Jump to content

Recommended Posts

To answer the question - banks don't 'see' the act of cloning (or it wouldn't work), but their security algorithms pick up unusual usage activity, which a cloned card would demonstrate (i.e. close to simultaneous transactions geographically separated, unusual purchases etc. etc.)

Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ...but their

> security algorithms pick up unusual usage

> activity, which a cloned card would demonstrate

> (i.e. close to simultaneous transactions

> geographically separated, unusual purchases etc.

> etc.)


That's the theory but unfortunately, in my experience, this often doesn't work as expected. On two separate occasions, albeit several years ago, whilst driving in London (and thereby paying the Congestion Charge via Autopay on my credit card) I was apparently also in Bangkok paying for some rather large hotel bills! And yet, on another two occasions when making substantial (but not unusual) payments in a particular shop, my card was incorrectly blocked. I hope the AI has learned from its mistakes since then.

That's the theory but unfortunately, in my experience, this often doesn't work as expected.


The only card cloning I've had has been picked up quickly (even before the bank paid out to the merchant) - and the algorithms are getting better, but of course different issuers use different security algorithms and staff their security centres differently - some are 24 hour - some use their AI IT to immediately block transactions and then only review the machine decision during 'office' hours. It would be possible (in the case you quoted) that an authorised user (spouse?) was driving your car in London whilst you were travelling in Bangkok on business - in which case blocking either transaction would have been more than an annoyance. I've had something similar - luckily my card issuer put a hold on the transactions (not the card) until they could clarify that the transactions were kosher or not. Sometimes banks can put a temporary block on a card and then clear it if transactions are seen as 'correct' - but some issuer's processes require a complete card re-issue once a perceived problem has arisen. It's always a good idea to carry a couple of cards in case that happens to the one you're using.

Two new posters, both created at pretty much the same time, both have made a couple of innocuous but irrelevant comments on other threads, then one resurrects an old thread and the other post spam links. This is about the fourth or fifth time this week (different posters, different threads). It's spam, just a bit more ingeniously done.


User Profile : JoeIskor

Email: Hidden (but registered users can send me a message)

Posts: 5

Date Registered: 04/07/2019 09:19

Last Activity: 11/07/2019 09:38


ser Profile : Kleeeniks

Email: Hidden (but registered users can send me a message)

Posts: 4

Date Registered: 04/07/2019 08:45

Last Activity: 11/07/2019 09:59

@penguin68

Yep, that's a fair point. In my cases the card issuer was perhaps unlucky enough to get it "wrong" from my perspective on four occasions. Where my transactions (not the card as I perhaps misled you earlier) were blocked I did indeed have a trusty alternative to use to save myself from a potentially embarrassing situation.


Anyway, perhaps this thread can be laid to rest once again... for a while at least :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm certainly not surly - it's Friday, so I'm in a delightful mood.  As Earl Aelfheah said, the money has to come from somewhere. But Labour new that hiking fuel as well as employee NIC in would be a step too far - for businesses and consumers. It was the right decision for this moment in time. Suggesting that someone who's against fuel duty increase on this occasion is against and fuel duty full stop is quite a leap. Why do you demonise everyone who doesn't think that owning a car is a cardinal sin?  I'm not sure using Clarkson as an example of your average farmer holds much weight as an argument, but you know that already, Mal. 
    • Hope it's making others smile too! I don't know the background or how long it's been there 😊
    • If you are against the increase in fuel duty then you are surly against fuel duty full stop.  It has not kept up with inflation, I'm talking about getting it back on track.  Ultimately road user charging is the solution. Labour will probably compromise on agricultural land inheritance by raising the cap so it generally catches the Clarksons of the world who are not bothered about profits from land beyond, in his case, income from a highly successful TV series and the great publicity for the farm shop and pub
    • Were things much simpler in the 80/90s? I remember both my girls belonging to a 6th Form Consortium which covered Sydenham Girls, Forest Hill Boys and Sedgehill off Bromley Road. A level classes were spread across the 3 schools - i remember Forest Hill boys coming to Sydenham Girls for one subject (think it was sociology or psychology ) A mini bus was provided to transport pupils to different sites, But I guess with less schools being 'managed' by the local authority, providers such as Harris etc have different priorities. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...