer to have them looked after at home.

10 hours ago, IlonaM said:

What I have suspected all along with the chains, but sad to read nevertheless. And I feel sorry for the poor vets, I'm sure this wasn't how they envisaged it would be when they started to train as a vet. The corporates should bow their heads in shame. 

  • Agree 2
On 06/04/2024 at 21:35, d walker said:

And I feel sorry for the poor vets, I'm sure this wasn't how they envisaged it would be when they started to train as a vet.

I suspect quite a few vets went into the work hoping to make money. They weren't forced to take the corporates' shilling when they sold their practices. It may be that newly qualified vets don't like it. As doctors (GPs) who can't buy into partnerships don't like it. Salaried vets and GPs get paid less, but that doesn't mean they don't want to be paid more. 

Happened recently to my cousin's 3 year old Frenchie who became pregnant. 

Made her go back and forth, charging each admission and consultation on top of all the medication, she passed away within a few hours after waking up from her c-section and we are now in a medical negligence dispute with them. They had even prescribed the dog paracetamol, then looking at the bill afterwards it said Calpol 5ml per dosage, exactly as you would have for a 2 year old, same bottle and charged her £25. The vets is called VETS NOW and is a chain, please avoid at all costs. 

We had no idea that we could take the prescription and go get the medication ourselves, especially for something like Calpol. 

On 08/04/2024 at 08:33, Penguin68 said:

I suspect quite a few vets went into the work hoping to make money. They weren't forced to take the corporates' shilling when they sold their practices. It may be that newly qualified vets don't like it. As doctors (GPs) who can't buy into partnerships don't like it. Salaried vets and GPs get paid less, but that doesn't mean they don't want to be paid more. 

According to the NV website, they have a total of 19 veterinary surgeons across their three practices.  This includes Suzanne, who is one of the co-founders. 

  • 3 weeks later...

Hmm. Had already realised that drugs for pets are way cheaper bought online from legit providers. Asked the Neighbourhood Vet for a repeat prescription worming tablet and this time they've quoted me £30.00 just to write the thing out! Have attended there regularly with my dog; boosters, spay etc all very recently so I think that charging £30 just to issue a worming prescription is excessive and unjustified. Wipes out most of the savings I make from ordering the drugs online - but maybe that's the point! Anyone else had this experience? Is it same at all local vets? Thanks all.

  • Sad 1
Hey there,
 
This is Suzanne from The Neighbourhood Vet.
 
I am writing on this forum - as a first and last time - to ask people to think about the level of criticism of vets that’s happening, especially recently, and ask if you think is really ok? 
 
I established the practice 12 years ago with Amber and we joined a corporate called IVC Evidensia in 2019. Amber went back to Australia and Simon joined me as co-Clinical Director in 2020. We now have 70 employees across 3 sites and I think we have a pretty amazing and special practice. 
 
The upset caused by the criticism of vet practices is not just about The Neighbourhood Vet and our staff. We get equally affected when we hear people saying bad things about Ms Robson’s practice, DNA pet care practices (Peckham/ Mayow Rd/ Parish Lane/ Streatham etc), Medivet practices (Lordship Lane, Camberwell, New Cross, Beckenham etc) or other IVC practices (Norwood Rd, Paxtons, Easipetcare). 
 
All vet practices are a business and have to make a profit otherwise they will not survive. Just because we happen to be a place that cares for your pets, it doesn’t mean we can do this for free. Not a single person I know who works in the vet profession, chose to do so for the money, rather it is because we love animals, and continue to do our best for them every day, even whilst hearing the most terrible things said about us.
 
I personally have been criticised for selling to a corporate rather than staying independent but until you have dealt with the pressure (financial and otherwise) of running a business that cares for pets (which seems to be the most emotive topic for people) then I’d ask you be respectful of my decision.  The corporate practices are the obvious target in any criticism of vet practices - we do not always get things right, and there is always room for improvement but we are all working for the common goal which is to look after your pets.
 
None of our vets work on commission or get any performance-based bonus. None of our staff have financial targets that they are expected to achieve.  Different practices do different things and charge differently as do other businesses that provide similar services - think M&S vs Sainsbury’s vs Lidl vs a corner shop vs Waitrose. You do not expect to pay the same at these places so I am not sure why people think that vets should price-match and all charge exactly the same? 
 
If you decide that you are not happy with something (our staff/ practices/ cost of medication/ receptionists/ cost of prescriptions/ way of working/ vets etc etc etc), then we would encourage you to discuss this with us. On any given day we can have a multitude of complaints from prescription charges to having to wait for 10 minutes because of an emergency to our consult prices on a weekend to the receptionist not being sufficiently friendly, and this all takes time away from caring for you and your pet. 
If you genuinely think it will make you feel better to write something bad or that you are providing a service to others with your criticism, then of course you can do that, but please refrain from spreading inaccurate information or making bold assumptions about our Vets and staff. 
 
We do not respond on socials because do not want to give air to toxicity, however, most of our staff (and others in the vet profession) would know about the things written about them. Vets have the highest suicide rate of any profession and the mental health of many in the vet profession is easily eroded by social media.
So before you feel the need to tear someone down, perhaps think instead that it might be better to be kind. It would make the world a much nicer place. 
 
 
Suzanne
 
Dr Suzanne McNabb BSc BVSc MACVSc MSc MVS MRCVS
She/Her
Clinical Director
The Neighbourhood Vet
66 Lordship Lane
East Dulwich
SE22 8HJ
22 hours ago, The Neighbourhood Vet said:
Hey there,
 
This is Suzanne from The Neighbourhood Vet.
 
I am writing on this forum - as a first and last time - to ask people to think about the level of criticism of vets that’s happening, especially recently, and ask if you think is really ok? 
 
I established the practice 12 years ago with Amber and we joined a corporate called IVC Evidensia in 2019. Amber went back to Australia and Simon joined me as co-Clinical Director in 2020. We now have 70 employees across 3 sites and I think we have a pretty amazing and special practice. 
 
The upset caused by the criticism of vet practices is not just about The Neighbourhood Vet and our staff. We get equally affected when we hear people saying bad things about Ms Robson’s practice, DNA pet care practices (Peckham/ Mayow Rd/ Parish Lane/ Streatham etc), Medivet practices (Lordship Lane, Camberwell, New Cross, Beckenham etc) or other IVC practices (Norwood Rd, Paxtons, Easipetcare). 
 
All vet practices are a business and have to make a profit otherwise they will not survive. Just because we happen to be a place that cares for your pets, it doesn’t mean we can do this for free. Not a single person I know who works in the vet profession, chose to do so for the money, rather it is because we love animals, and continue to do our best for them every day, even whilst hearing the most terrible things said about us.
 
I personally have been criticised for selling to a corporate rather than staying independent but until you have dealt with the pressure (financial and otherwise) of running a business that cares for pets (which seems to be the most emotive topic for people) then I’d ask you be respectful of my decision.  The corporate practices are the obvious target in any criticism of vet practices - we do not always get things right, and there is always room for improvement but we are all working for the common goal which is to look after your pets.
 
None of our vets work on commission or get any performance-based bonus. None of our staff have financial targets that they are expected to achieve.  Different practices do different things and charge differently as do other businesses that provide similar services - think M&S vs Sainsbury’s vs Lidl vs a corner shop vs Waitrose. You do not expect to pay the same at these places so I am not sure why people think that vets should price-match and all charge exactly the same? 
 
If you decide that you are not happy with something (our staff/ practices/ cost of medication/ receptionists/ cost of prescriptions/ way of working/ vets etc etc etc), then we would encourage you to discuss this with us. On any given day we can have a multitude of complaints from prescription charges to having to wait for 10 minutes because of an emergency to our consult prices on a weekend to the receptionist not being sufficiently friendly, and this all takes time away from caring for you and your pet. 
If you genuinely think it will make you feel better to write something bad or that you are providing a service to others with your criticism, then of course you can do that, but please refrain from spreading inaccurate information or making bold assumptions about our Vets and staff. 
 
We do not respond on socials because do not want to give air to toxicity, however, most of our staff (and others in the vet profession) would know about the things written about them. Vets have the highest suicide rate of any profession and the mental health of many in the vet profession is easily eroded by social media.
So before you feel the need to tear someone down, perhaps think instead that it might be better to be kind. It would make the world a much nicer place. 
 
 
Suzanne
 
Dr Suzanne McNabb BSc BVSc MACVSc MSc MVS MRCVS
She/Her
Clinical Director
The Neighbourhood Vet
66 Lordship Lane
East Dulwich
SE22 8HJ

Although I think you're right to address your concerns about what you perceive as an attack on your business.  I do feel I need to respond to some of your comments;  I haven’t noticed any criticism in the posts of the clinical care delivered,  all the criticism has been in relation to your charges and billing,  which when compared to other practices does seem high. We know vets are business and don't expect treatment for free! But when prices are significantly higher people are going to question it.  This occurs not only on social media,  but in parks up and down the country as dog owners do discuss this. 

 

I agree your analogy that people can choose where to purchase their veterinary care, a bit like where they choose to purchase their groceries ( convenience store versus sainsburys versus Aldi etc). The big difference is with the supermarket chains there is choice.  Sadly what is happening with veterinary practices is a few massive chains have brought up all the previously independent practices,  therefore there isn't any real choice and these chains are monopolising the industry and forcing up prices to shocking levels ( veterinary prices have risen more than any other industry). I welcome the formal investigation of the CMA into veterinary costs. 

  • Like 2
  • Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • "They sold everyone, directly or indirectly, on the notion that Covid, the energy crisis and the war in Ukraine had nothing to do with the sorry state of the UK and that it was 14 years of Tory rule and Truss' nightmare budget that was the source of all the country's woes. " This simply isn't true. Global issues all play their own parts (as they do with other countries) but the UK govt had  been especially abject for years. Improvements could not be made with them in power. That's not to say everything is all roses when they go To claim parties shouldn't try and sell themselves in an election is absurd - but if labour did overpromise or dig into specifics (which they partly couldn't because they didn't have their hands on the books) then we live in a country where a population and media is happy to punch on them and relect the shabby last govt I mean if any argument I made was supported by some posters I would rethink it but thats just me
    • They just gave woolly and opaque policies on the basis of "we will not increase tax for working people" and then could not clearly define what a working person is. They sold everyone, directly or indirectly, on the notion that Covid, the energy crisis and the war in Ukraine had nothing to do with the sorry state of the UK and that it was 14 years of Tory rule and Truss' nightmare budget that was the source of all the country's woes. the moment they got in they lent in to the notion that change will be slow due to global challenges. The electorate are impatient and Labour were always going to have a huge job to keep people onside and bought in to the (long) journey the country is on to any sort of recovery. Their first 100 days should have been about solidifying the electorate's support for the journey but instead they have lurched from one own-goal to another and I think significantly distanced themselves from the electorate as they have behaved just like the Tories in many aspects of leadership (access to donors, clothing gate). Throw in spin on the £22bn gap (of which around £9bn was based on their own decisions), Winter Fuel payments ending and the attack on farmers (the very definition of working people) and it has been an utter disaster. They have a massive perceptual problem and seem incapable of delivering crisp messages that the people can get behind. Listening to members of the government trying to explain the intricacies and details of much of the aforementioned challenges is utterly painful to watch and people shut off after a couple of sentences. In opposition you can get away with soundbites and when you get scrutinised you can bridge to "14 years of hurt" and "we're not them" and people will buy it. When you're in the hot seat those things sounds hollow and suggest you don't have the answers and people will turn on you very quickly. It is in everyone's interests that they get it right because with a Tory party chasing the far-right vote because of Reform and Reform picking up disillusioned main political party voters then the alternative is really scary. Of course, we also have the threat from within the Labour party itself as if things don't go well for Starmer & co we could find Labour turning on itself.    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...