Jump to content

Recommended Posts

To answer the question - banks don't 'see' the act of cloning (or it wouldn't work), but their security algorithms pick up unusual usage activity, which a cloned card would demonstrate (i.e. close to simultaneous transactions geographically separated, unusual purchases etc. etc.)

Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ...but their

> security algorithms pick up unusual usage

> activity, which a cloned card would demonstrate

> (i.e. close to simultaneous transactions

> geographically separated, unusual purchases etc.

> etc.)


That's the theory but unfortunately, in my experience, this often doesn't work as expected. On two separate occasions, albeit several years ago, whilst driving in London (and thereby paying the Congestion Charge via Autopay on my credit card) I was apparently also in Bangkok paying for some rather large hotel bills! And yet, on another two occasions when making substantial (but not unusual) payments in a particular shop, my card was incorrectly blocked. I hope the AI has learned from its mistakes since then.

That's the theory but unfortunately, in my experience, this often doesn't work as expected.


The only card cloning I've had has been picked up quickly (even before the bank paid out to the merchant) - and the algorithms are getting better, but of course different issuers use different security algorithms and staff their security centres differently - some are 24 hour - some use their AI IT to immediately block transactions and then only review the machine decision during 'office' hours. It would be possible (in the case you quoted) that an authorised user (spouse?) was driving your car in London whilst you were travelling in Bangkok on business - in which case blocking either transaction would have been more than an annoyance. I've had something similar - luckily my card issuer put a hold on the transactions (not the card) until they could clarify that the transactions were kosher or not. Sometimes banks can put a temporary block on a card and then clear it if transactions are seen as 'correct' - but some issuer's processes require a complete card re-issue once a perceived problem has arisen. It's always a good idea to carry a couple of cards in case that happens to the one you're using.

Two new posters, both created at pretty much the same time, both have made a couple of innocuous but irrelevant comments on other threads, then one resurrects an old thread and the other post spam links. This is about the fourth or fifth time this week (different posters, different threads). It's spam, just a bit more ingeniously done.


User Profile : JoeIskor

Email: Hidden (but registered users can send me a message)

Posts: 5

Date Registered: 04/07/2019 09:19

Last Activity: 11/07/2019 09:38


ser Profile : Kleeeniks

Email: Hidden (but registered users can send me a message)

Posts: 4

Date Registered: 04/07/2019 08:45

Last Activity: 11/07/2019 09:59

@penguin68

Yep, that's a fair point. In my cases the card issuer was perhaps unlucky enough to get it "wrong" from my perspective on four occasions. Where my transactions (not the card as I perhaps misled you earlier) were blocked I did indeed have a trusty alternative to use to save myself from a potentially embarrassing situation.


Anyway, perhaps this thread can be laid to rest once again... for a while at least :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Time will tell if H&B are loved or loathed, the footfall they get and generate will determine if they stay or go. That's the nature of businesses, they come and go dependant on usage. Examples are M&S, Poundland Local, Co-op, Superdrug, Mons, the chain restaurant/takeaways, the chain Estate Agents, Toolstation, Screwfix to name a few.  As much as people would like to see Lordship Lane remain a high street of independents, it is becoming clear that due to Landlords hiking rents, some are unable to survive. This leaves empty units which some of the chain brands considering it to be worth a "punt". I'd have thought that businesses operating in shops is a better alternative than a high street with multiple empty units, but what do I know, they are just thoughts on the subject.   Take a look at Croydon and Bromley where what were once thriving high streets are in decline.  I have to say that some of the prices charged by the independents are eye watering, and incomes i'd have thought have to be substantial to afford their prices. Personally I'd love a Lidl to open on what was the site of the Harvester, but I guess that would get shouted down, oh the thought of Lidl in Dulwich. Whatever next. 
    • IMO, Sealy, the best nights sleep you'll ever have.  
    • I don’t know what the shop was originally next to the big St Christopher’s but if Holland and Barrett are taking it over then surely it’s good to have a choice on Lordship Lane? The Camberwell H&B is always empty but the Brixton branch busy.  I remember when the Marks & Spencer food shop was Iceland? Now the M&S is a very busy store and at the time regenerated the high street!
    • Nor would I have done, but it came up when I googled John Lewis reviews. Do you not trust TrustPilot reviews? Even allowing for the fact that many people only post reviews when they have had poor service, 27% one star reviews is indicative of something wrong, I would say. That's 27% of 76,392 reviews. That's an awful lot of people who don't  think the service they got from John Lewis was even worth two stars, let alone more. Screenshot attached.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...