Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I not going to join either side on this ( the Public celebration of her her death), however, public figures that do push through policies they know to be so harmful to various groups of society are fair game. It may not appeal to your sense of correctness but probably indicates how her policies affected you. Politicians are fair game at all times, this strange sense of don't speak ill of the dead is misjudged and inappropriate, especially to those for whom the debate about the effect of her policies ( both when put though and their continuing presence) still continues. Not necessarily a celebration, but we should allow a genuine debate about her and the effects she has had. Just because she died doesn't and shouldn't put these things off the agenda

Sorry Rosie, but I fight the current shower and I fought the inbetween lot, but I'm happy to reserve a bit of bile for the woman who cared nothing for the people whose lives and communities she destroyed and replaced with consumerism, greed and rabid selfishness.


Hated her when she was alive and nothing's changed now she's dead, other than a small black cloud that's lifted from my grim Northern past where the sun has momentarily poked through.


Just wish she'd take a load of the current lot with her.

JDR Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Not necessarily a celebration, but we should allow a

> genuine debate about her and the effects she has had.


I don't think anyone would reject the idea of a debate of her, but those posters advocating 'celebration' of her death are truly loathsome. How would they like the local community to cheer happily at their mother's death?

Loz Wrote:

...

> I don't think anyone would reject the idea of a

> debate of her, but those posters advocating

> 'celebration' of her death are truly loathsome.

> How would they like the local community to cheer

> happily at their mother's death?


My mother didn't ruin thousands of people's lives and refuse to listen to their pain, she just did it to a few of us!


Re: the Brand article, I agree it's fantatsic and it's also here in the Huffington Post: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/russell-brand/margaret-thatcher-our-unm_b_3046390.html?utm_hp_ref=tw

LadyDeliah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Re: the Brand article, I agree it's fantatsic and it's also here in the Huffington Post:


And the best part of that article pointed out that Thatcherism died in 1990. All that has happened since then that continued her political legacy is not her fault, but the fault of the politicians elected since then. And, of course, those that elected them.


Yesterday an old lady died. Nothing changed.

I disagree Loz, she was the beginning of an onslaught that has smashed it's way through our education, health and other public services for the benfit of her millionaire friends and to the detriment of the majority of the rest of us.


This is another good article but a bit more political than Brand's which explains why some of us hate her and want the current lot to join her. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/jan/04/margaret-thatcher-state-funeral-protests

LadyDeliah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I disagree Loz, she was the beginning of an onslaught that has smashed it's way through our

> education, health and other public services for the benfit of her millionaire friends and to the

> detriment of the majority of the rest of us.


Well, we can probably disagree on the politics of Thatcherite reforms until the cows come home. but the point remains, she ceased to be PM 23 years ago. If people followed her lead, then that's their fault, not hers. I can tell you what to do, but if you are silly enough to listen to me, you need to take some responsibility for that.


And another article in the Gruin (of all places)...


What might have happened if Thatcher never existed.

No LadyD, it's not a guess.


The only alternative to the future described in that article would have been someone else doing a 'Thatcher'.


The fact that it was Thatcher that did it is largely neither here nor there - and no excuse to demean ourselves by pursuing her into the grave like a lynch mob pulling pieces out of her body.


The foolish aspect to those that despise her is that they lack the imagination to consider the alternatives - and most importantly whether it would have been an improvement.


The truth is that the nation was staring in the face of a socialist implosion that would leave us not in a glorious agrarian idyll, but rather a desperate post industrial clusterfuck European outlier like the Ukraine.


To claim otherwise is revisionist.

I think there are two points here.


One thing to speak ill of her which I've no problem with (although personally my views are somewhere inbetween).


The second thing is celebrating a death. This is 2013 not 1613. We've come along way from public hangings and putting folk in stocks. If you want that sort of behaviour go out to Saudi Arabia.

Margaret Thatcher may be dead, BUT the damage she did to this Country is still evident..


1. She allowed people to Buy their Council Homes. (many could only just afford to do so)

Many of these homes were in a poor state of repair and the Councils wanted rid of them.


2. People then lost their jobs as many industries were closed down (Mines, Steel)


3. Homes were reposesed.


3. Rich landlords bought these homes at auctions.


4. The homes were rented out or redeveloped.


As a result there is now little affordable Social Housing Stock.

So now a new Tory Government has created the so called Bedroom Tax.

And we all Know the current situation.


More people may lose there homes.


Foxy.

Agree with JohnL and Lowlander... I've no problem speaking ill of her, she was tremendously unpopular when she was still alive, so why should that change now? But talk of celebration is pointless and rather juvenile, she'd had no influence for many years, her death doesn't suddenly make the world a better place.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Margaret Thatcher may be dead, BUT the damage she

> did to this Country is still evident..

>

> 1. She allowed people to Buy their Council

> Homes. (many could only just afford to do so)

> Many of these homes were in a poor state of

> repair and the Councils wanted rid of them.

>

> 2. People then lost their jobs as many industries

> were closed down (Mines, Steel)

>

> 3. Homes were reposesed.

>

> 3. Rich landlords bought these homes at

> auctions.

>

> 4. The homes were rented out or redeveloped.

>

> As a result there is now little affordable Social

> Housing Stock.

> So now a new Tory Government has created the so

> called Bedroom Tax.

> And we all Know the current situation.

>

> More people may lose there homes.

>

> Foxy.


Labour started it, she extended the policy. Anyway this thread is about the morals of celebrating death.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • No hesitation in recommending Pavel and his excellent company. So glad we were able to have a slot in the schedule. Our move has been stressful in many ways so it was a huge relief to have the contents of our home dealt with by kind, responsive professionals. 
    • I have someone from Which Tech phoning on Monday afternoon. I couldn't get an earlier appointment. I am hoping that now there is a visible display, they will be able to get me online and then  remotely control the laptop and identify what went wrong and whether it is an ongoing fault or, if not, whether it is likely to recur. If they can't, or if they identify a hardware fault,  I will have to grit my teeth and let John Lewis's third party "repair" company take it away and deal with it 😭 I'm very grateful for your advice, but when I saw "Windows will restart automatically" my immediate reaction was to think "but suppose it doesn't" and "suppose the screen goes black again" which I know is very negative but I'd rather someone else was there when I did it, albeit on the end of the phone! Meanwhile, every cloud etc, as I have installed Word on my phone, which I didn't know was possible, and I have been editing and printing documents from there.  I haven't investigated whether I can do the same with Excel, but I will see what happens on Monday.
    • Just to the right of where the goslings were there’s a tree on the lake side of the fence where I like to watch the mother and baby rats. It was there today  there was a  dog. I was surprised by the nimble way this large dog jumped back over the fence. 
    • If you mean the area immediately adjacent to the water, I have never seen either a dog or a human in there. Surely it would be extremely difficult for someone - or their dog - to get over the fence (I thought they were iron railings. Are we talking about different parts of the pond/lake?)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...